UK censor’s list of objectionable moments from Animal. SPOILERS!! - Page 11

Originally posted by: Newbird

You can't ignore bcz as long as you continue to talk on Animal they won't stop from judging your morality , so it's better to stop myself from posting my opinions on Animal in this forum. The extreme opinions I read in this forum made me want to run away from anything related to Animal movie today in this forum. It caused me severe migraine, I better stick to light hearted threads/topics for my own sanity

Let's face it, most of those who bring up the moral aspect are fans of certain actors and can't stomach that the movie and Ranbir are getting great feedback. I mean, the film hasn't even been released yet, and they're criticising it for things that may or may not be in the film.

Originally posted by: Kaya65

Let's face it, most of those who bring up the moral aspect are fans of certain actors and can't stomach that the movie and Ranbir are getting great feedback. I mean, the film hasn't even been released yet, and they're criticising it for things that may or may not be in the film.

You mean to say the people who're criticizing the justification of violence against women are all fans of a *certain actor*? Well, good for the *certain actor* then.

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly

I don’t think anyone has ever made a movie about Ted Bundy and glorified Ted Bundy in the process or shown him as the hero of the story. That’s the part everyone is concerned about. How has Vanga treated this story? Will Ranbir’s character be shown as the psychopathic criminal that he is or will his behavior and action be excused and glorified? The trailer already shows how he’s always craved his father’s love and never got it. Is that part of the story told just as a backdrop to show what makes the character tick? Or as a way to make the audience sympathize with him and “understand” where he’s coming from?

Issue here is given Vanga’s words and how doubled down after receiving criticism for Kabir Singh a lot of people don’t have any faith in him that he’s handled this story and character the right way.

Last point. JK Rawling is controversial for her bigoted stance on transgenders. And that started after Harry Potter became the worldwide phenomenon that it is now. Severely problematic yes but not the same as saying being in love means freedom to hit your partner.

See, Directors sometimes are obsessed with negative characters. Bhansali was obsessed with Khilji. He had two songs celebrating Khiliji's madness

There is a reason Why this movie is "A" rated. For adults only. I get teenagers should not watch this movie. They have an impressionable mind. They can be influenced by this

But what excuse do you have as adults to relate to this psychopath character?

No matter the past, the monologue, or even the songs, Ranbir's character is a psychopath. A dark character. He should not be idealized

A crime is a crime. Period.

After a point, adults really don't have anything but their own mentality to blame if they actually relate to such demented characters.

Let me make it clear that I am not supporting/justifying/glorifying violence against another human being

All I am saying is that as adults no matter How Mr. Vanga presents we should have it in us to be able to differentiate

Vanga is a problematic person. I don't like him either.

But a crime committed with a hero's BGM is still a crime. An adult will be able to differentiate

It should be common sense at this age don't you think?

Why did Ranbir choose to do this film, this role.

He will be asked this question ,and I want to know what his answer is.

He did call KS the greatest love story..

https://twitter.com/ilovesrksm/status/1728469749904842755

Originally posted by: you2

Why did Ranbir choose to do this film, this role.

He will be asked this question ,and I want to know what his answer is.

He did call KS the greatest love story..

https://twitter.com/ilovesrksm/status/1728469749904842755

Ummmm..... The simplest answer -That it gives a great scope to perform.

Why did Ranveer play Khilji?

Originally posted by: you2

Why did Ranbir choose to do this film, this role.

He will be asked this question ,and I want to know what his answer is.

He did call KS the greatest love story..

Negative characters are usually juicier than heroes unless they're caricatures. Any actor worth the title would want to sink his or her teeth into such a role. Ranveer has done Khilji and Lootera.

Also, that tweet is problematic because with all the deserved negativity from his exes toward Ranbir, no one has accused him of violence. Spreading false narratives is not cool whether it's this or about Deepika's non-exclusive dating.

The problem here is Vanga who portrayed Kabir Singh in a heroic way. His interviews oozed with misogyny. Animal looks like a non-comedic version of Sanju, justifying the unjustifiable.

You can play Khilji...why not.No one should play the villains character? In the film, there is a hero, there is a heroine and there is a villain.

So far RK is the hero,Rashmika is the heroine and Bobby is the villain.

There is a bIg difference.

A Big star can choose any role to show off his talent. What was so appealing in this.

You don't need a slasher film to win awards LOL.

I am not sure, did Komal and Taran Post Animal trailer?

Originally posted by: you2

Why did Ranbir choose to do this film, this role.

He will be asked this question ,and I want to know what his answer is.

He did call KS the greatest love story..

https://twitter.com/ilovesrksm/status/1728469749904842755

The logic why did Ranveer play Khilji doesn't make sense for one sole reason, through the director's lense, Khilji is the villian. When he pours gold on the princess, when he eats meat, you are supposed to be disgusted, even scared.

The whole thing is solely based on director's lense.

A story needs aa hero aand a villian. If the villian is not scary, disgusting why are you gonna hate him?

This isn't about the actors, it's about the directors, their vision, how they see their characters.

A simple example, Sanju. When Vicky cries infront of Paresh Rawal, Sanju is someone we loathe for putting the two men through that situation, but when Vicky ignores him, we hate Vicky, because that's what Rajkumar Hirani is telling us to do via his music, his actors, even his lighting and camerawork.