Why had Aamir named his dog after Shahrukh? - Page 12

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

chalo...u agreed with me...aur saath mein aapke dil ko thandak bhi mil gayi Shahrukh ko kutta keh kar😆😆

#180degreeturn😆

"Why had Aamir named his dog after Shahrukh?" ab kutte ka naam shahrukh hai to hum kya kare ... aamir naam pasand hi nahi aaya kutte ko aapke shabdo main kahe to beizzati kar di aamir ki 😛😆 but aamir wale kutte ne Shahrukh naam leke Shahrukh ko izzat baksh di 😆

shayd aapko thandak mili ho kutte ke aamir naam reject karne pe isliye tussi aisa soch rahe hoo 😆

Originally posted by: anonymous39

[quote]He apologized??😲...well that was good on his part👍🏼

[/quote]

^Sort of. He claimed he didn't owe SRK an apology but that he called SRK's kids and apologized for trying to humiliate their father.

Originally posted by: anonymous39

Aamir didn't name the dog in the first place. If he did, it would have been more repulsive. Dogs are cute but you cannot name them based on your coworker. It's weird and creepy.

He got the dog with the property. The old owner was a SRK fan and named the dog that. There was nothing wrong in that. Aamir tried to be funny (which he isn't at all) and wrote insulting sounding lines like "SRK is licking my feet, I have to feed SRK a biscuit, heel boy heel" and other stuff like that.

His intent was malicious but he tried to cover it up with humor. Sometimes that can work if you're actually funny but he's not and has never been. It created a controversy and he looked really bad and so he had to apologize publicly to put an end to all the bad stories in the media about his behavior.

Lol, so true. Aamir may be number one now cos his movies succeed, but neither he has the mass hysteria when SRK was on top (it was pretty unbelievable how everyone only talked about SRK, he ruled in the true sense) and nor Aamir has the charisma, wit, class, razor-sharp intelligence and attractive personality that SRK has. SRK has it all 😎 + he has millions of women who love him for being such a gentleman. Aamir has so many skeletons in his closet but no one even bothers to talk about it cos he's literally that dull 😆

^Eh.. he pretty much got forced into apologizing. He was getting trashed daily everywhere. He really shot himself in the foot with that one.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.

Since you pointed fingers at DESIS hence my response...just like Indian audience ko koi kuchh bol they...then people are up in arms...ki INDIAN audience ko kyon bola...kya audience intelligent nahi hai...same pinch...people know what is said in good faith...and what is said with an intention to insult...😛

Is this a Bollywood forum or a naming forum? 😆😆

Naturally on a bollywood forum Indian audience is mentioned for every movie release every Friday. That is a lot of "pointing fingers" at INDIAN audience calling them uneducated for watching a movie. If some people have no problem with it, then there will also be some who express their opinion on the constant pointing fingers at indian audience.

Yes, I am "pointing fingers" at desis saying desis are getting offended over the name of a dog and I backed it up by saying sometimes dogs are treated carelessly in our country.

Originally posted by: anonymous39

Aamir didn't name the dog in the first place. If he did, it would have been more repulsive. Dogs are cute but you cannot name them based on your coworker. It's weird and creepy.

He got the dog with the property. The old owner was a SRK fan and named the dog that. There was nothing wrong in that. Aamir tried to be funny (which he isn't at all) and wrote insulting sounding lines like "SRK is licking my feet, I have to feed SRK a biscuit, heel boy heel" and other stuff like that.

His intent was malicious but he tried to cover it up with humor. Sometimes that can work if you're actually funny but he's not and has never been. It created a controversy and he looked really bad and so he had to apologize publicly to put an end to all the bad stories in the media about his behavior.

Frankly, I know a lot of people who love dogs and name them after people. Let me clarify saying both desis and non-desis since earlier I was seen as pointing fingers at desis.