why double standards towards muslims?

sameer.84 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 5 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#1
*A Jew can grow his beard in order to practice his faith But when Muslim does the same, he is an extremist and terrorist!


*A nun can be covered from head to toe in order to devote herself to God, right? But, then, if a daughter of Muslim, why is she oppressed?


*When a western woman stays at home to look after her house and kids she is respected by the entire society because of sacrificing her life to her house But when a Muslim woman does so by her will, they say, "she needs to be liberated"!

*When someone sacrfices himself to keep others alive, he is noble and everyone respects him. But when a Palestinian does that to save his son from being killed, his brother's arm being broken, his mother being raped, his home being destroyed, and his mosque being violated --- He gets the title of 'terrorist'! Why? Because he is a "Muslim"!

*When someone drives a perfect car in an improper manner, no one blames the car.... But when any Muslim makes a mistake or treats people in a bad manner - people say "Islam is the reason"!

PS: i am not talking about each and every individual.

Created

Last reply

Replies

103

Views

10.4k

Users

21

Likes

99

Frequent Posters

373577 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#2
Perhaps because majority of terrorists happen to be muslims.
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#3
ermm.....i think you have a bit too far-streched imagination:
in the first instance:
no one is saying a muslim is a fanatic SIMPLY for having a foot-long beard!😆....its just that, from experience, the ones with such lengths of beards are known to be also the heads behind all those rubbishy fatwas or threats to people who dont "conform to beleif"
2nd pic:
no muslim woman can ever,EVER, want to cover herself up to be invisible...unless coerced or brainwashed from her childhood in that beleif....also the ideas behind a nunnery outfit and a burqa are different...so comparison between the two are invalid.
3rd case:
um, i am yet to hear such a case...this has nothing to do with muslim women or women of any particular faith...millions of women live lives as housewives....so i dont think any of them would be singled out for this...what is criticised, in this regard is, the muslim fanatics' diktat that women earning or venturing out of home to duties other than domestic, is Un-Islamic.
4th case:
the israel-palestinian conflict is NOT of a religious nature........the circumstances and ground of this conflict is PURELY of a political nature and needs to be seen from THAT aspect.......btw...more criticism is made of Israel for violating the human rights of innocent palestinian families and the occupation of Gaza, and , in my opinion, RIGHTLY SO.
the last point stands as invalid and a figment of imagination.
Edited by krystal_watz - 15 years ago
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#4
this guy's beard looks untidy and scruffy
koolkat97 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#5
I got this in a email really nice and it made me think!! :D
sameer.84 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 5 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

no muslim woman can ever,EVER, want to cover herself up to be invisible...unless coerced or brainwashed from her childhood in that beleif....also the ideas behind a nunnery outfit and a burqa are different...so comparison between the two are invalid.

oh really! 😆
then wht about those women who accept Islam and start wearing veil or those muslim girls who go against their family and wear them.
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: koolkat97

I got this in a email really nice and it made me think!! :D

Sorry I cannot see anything.
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#8
If I had a hammer
I'd hammer in the morning
I'd hammer in the evening
All over this land
I'd hammer out danger
I'd hammer out a warning
I'd hammer out love between my brothers and my sisters
All over this land
Folk song by Peter, Paul and Mary.
karandel_2008 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#9
I have posted my views several times on such topics and dont want to repeat them.

@Nun:

- We can see their faces clearly.

- I will have problems with them too if they became nun from childhood(read very small age). However, if a woman first gets education, grows up and then chooses to become a nun then I see no problem. Similarly for other religions.



Edited by karandel_2008 - 15 years ago
return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 15 years ago
#10

It is not that Islam is being singled out. It is just human nature to be fearful of harm. Unfortunately, the terrorists of 09/11 and other heinous activities across the world claim to be Islamic. It created a great impact on people who lost friends or family, or who were simply disturbed by such disregard for human life. Had the terrorists claimed to be Christian, Jewish or Hindu etc – then people would have viewed that religion differently.

No one believes that beard equates extremism. However, since most extremists bore beards and many fanatical ones started growing beards to flaunt their faith – the beard unfortunately got negative connotation. Not just Muslims, but Jews, Sikhs and other people who grow beards, wear religious head gear and turbans have had to change their ways to avoid prejudice. At the same time many people are growing long beards too in order to show that a long beard does not mean one is an extremist.

Nuns, Buddhist monks, priests etc take up their religious profession by choice. Being a nun or a monk is not necessary. These religions do not require strict dress codes for everyday ordinary people. Many Christian sects are also loosening up their restrictions. Priests and nuns can wear modest everyday clothing when not in service. There are sisters and nuns at Catholic institutions in India who wear sarees, salwar kameez, long skirts etc to fit in better with conventional society.

For many Muslim women the full body gear is not a garment that comes with a religious choice. It is expected to be worn by everyday ordinary people. Many women have been forced to do so without a choice. Many women are indeed afraid to say they don't want to. Hence, many countries are against such limited clothing. By speaking against this people do not want to restrict someone's religious right, but to encourage people to open their horizons and not be limiting. If we allow such clothing for everyday wear, how will we know who is being forced and who is choosing to do so? Muslim people have a choice whether they want to live in a western society or an Islamic country. Moreover there are many ways to be modest and cover oneself with conventional clothing. And its not just Muslims who are being asked to change their ways. Mormons, Southern Baptists, Amish who have many restrictions are also being constantly pressured to change their ways.

You are under the misconception that only Muslim women are under scrutiny when they choose to stay at home. This is completely untrue. Due to the male dominated culture in many Asian, South Asian, Latin American and even certain western communities – thousands of families are under scrutiny when women choose to stay at home. Even well to do WASP women who choose to stay at home are often questioned of their choices and encouraged to assert their individuality through volunteering, social work or hosting social clubs etc. It is not about religion, it is about fair treatment of women.

As for Israel-Palestine that is another huge political, social, religious debate. There are many factors to it that need extensive scrutiny and discussion. While I will admit that Israel has been guilty of aggression on many occasions, I am not aware of Israeli army conducting rape. Moreover there is a difference between declared war and terrorist attack.

At the same time please flip the coin – people who lost their families to Islamic terror, who found their children, loved ones, mangled and in pieces in the name of a religion – can you really expect them to be rational about it. Can you expect them to hold composure in distress and not even think of hating the religion under whose name the terrorists slaughtered.

As for the car I crash a Toyota. It is my fault. My family crashes Toyota. My family does not know to drive. Everyone keeps crashing Toyota. Something is wrong with Toyota. With Islam it is the one in between with the family. Only extreme views will say Islam is blameless or Islam has to bear all blame. A lot of these terrorists have been Muslim and the religion needs to accept that and try and reform.


Hate and prejudice is wrong, and I do not agree with those people who are prejudiced or biased against Muslims. Many people do misinterpret Islam - but it is not just outsiders. There are people within the religion too who give it a bad name. Everything must be held in perspective. Pulling out the victim card does not always solve problems. As John F Kennedy said Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. In similar vein Ask not what the world can do for Islam, ask what Islam can do for the world.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".