SPOILERS thread 4: BTS and upcoming arcs - Page 23

Originally posted by: Tenochtitlan

What you were speaking in that post was misleading. Don't know how you concluded that out of that episode. Also, I am tired of writing long threads and you said you don't write long threads. Had to say something, that came to my mind it was vague that I agree with. It was indeed a very bad defence.

You also said that Katha was interested in Viaan that's why she went with ONS. There are multiple lenses to see everything

I agree there are multiple lenses. But, this is nonsense. In that way, I can say Earth is flat not round. If you can say that then you can say anything. But, kya kr sakte hai forum decorum hai. We can agree or disagree or ignore. Bhale heen baatein jute khaane waali ho (Applies to me as well).

@red,

You are finding similarity between interested in ONS and soft corner This 2 word meaning isn't same but fans key lieye same hai

You need more lenses now as you are using only lense Katha to watch this show

It's misleading for you, not for everyone.

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

@red,

You are finding similarity between interested in ONS and soft corner This 2 word meaning isn't same but fans key lieye same hai

You need more lenses now as you are using only lense Katha to watch this show

It's misleading for you, not for everyone.

Originally posted by: Anj_01

And this whole man of the house thing becomes all the more cringeworthy because FL is single mom who was independent, took care her ill child, managed everything from finances to emotional support.

And after doing all that as a proud single mother (woman) she gives the whole concept to her son about there has to be a man of the house otherwise they are incomplete. And to add to the irony her 10 year old child assumes that role and also start behaving like one and she doesn't find anything wrong in that.

It was so cringe to see in initial phases to see Aarav making a tantrum and Katha making a move. Like, why Katha is marrying Raghav doesn't make much sense when Raghav was treating Aarav regardless. This is the entire reason Katha has became problematic. In the initial phases, it was shown as if Katha had no control over her actions. She was marrying Raghav because Aarav made a tantrum. It almost felt like if Aarav made a tantrum that he wants some watchman as his father, Katha will do that as well. It felt like Aarav was a father of Katha. I remember how she was hiding her engagement photo with Viaan from Aarav as if Aarav was her Father-in-Law. At this point, writers also don't have any valid reason to explain why she is marrying.

But, what is the correlation of this with yesterday's episode? Like, what is the fuss all about. She didn't say anything wrong which can cause this much enrage. This feels like unnecessary fuss.

Originally posted by: saakkabc

btw, when did this happen? I missed out a lot in between. When did you say?

In other topic she opened.

Here you go

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/katha-ankahee/5341222/viaan-is-psycho?pn=3

Soft Corner or Interest, doesn't change the narrative. It will still be nonsense.

I am watching with all lenses. You refuse to see when I say about other lens as well. Just like you refuse to see Katha lens even when it is shown on screen.

So many people are here elaborating non-Katha lens and I am elaborating Katha lens a bit too much so it looks odd.

Originally posted by: Tenochtitlan

can agree or disagree or ignore. Bhale heen baatein jute khaane waali ho (Applies to me as well).

Bolo bolo ..I don't care about decorum, I tell always what I feel.

Mey juta Dena bhi janti huu, Lena bhi janti hu ....India furm mey chalta rehta hai

Nowadays mods aren't active much, before they were so active. Didn't care at that time too, abb kyaii karungii

Originally posted by: Tenochtitlan

Soft Corner or Interest, doesn't change the narrative. It will still be nonsense.

Okay she was interested, so what? Took 1 crores for that night, didn't do freely too. Took all the advantage since than, aur kya chahieye

Viaan paid for what he did. Free mey toh Kuch nahi kia

Originally posted by: Tenochtitlan

Soft Corner or Interest, doesn't change the narrative. It will still be nonsense.

I am watching with all lenses. You refuse to see when I say about other lens as well. Just like you refuse to see Katha lens even when it is shown on screen.

So many people are here elaborating non-Katha lens and I am elaborating Katha lens a bit too much so it looks odd.

Yeah yeah majority can't see invisible pain, some blind katha fans only can see her invisible pain. Dekhto rahoo

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Watched few clips from yesterdays episode and I am glad it's ending

Aarav bana mera protector, he thinks she protects me Hello, you are her mummy, he is not your father.

Aarav bana man of the house Hello what women does in home? Follow mans order to exist? Downgrade architect Do not even want to talk about kids overstepping.

We (Arav) can handle everything he is your son women

Problematic women A to Z.

Katha needed redemption badly but ITV is so obsessed with FLs ethicless ethic.

Classic single child syndrome. It's not something that is uncommon in families especially for a male child. Dysfunctional, I know, but fairly normal to witness in reality too. Good or bad it's a character trait and if not tempered by inherent maturity it can come across as entitlement.

There's also the fact that Katha has overcompensated in every aspect for the lack of other parent, and aarav is a single child who has been seriously ill all his life. She has seen him just struggling to merely live, and he has seen her struggling to give him a good life. He is the same child who was overcome with debilitating anxiety during his exams because he thought if he didn't do well he wouldn't get a good job and won't be able to provide a good life for his mother. He wanted to grow up faster so that he could help solve his mother's adult problems. Katha is right when she says that he has always been independent and overprotective of her. I would think it to be very normal feelings for a child who only has his mother in the name of family.

Right or wrong I can't say. It's not black or white. No child is just one thing. We are all three-dimensional people with both good or bad qualities. Only time will tell if Katha is a good mother or not, or if Aarav turns out to be a well-rounded child or not.

Originally posted by: _OrChiD_

Okay she was interested, so what? Took 1 crores for that night, didn't do freely too. Took all the advantage since than, aur kya chahieye

Viaan paid for what he did. Free mey toh Kuch nahi kia

That's why redemption makes sense. One crore isn't a small amount for anyone and she got all that amount so easily. Aarav's life was saved because of this. Mujhe isse koi dikkat nahi. That's why one shouldn't play ONS card for everything happening in the show.

But, this shouldn't be something which comes out. And, it is very difficult to explain to any third person why she is marrying Viaan when she knows that.