Vanga calls Masand, Anupama, Suchitra illiterate - Page 7

As a person and a director this guy Vanga is very direct and wants to express everything more explicitly. In some cases (movies, interviews) he went overboard with it, but it was absolutely right to comment about these critics.

Most of the times they are biased and give biased opinion in favor of producers or directors with whom they have good connections also they manipulate the audience knowing the audience well which can retaliate them.

The sideways groove ...

https://giphy.com/gifs/basketball-daily-trump-tLIYkp9rxq5dC

Best anti-triggering exercise regiment ever developed ... wanna buy?

Originally posted by: pathaka

If you are offended by “tyagi girl” on behalf of sucharita…then the makers would definitely be offended by sucharitas “small dick energy” comment on animals collections she made 2 days ago (which were tweeted in response to her review by the animal Twitter handle …one could argue its petty but it’s a sort of rebuttal and nothing disrespectful to her…small dick is a direct personal attack, not even relevant to the film)

The critics are not behaving “classy” for their critisism to be accepted “classily” …they are not willing to engage in debate ..they are willing to shit on the filmmaker publicly …which he’s not up for ..simple

Their reviews are coloured with confirmation bias questioning everything from the morality of a protagonist reflecting on the makers moral compass, religion of the villain (why is he a Muslim, this is a pro Hindu film …vanga the bigot), to the choice of genre (why is it so violent - it’s an A certificate action film with violence) , to holding the filmmaker responsible for “rabid Twitter fights” on Twitter …(sucharitas parting words btw)

All this while taking sly digs at him or anyone who likes the film on Twitter

It’s an ugly war .:.and both sides are being ugly

Critics gave their reviews. Team Animal in the form of Animal twitter account decided to respond to the reviews by mocking the reviewers. So if there’s an argument of mudslinging one should also talk about who started it. Team Animal wanted gaslight and ridicule critics who didn’t like the movie. Vanga can dish it out but can’t seem to be able to take it. And no, I do not believe that Animal Twitter account doesn’t at the very least have his blessing in how they’re handling critique.

I saw a comment on twitter (can’t find it now) that basically said Vanga made a movie to piss off a certain section of the audience and is now complaining because that section is pissed off.

Originally posted by: pathaka

No one paid them to review the person or psycho analyze him , they paid them to review the film
And before you tell me it’s impossible to do that, reviewers like rangan, hriday ranjan and a few others from Tamil, malayalam and Telugu industries have done that successfully without necessarily liking the film itself …

I'm genuinely thinking if you have even watched the reviews by Anupama and Sucharita. As biased they can be, this time around Anupama actually reviewed the film alone, she pointed out how the story was weak and character motivations are never explained, there is also lack of backstory which makes most of the bits come across superficial. Sucharita also critiqued the movie for most part except for some juvenile remarks, Masand doesn't even review anymore. Most of of the reviews by other publications have ripped apart the movie, but if the director is hell bent on taking it as a slight on his personality and character, what is one to do? Reviews saying that Scorsese made a sexist movie in Wolf of Wallstreet, doesn't say that Scorsese himself is sexist.

Animal is not some great cinematic masterpiece though even if you overlook all the problematic bits. Behind all the songs, action, and good performances, the story is borderline juvenile. And the plot twist of plastic surgery fitting with exact body build and physicality, that's from the 70s BW. Had this been some other movie, or even a Khan movie with plastic surgery as a plot twist, it would've been the butt of jokes by now. But sure, we're going with the narrative that Vanga is some cinematic genius whose made some never-been-seen gem. So off I go. I can't argue with that line of reasoning.

"Film is about techinuques" well duh.

Art is also political and social. All art is political. Even minstrel shows were ArT but they were primarily made to dehumanise Black people.

If a reviewer goes into the technique of a minstrel show while pussyfooting about their politics, they would be racist enablers. Loooooooooooooooooooooooool.

This film had every stereotype about a community fitted into one villain-rapist character, the hero sexually coercing a woman, and people out here talking about techniques, axial cuts, yellow lights whatnot. Screw your aesthetics.

Originally posted by: Blueeeee

"Film is about techinuques" well duh.

Art is also political and social. All art is political. Even minstrel shows were ArT but they were primarily made to dehumanise Black people.

If a reviewer goes into the technique of a minstrel show while pussyfooting about their politics, they would be racist enablers. Loooooooooooooooooooooooool.

This film had every stereotype about a community fitted into one villain-rapist character, the hero sexually coercing a woman, and people out here talking about techniques, axial cuts, yellow lights whatnot. Screw your aesthetics.

Watched Animal yet?

Well... Since very long I don't read/watch one of the three Vanga named and as I didn't watch any interview with Vanga neither, I'm happy to ignore all the four.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

I’ll just say If we do a deep dive I think some of Masand/Anupama reviews have also had that tone which Vanga is using in this video. Not that it makes it ok. It’s balances scales more than anything

That is true. Anupama and her coteries have called viewers “not intelligent enough” to understand the movie which is way ahead of its time. Thinly wailed insult.

Aah well.. I have no favorites between Vanga and Anupama.. lado.. maaro kuto ek dusre ko. I am enjoying.

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

That is true. Anupama and her coteries have called viewers “not intelligent enough” to understand the movie which is way ahead of its time. Thinly wailed insult.

Originally posted by: MaxMayfield

Most directors have a problem with critics..because they think critics don’t understand how to make a film..but they don’t realize..every person who comes to watch their movies is a CRITIC or a REVIEWER as well..I don’t understand why Vanga Reddy cannot just deal with the criticism his brand of movies get..you proved your point.made hundreds of crores..clearly there is an audience out there for you..but not EVERYONE HAS TO LIKE YOUR MOVIE and your misogynistic tone and composition Twitter has exploded with celebration over how this is a win over wokes and feminists And I see otherwise woke people being absolutely ok with Animal..such selective lens and doglapan I tell you Vanga is a crass, trash guy..who makes movies to troll progressive people..and he just wants to drag people back to the era where men and women were unequal..yeah let’s all celebrate that no ifs, no buts..otherwise you will be called illiterate

Vanga lives a sad life. He pretends he doesn’t give an f but makes movies to rile the same peeps he doesn’t give an f about