Vanga calls Masand, Anupama, Suchitra illiterate - Page 8

https://youtu.be/oYmaZa5UyUM

https://youtu.be/mQiiw7uRngk

https://youtu.be/5V04DETPF0o

Hasn't raw authentic love always been oblivious to it's various critics?

I have to agree on this https://x.com/ltemboyy_/status/1737385967013785973?s=20

Originally posted by: ohophelia

Animal is not some great cinematic masterpiece though even if you overlook all the problematic bits. Behind all the songs, action, and good performances, the story is borderline juvenile. And the plot twist of plastic surgery fitting with exact body build and physicality, that's from the 70s BW. Had this been some other movie, or even a Khan movie with plastic surgery as a plot twist, it would've been the butt of jokes by now. But sure, we're going with the narrative that Vanga is some cinematic genius who’s made some never-been-seen gem. So off I go. I can't argue with that line of reasoning.

…that’s not a decision u get to make on behalf of everyone, sadly ..

.arshad warsi, aparshakti khurrana recently went in a Roundtable for actors where they claimed to love the film and the way it’s scenes were done …allu arjun (national award winning actor btw) gave the film a glowing review …so did Telugu actor nani, so did madhur bhandarkar, so did kunal kohli, so did Trisha…so did rgv…

Back during kabir Singh, several directors from rajamouli to kjo praised vangas ability as a director…

So turning a completely blind eye to / mocking any positive discourse abt the film or the filmmaker and attributing it’s success solely to mysoginy, is also not reasoning one can argue with

He’s making a blanket statement abt Anupama, Sucharita and Masand based on the reviews they have given his films so far (collectively got kabir Singh and animal)…where the focus was extensively fixated on the moral standpoint of the film…and no such fixations happened in some of their other reviews for filmmakers they like …it’s a valid point and valid expectation for a critic to be objective ….because I have seen them gush abt such “morally bankrupt” cinema before …

https://x.com/HudHuddDabangg/status/1737395473286304078?s=20

Originally posted by: Briaahna

https://x.com/HudHuddDabangg/status/1737395473286304078?s=20

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

This is movie review or she thinks it’s a sketch comedy show ?

Originally posted by: Briaahna

but I say this tyagi is freaking annoying

She sounds like the problem of the movie is that Salman was lead not Anushka

That’s not objective criticism it’s just idiocy and very biased imho. Did she watch any promos ? What movie did she think was gonna play in cinema ?

Originally posted by: Briaahna

https://x.com/HudHuddDabangg/status/1737395473286304078?s=20

"Alpha male". And that too Sultan

Ranbir and Salman like most other Bollywood actors have both built their careers playing softies. Twitter users are the dumbest people alive.

Originally posted by: MostlyHarmIess

"Alpha male". And that too Sultan

Ranbir and Salman like most other Bollywood actors have both built their careers playing softies. Twitter users are the dumbest people alive.

She’s literally passing the “critisism” that sultan should have been a story abt arpha 🤦‍♀️
The entire arc of sultan is a guy who learns after his downfall and in the end even symbolically fights his own self to overcome his deamons …if she can’t even analyse cut and dry story telling like that ….why even is she being paid to review

Originally posted by: pathaka

She’s literally passing the “critisism” that sultan should have been a story abt arpha 🤦‍♀️
The entire arc of sultan is a guy who learns after his downfall and in the end even symbolically fights his own self to overcome his deamons …if she can’t even analyse cut and dry story telling like that ….why even is she being paid to review

My issue is with the new wave of Alpha Male stans of Ranbir. And Bri posting these random dumb wits