SPOILERS thread 4: BTS and upcoming arcs - Page 25

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

She is grown up when he needs to interfere in adults matter otherwise he is all child to take advantage. Both Mother-son duo is very selfish.

Originally posted by: saakkabc

😡 he is first hand witness to Viaan’s love story as Viaan shared all details with him. Also after all three got together he himself saw how much his mom loved Viaan. If his mother was able to forgive the so called horrific Sin his papa committed amd is so much in love with him, it doesn’t look convincing to audience for Aarav to hate Viaan

Ironically Viaan used to share details with that brat about he hurt her collugue that's why it's not easy for him and lot more.

But this 10 years boy can't even remember all those details and how much his mom loves/happy with Viaan but all he remembers how he needs to behave like a psycho in the name of mummy card.

Originally posted by: saakkabc

😡 he is first hand witness to Viaan’s love story as Viaan shared all details with him. Also after all three got together he himself saw how much his mom loved Viaan. If his mother was able to forgive the so called horrific Sin his papa committed amd is so much in love with him, it doesn’t look convincing to audience for Aarav to hate Viaan

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Ironically Viaan used to share details with that brat about he hurt her collugue that's why it's not easy for him and lot more.

But this 10 years boy can't even remember all those details and how much his mom loves/happy with Viaan but all he remembers how he needs to behave like a psycho in the name of mummy card.

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Ironically Viaan used to share details with that brat about he hurt her collugue that's why it's not easy for him and lot more.

But this 10 years boy can't even remember all those details and how much his mom loves/happy with Viaan but all he remembers how he needs to behave like a psycho in the name of mummy card.

And, this psycho has no problem in getting along with CHACHUUUUUUU. I lost my mind when I saw them togather. His psycho mind works against Viaan. Rest, he is normal. Writers still haven't learnt their lesson. Still refuse to give another explanation. I hated him now, I hate him even more. Honestly, he makes Katha look stupid. She can convince this brat to reconcile with Yuvraaj but, not with Viaan.

If he was that level of psycho, he shouldn't have reconciled with Yuvraaj as well after witnessing all that violence. There is no scope left now. I tried my best to fill in the gaps by thinking from character's perspective. I GIVE UP. NONE OF IT MAKES SENSE NOW bcoz of this episode.

Originally posted by: saakkabc

also I think the writers developed some sort of pre leap amnesia, where they forgot how Viaan’s love story was very much part of robin Batman bond

Brat knows every detail and writer brought this 10 years old kids psychotic behavior. Then what was the need to give those scenes where Viaan used to share everything about Katha!! Wasted.

Yeh Katha kyun ulta paath pada rahee hsin Aarav ko? Forgive and forget? Forgive for what? Ya hee Bol bolke dimaag khatab kar diya chots Bache ka… oops no, Man of the house ka. Bura past, hadsa, forgive? All these wonderful things for Viaan. Obviously he will hate more if she keeps referring to him as bura past and hadsa. Ok in the heat of the moment she couldn’t have convinced but I still cant get my head around this stupidity in the name of Katha and Aarav

Some one please tell me is the red saree bts part of forgetting the past and moving on into marriage with Raaghav? What was that? Because Raaghav was also dressed in an Indian attire in that bts along with Aarav and Ruhi

Originally posted by: Anj_01

This was problematic since the beginning. In yesterday's episode katha just repeated it. She clearly said it to vanya that this whole man of the house thinking got aarav protective about her and he over reacted. Thats why all the fuss.

I don't think except this incident Aarav has actually ever behaved like the "man of the house" like everybody keeps saying. I don't think even here Aarav has behaved like some "man of the house" by calling the shots for them both. Katha saw this as a chance to keep him away from Viaan, give him a family, give ruhi and Raghav a family and took it. It was not Aarav's doing. She could have easily said no but she didn't

I don't see why people find a child's love and protectiveness for his single mother wrong or unnecessary or "over". Objectively would it also have been wrong if Viaan was not in the picture? If his behavior was not hurting Viaan and if he wasn't suffering because of his anger? Ya uska reaction tab sahi hota?

Originally posted by: Tenochtitlan

Agreed

Leap is the entire issue. Time can change people. But, audience should be able to feel the change. I mentioned in the of the post how so many crucial details are missing. Very limited information is present and it is not easy to conclude from it.

Anyways, I lost my mind when I saw Yuvraaj in Bhai Dooj. I can still argue, in period of 8 months, Katha and Yuvraaj might have reconciled bcoz Yuvraaj helped in Aarav's treatment overtime but, Aarav and Yuvraaj shouldn't have reconciled. If Aarav is so hard to convince as shown and is so protective then, he shouldn't trust in Yuvraaj as well. He literally saw him brutally beating someone. Writers refuse to give any details and closure to audience toh doob maro.

Who is writing Aarav? Where is the perspective of characters?

They should have kept Kavita instead of Yuvraj from the Garewals. She was the only sane person in that house. Whatever she said made sense, and she wasn't so anti-viaan also. Aarav ko bhi dhang se samjha leti. This yuvraj is useless.