Honestly since all are pretty angry at anupama for always choosing Sahhs over anuj and CA
I feel this is society issue not only anupamas issue. Women whether daughter or wife are blackmailed to be subservient to family i majority families especially asia. You can say europe and USA too women are a bit subservient but not as much as asia. There government protects wome if abondoned by boy friend or husband or family and parents so they need not fear society and family abondoning them like asia. Also there 90% women work and get work and good enough salary in india 90% women also do not earn enough to sustain themselves. In USA and europe no stigma around alone women like single, divorcee, widow in india single woman will be abused by parents, brother, sister in laws only forget society at large.
I mean women and girls are by nature taught by family and in laws to be subservient to men of house and obey elders orders in patriarchal society like asia. Also they are told from childhood if you do not follow our orders if you land in trouble do not expect any help. Society also boycotts family abondons and government well they give a damn to women who are considered second class anyways. That is why if lover marries and abondons a woman her family never takes her back in fear many woman dare not like any man or choose man to marry. Like anupama they prefer arranged marriages because they know if something goes wrong their family never accept them back if its love marriage. And most men do not really love girl friend in these times in real sense like an anuj kapadiya for them as soon as reality of life strikes they run off like Mayas lover did or abandon lover.
The thing is daughter has to obey parents and grandparents orders than husband and in laws orders finally obey son or grandson orders. Not so long agao even in 80s or 90s thats how it was. Ideally even if woman went to work like my mother they had to give full salary in father in law hand or husband hand. They could not decide how to spend their hard earned money
Even today if son goes to work he can spend his money as he wishes and need not hand it to parent but a daughter has to ideally give money to parent or hubby in most indian house holds. They will than give her pocket money etc. So most women tend to tell lower salary to parents or husband so that they can save some money. This even women working as IT professional do tell lower salary to husband or parents to save separately for themselves. Like how Shahs are still taking anupama money after her second marriage. I have never seen a divorced woman give money to ex hubby house hold to run it.
Even anuj is emotionally blackmailed by anupama and shahs to shell out lakhs to them every other month on one pertex or other. How were Shahs managing before anuj arrived or if anuj never married anupama is mystery? Now in real life too daughters are blackmailed to shell out most money they earn for their family, parents or in laws and hubby. They can hardly save for themselves. Also in many cases husband buy property in his name his fathers name using wife money. Like Hasmukh and vanraj doing using anupama money or anuj money to pay off loans and buy factory back etc. But did Hasmukh transfer it to anuj kapadiya or anupama name no, than hows he using their lakhs
In india money given to parents(ok lets forget parent they spent a lot brining you up but hasmukh leela are not anupama parents so why give them) or grandparents or relatives or in laws never ever comes back. So anuj should forget his lakhs and crores. Anuj is super rich so if few crores go to Shahs its ok but otherwise too if you are not so rich once you give money in lakhs to relatives or in laws or friends it usually is never returned in india. You have to ask million times to get some lakhs back may be. And when relations are involved most do not ask too much and let it be. So anuj can forget his money.
Anupama can ideally give as much money to her mother and brother i will never object. But why give to ex hubby or in laws. It will never come back nor they respect her or anuj or anuj family like barkha no matter what help they do.
Women born in 70s, 80s, 90s have been programmed to remain sub subservient to family be it parents or ex in laws etc and thats how anupama behaving. This is society problem not anupamas. Those that are not subservient like rakhi or maya are called what you all have known or heard. They are treated as cheap woman and misbehaved at and alone always. So in fear most 99% remain subservient to family although it may be toxic and abusive and voilent family
I am not saying her anupam ais right being sub subservient to shahs. But when anuj is unwell shahs only land up not anupama mom or other relations of anuj to help anupama. Shes scared to lose that one family support for rest life so bends to them.
All girls in asia do same bend to parent or sibling or husband no matter how toxic or abusive because in times of need only they will come or be there no society no relatives no government comes
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
1