looseseal thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#1
Mitron, by now I think we can all agree that SBRK is a never ending shit show. What they are showing is utter crap, there is no other way to describe it.

But what I wonder is why? Why are they white washing KuNan? Like we know Mouli is being butchered for sake of the divine lovers, but why do the makers feel the need to justify an EMA? Is it favoritism (of actors and/or characters) or is it incompetence or is it arrogance?

Is it simply because of incompetent writers? I mean is it really that hard to wrote decent characters and story? We arent demanding some visionary take on relationships, just appropriate actions and reactions from the characters. Are the makers stuck in a time where being pure meant going to temple, love meant giving flowers and gifts, where characters dont makes compromises in life but makes sacrifices in love, where forgiveness automatically means it never happened... Like is that the level of writing we can expect? Which is fine, that is standard Indian show writing tbh, but its not enough to handle topics like EMA, especially they promote the show as realistic.
Or are the makers just that arrogant about their show and idea? Like I generally get this idea when they (IF articles and actors' interviews) try and defend the show by insulting the viewers and blaming them for not understanding how progressive the show's concept is. Like do the makers really believe that what they are doing is good storytelling in any way? Are they so proud to have dared to write a show about EMA that they forgot that conceiving the idea is not enough, they have to execute it delicately as well ? Like they wanted applause just for coming up with something "progressive" (which is again not true, like many have pointed out there are many shows and movies that have dealt with the theme and done justice to it).

And then there is also the aspect that actors might not want to do negative roles; I am not saying it is or it isnt, but even if it is, are the PH and makers so weak in India that they are overruled by an actor? I mean at this point Nandini and Kunal are getting so much hate that if they are run by a bus and the show introduces new leads, the show will still not lose many fans. Also if actors do have influence over makers, wouldnt they want any decent scene or story for themselves? Moreover, why are they not favoring the character that is being loved by the majority?


Created

Last reply

Replies

30

Views

2.6k

Users

9

Likes

85

Frequent Posters

731627 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#2
u mean to say Kunal and Nandini should commit more and more mistakes .?

RockStarGirl thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#3
Not only CVs but the viewers are at fault too.
The viewers want to see their favourites as pure white characters, they try to justify and defend all their wrong doings. Most Indian audience still cannot accept grey leads and that is why CVs show such craps.
If the audience accepted that Kunal and Nandini both are wrong but pyaar kiya toh darna kiya? So let it be.. Then CVs might have shown that.
But here people would justify why Kunal and Nandini did what they did and they are not wrong.
So CVs are doing that at the expense of Mauli being turned negative.

stranger.67 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#4
The EMA that, the sooo call actors and writers are prmoting its not realistic but more about LUSTIC! I have never hate any character before as much I am hating Kunal yes, even more then Nandini.
They cannot justify anymore in any way the day they show a happily married man who is insanely crazy about his wife suddenly fall for a dancing lady in the rain!
The story plot died there.
Now no matter how much they try a audience with little brain would never watch or support sucha crap!
Edited by Unicorn67 - 6 years ago
looseseal thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: surabhi01

u mean to say Kunal and Nandini should commit more and more mistakes .?


How did you even get that from what I said? Aur waise bhi ab karna baaki ki hai hi kya?
obstinatefemale thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#6
I don't think actors hv any issue in playing negetive role .I don't know about shakti but I was reading old interview of Drashti where she said she would like to play character like Maya.And as everyone knows Maya was negetive character and this mean drashti has no problem in playing negetive role .I think we should n't upon conclusion just by seeing OLV .I do think mauli is pregnant and kunal will misunderstood her silence and will go back to nandini.Mauli will raise the child alone and in future nandini will not able to concieve as per curse of of radhika and both kunan will pin for baby.
looseseal thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: RockStarGirl

Not only CVs but the viewers are at fault too.

The viewers want to see their favourites as pure white characters, they try to justify and defend all their wrong doings. Most Indian audience still cannot accept grey leads and that is why CVs show such craps.
If the audience accepted that Kunal and Nandini both are wrong but pyaar kiya toh darna kiya? So let it be.. Then CVs might have shown that.
But here people would justify why Kunal and Nandini did what they did and they are not wrong.
So CVs are doing that at the expense of Mauli being turned negative.



Well then they shoulf have stuck to it. If they were so sure about "pyaar kiya tog darna kya" why justify it as divine? Why not just admit it they were selfish and want to be with one another? Where did Kunal once stood up for his feelings for Nandini before Nandini got kidnapped?
Problems most viewers have with the show:
1. KuNan totally forgot, and i meal totally forgot about Mouli
2. KuNan didnt come clean to Mouli, but she got them. They never had the guts to confess their betrayal. So, pyar toh kiya, par darr bhi bohot thi
3. Kunal had no explanation as to why he strayed, he suddenly says he was never in love with Mouli, huh? Writers could've have given more backstory, could've made Kunal say "listen, i need other things in life". That would have been selfish, but not as pathetic and disheartening as what the said.
4. Nandini not once thought about Mouli. How come she never asked Kunal "how can cheat on Mouli, Are you not happy with her??"

And this what i mean by incompetent writing. Where, everything is justified by "pyaar se bada koi dharm nahi"
Strike thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: TheMockingBird

I don't think actors hv any issue in playing negetive role .I don't know about shakti but I was reading old interview of Drashti where she said she would like to play character like Maya.And as everyone knows Maya was negetive character and this mean drashti has no problem in playing negetive role .I think we should n't upon conclusion just by seeing OLV .I do think mauli is pregnant and kunal will misunderstood her silence and will go back to nandini.Mauli will raise the child alone and in future nandini will not able to concieve as per curse of of radhika and both kunan will pin for baby.


I would like to add here that Shakti has played negative characters in past. And even in Meri Aashiqui he did played the negative role of twin brother of Ranveer i.e Milan.
So it's not the case that actors don't want to or can't play negative characters i think.
If the makers and the writer is doing such a botch and horrible job of writing solid grey shaded characters that audience almost sees them in negative, then can't fault actors for that.
731627 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#9
u r saying cvs r white washing Nandini
so what u mean by this .?
looseseal thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: TheMockingBird

I don't think actors hv any issue in playing negetive role .I don't know about shakti but I was reading old interview of Drashti where she said she would like to play character like Maya.And as everyone knows Maya was negetive character and this mean drashti has no problem in playing negetive role .I think we should n't upon conclusion just by seeing OLV .I do think mauli is pregnant and kunal will misunderstood her silence and will go back to nandini.Mauli will raise the child alone and in future nandini will not able to concieve as per curse of of radhika and both kunan will pin for baby.


Idk anything about the actors either. Again, I am not accusing them of anything. They as actors have the right to choose what kind of role they wanna play. My point is, even if an actor doesnt want o do a particular role, why would the PH be so mellow and give in? LIke, even if we assume Nandini is being white washed because they wanna keep DD, isnt there a better way to do it? Not just the fact Nandini being whit washed is annoying, the way they are doing is so bad that we hate KuNAn even more now. They wanted to white wash Nandini, they should have let the 3 go on their own journey and later make Kunal and Nandini apologize to Mouli separately. It is only one of the way. I am no writer. I am sure better writer and story teller could come with dozens more and better ways KuNan could have been redeemed.

This is what I am not getting. Why are they (the makers) doing what they are doing? I mean tell me who has changed their mind on KuNAn because of their "sacrifice"? Mouli may have lost fans, but KuNan hasnt gained any either. They are losing more and more fans.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".