🏏ICC Men's T20IWC 2022 - Ind vs Ban, M-35th, Super 12 Group 2🏏 - Page 63

Created

Last reply

Replies

644

Views

12.6k

Users

31

Likes

1.3k

Frequent Posters

aekiel thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: basherz


minor correction, Aus progressed to the finals not due to the Super Six tables but it was because Aus won the previous encounter against them in the WC.


This says Aus progressed because they had finished higher in the Super Sixes.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Cricket_World_Cup


If SA had beaten Zim in the group stages, SA would have had 8 points in the Super Sixes and finished ahead of Aus in the table. In such a scenario, if they ended up playing Aus in the SF and it had been tied, they would've progressed to the final, not Aus.

basherz thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: aekiel


This says Aus progressed because they had finished higher in the Super Sixes.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Cricket_World_Cup


If SA had beaten Zim in the group stages, SA would have had 8 points in the Super Sixes and finished ahead of Aus in the table. In such a scenario, if they ended up playing Aus in the SF and it had been tied, they would've progressed to the final, not Aus.

1999 wc was a weird cup, group stage points got carried over to Super Six too. So for instance - Aus, SA, NZ qualify from Group A.

Aus wins against SA, NZ in group matches - they already have 4 points when they come to Super Six. India missed out semis due to this reason as well, we came with 0 points I think. We lost to both our group teams - Zimbabwe & the other guys.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Cricket_World_Cup_2nd_semi-final


"Had Australia not won the game, they would have been knocked out of the World Cup. As it happened, the victory allowed them to finish in second place in the Super Six stage, and qualify to play South Africa in the semi-final."


its still ifs & buts the earlier scenario, SA knew it clean - they had to win to goto finals.

TitForTat thumbnail
Navigator Thumbnail 2nd Anniversary Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: aekiel


Haha, but technically, they didn't lose the 1999 semi. It was tied.


Aus progressed to the final because they had finished higher in the Super Sixes table.


If SA had beaten Zim in their group game, they would've finished higher than Aus in the table, and would've therefore advanced.


We might even see a SA-Eng 1992 SF repeat in this tournament! 😃

i know they would have reached SF had they won against South Africa. But they could not progress inspite of losing the match lol

Such things are normal for SA. Even in 1992 they lost a match they were winning because of rain.

basherz thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: TitForTat

i know they would have reached SF had they won against South Africa. But they could not progress inspite of losing the match lol

Such things are normal for SA. Even in 1992 they lost a match they were winning because of rain.


1992 is more comical 🤣


"

The rain interruption that prompted the rain-rule to be employed and oust South Africa from the contest. In its first-ever World Cup, the side trotted to the semifinals and was well in the hunt to clinch its target of 253 in 45 overs. Needing 22 runs from 13 deliveries, the South Africans were forced to endure a rain-break that proved to be fatal. At resumption, the side needed 21 from one delivery — turning what would have been an exciting climax to an anti-climax.

The moment brought a reanalysis of the contentious rain rule that was eventually replaced by the Duckworth-Lewis (now Duckworth-Lewis-Stern) method."


their real comedy was in 2003 WC, which knocked them out in the group stages itself due to faulty calculations 🤣



"

South Africa's fatal error in reading the required target as set by the Duckworth-Lewis method. This was the home team's final contest in the group stages, and it needed to win to progress to the next stage. As in 1992, rain caused South Africa pain once again.

In the 45th over of South Africa's innings, Mark Boucher had been conveyed a target of 229, but they needed to score one more run to win. As it turned out, Boucher calmly pushed the final ball of that over to leg and did not take a single. The ball before, he had hit a six. The teams couldn't return to the pitch after the interruption as the rain had got hard.

Shaun Pollock, the captain, was seen with his hands with his head in the dressing room. In front of the home crowd, South Africa had crashed out in the first round."

TitForTat thumbnail
Navigator Thumbnail 2nd Anniversary Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: basherz


1992 is more comical 🤣


"

The rain interruption that prompted the rain-rule to be employed and oust South Africa from the contest. In its first-ever World Cup, the side trotted to the semifinals and was well in the hunt to clinch its target of 253 in 45 overs. Needing 22 runs from 13 deliveries, the South Africans were forced to endure a rain-break that proved to be fatal. At resumption, the side needed 21 from one delivery — turning what would have been an exciting climax to an anti-climax.

The moment brought a reanalysis of the contentious rain rule that was eventually replaced by the Duckworth-Lewis (now Duckworth-Lewis-Stern) method."


their real comedy was in 2003 WC, which knocked them out in the group stages itself due to faulty calculations 🤣



"

South Africa's fatal error in reading the required target as set by the Duckworth-Lewis method. This was the home team's final contest in the group stages, and it needed to win to progress to the next stage. As in 1992, rain caused South Africa pain once again.

In the 45th over of South Africa's innings, Mark Boucher had been conveyed a target of 229, but they needed to score one more run to win. As it turned out, Boucher calmly pushed the final ball of that over to leg and did not take a single. The ball before, he had hit a six. The teams couldn't return to the pitch after the interruption as the rain had got hard.

Shaun Pollock, the captain, was seen with his hands with his head in the dressing room. In front of the home crowd, South Africa had crashed out in the first round."

2003 was super funny lol

I hope rain dont spoils their party in this World cup.

Savera84 thumbnail

India

Posted: 2 years ago

Congratulations to India for winning the match.🥳

It looks like I have missed lot of fun. I fell asleep at the first rain break and woke up at the presentations.

Cheers..

JustRandomGirl thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: Medha_Sree


Is it ? Kindly explain wats Rohit Sharma folding hands doing in ur dp ? are u kept it as meme(offence) r u Rohit Sharma fan frm Bangladesh? 😆


i like to set up random things in my dp 🤣 i put that rohit dp even way before this match cause his expression is hilarious 🤣 time to change dp now 😆not rohit’s fan but i m dhoni’s fan from bd, i like dhoni more than i ever liked any bd player 😆
Viswasruti thumbnail

India

Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: Savera84

Congratulations to India for winning the match.🥳

It looks like I have missed lot of fun. I fell asleep at the first rain break and woke up at the presentations.

Cheers..

Yes, you missed a lot of fun,Raji❤️. It was a nail-biting finish, extended till the last ball.

Rain, DLS, reduced overs, modified RR, and other issues caused so many hiccups that everyone became tense. High drama in our thread, in the commentary box, on the ground as usual!😃

Viswasruti thumbnail

India

Posted: 2 years ago

Today's important encounter ---

Pakistan vs South Africa, 36th Match, Super 12 Group 2 -- 1.30 pm [IST]

Venue: Sydney Cricket Ground, Sydney

BeingBlunt thumbnail

WPL Wizzards

Posted: 2 years ago

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

That's a mineload of information. Thanks Blue jii ! ❤️

Outdated Information Everything. :) I knew everything but really wanted to see a contrasting view which is just nothing but BS bash BCCI Narrative. The article is from 2014 when in reality Big 3 revenue model was scrapped long ago. Also I will explain about the Hardwork that BCCI does and no other team does. Hopefully in the evening tonight. 👍🏼

Related Topics

Cricket Thumbnail

Posted by: Nishnesh

5 months ago

58 Crore Rupees Award to Indian CT team by BCCI+ 20 Crore by ICC

News BCCI announces INR 58 crore award for Champions Trophy winners India The ICC had already announced a cash prize of USD 2.24 million for the...

Expand ▼
Cricket Thumbnail

Posted by: Nishnesh

5 months ago

ICC Announced Combined Best Team '25 CT > The best 12 player <

Sorry to say that Guy who helped india Win Final of Chmpion trophy - Rohit Sharma who is not included in ICC'S best of 12 player CT team 1-...

Expand ▼
Cricket Thumbnail

Posted by: Savera84

7 months ago

🏏 ICC Champions Trophy 2025: Info, Schedule, Venues, Teams and more🏏

🏏 ICC Champions Trophy 2025: 19th February 2025 to 9th March 2025🏏 The 2025 ICC Champions Trophy will be the ninth edition of the ICC...

Expand ▼
Cricket Thumbnail

Posted by: Nishnesh

12 days ago

SAfrica A v NZ A 3 ODI & 2 Un-official Test at SAfrica (Aug/Sep'25)

Coming up New zealand A in SAfrica vs SAfrica A Schedule of 3 ODI 2 Un-official test Sat, 30 August, 1:30 PM SA A vs NZ A, 1st unofficial ODI...

Expand ▼
Cricket Thumbnail

Posted by: Nishnesh

12 days ago

Aus A v Ind A :2 Un-Official Test ( Lucknow) & 3 ODI.(Kanpur)

Team Aus A for Un official tests vs ind A Xavier Bartlett, Cooper Connolly, Jack Edwards, Aaron Hardie, Campbell Kellaway, Sam Konstas, Nathan...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".