This forum is absurdly biased

Hi...welcome to the forum...

Hahaha hahaha omg
Dear are you serious...

For us this forum is [SHRAMAN]


No one are biased...

Representing different perspectives about the particular scene (just like party scene) is what you called biased...

No dear...,,whatever we may discuss about the episode /particular scene...
But at the end of the day...shraman shraman and only shraman...

Let's not make this forum battle ground

@TM - We have a very peaceful forum & calling out to the forum members like that, is just going to create unnecessary fights, so I suggest we stick to discussing the content matter of this show.

^^ Shravan and Suman exist as two individual characters at the moment rather than some conjoined puzzle pieces. It's disingenuous to erase their existence as singular characters and the nuances in favour of some abstract coupling. What I meant to say was there is a distinct lack of discourse when it comes Shravan as a character and I wonder if this would be the same were the situations reversed. Bias is used fairly figuratively in this case which I have stated in my original post so I don't understand why I need to explain this again.

Hey welcome to the forum. I think I saw you in dym forum in early days. I don't think forum is baised all are expressing their povs. And there is some people who thinks what ever sumo did was wrong and shravan justified showing sumo what she was before. Sumo should know that how awfully she behaved with shravan. She can't get out it hurting a person who badly effected and hurted because of her behavior . I guess All are OK with it shravan showing mirror to sumo but the public humiliation could have avoided it. And I agree sumo hurt is nothing compare to shravan hurt. People are concerned he is planned and plotted but what he can do he can't say sumo that hello sumo I want to plan insult you in the party so come in time. Of course he will make sure sumo come to the party other wise. Well I am hoping that this show is different and don't justify sumo actions because she was young and ya she was typical daily soap heroine and what ever they do it all justifies. Suman was wrong period there is no justification. Suman young ya she didn't planned it doesn't matter end of the day her actions hurted another person and she have no right to do that. And I think shravan Aldi should not say that she is gold digger other wise it was OK the confrontation was much needed for both of them to understand to each other.

I really liked your povs in dym forum the earlier days. I hope you continue writing your pov in this forum too. It's good to have conservative criticism and good to read every one thoughts about the show

Originally posted by: Star_girl

I am a very casual viewer and I do not want treat the whole forum as a monolith but this forum is so ridiculously biased against Shravan, it's almost funny. Suman was absolutely awful towards Shravan during their teenage years and for very little reason. She was superficial, classicist and displayed all the signs of a classic narcissist.

And I do not want to treat this forum as an entity, but most of us disapproved of Suman because of that.

This is not to say Shravan isn't problematic and needs to let go of things but people are so absurdly eager to paint Shravan as some kind of a monstrous villain, it's baffling. Shravan is actually a rather refreshing hero with a sense of fairness, yeah, it goes out of the window when it comes to Suman but he was literally in love. It's quite plausible that he won't think straight and has nurtured the resentment because Suman was kind of his "One that got away" person. There is such a blatant lack of nuanced discussion when it comes to Shravan, it's strange.

And yeah, I agree about the part of Shravan being a refreshing hero and I don't think we tried to paint Shravan as a monstrous villian. As many before me pointed out, we rather like him.

Suman is not wonderful, she is just as problematic as Shravan, except she has kinda overcome her awfulness. That alone cannot absolve her from blame at all. Shravan has valid reasons to feel the way he does, is his response to his frustrated infatuation messy? Yes. But that is really the sign of an interesting hero.

In any case, this show is most probably following the narrative of Jane Austen's Persuasion and I am surprised nobody has pointed that out yet. Shravan is clearly the Wentworth to Suman's Anne. Sorry I will probably not be around to respond to any replies if I get any but feel free to launch a discourse war of sorts.

Originally posted by: Star_girl

^^ Shravan and Suman exist as two individual characters at the moment rather than some conjoined puzzle pieces. It's disingenuous to erase their existence as singular characters and the nuances in favour of some abstract coupling. What I meant to say was there is a distinct lack of discourse when it comes Shravan as a character and I wonder if this would be the same were the situations reversed. Bias is used fairly figuratively in this case which I have stated in my original post so I don't understand why I need to explain this again.

Also, let's not stop contradictory conversations when it comes to characters. That hardly makes any place a "battleground". I am sure people here are old enough to engage in an explanation of Sharavan's motivation. I wish to talk about Shravan as an individual character and not his potential coupling with Suman.

Your right about Persuasion. I am surprised being a hard core JA fan I didn't think of it. Maybe because I have not read Persuasion in a long time. But yes, Shravan had his reasons for doing what he did. Just like Wentworth came back still harboring feelings for Anne but eager to show her otherwise. The same applies here too. The main difference is that they were engaged for a short time and Anne was "persuaded" to break off the engagement by her family.

Originally posted by: rekha.366

Hey welcome to the forum. I think I saw you in dym forum in early days. I don't think forum is baised all are expressing their povs. And there is some people who thinks what ever sumo did was wrong and shravan justified showing sumo what she was before. Sumo should know that how awfully she behaved with shravan. She can't get out it hurting a person who badly effected and hurted because of her behavior . I guess All are OK with it shravan showing mirror to sumo but the public humiliation could have avoided it. And I agree sumo hurt is nothing compare to shravan hurt. People are concerned he is planned and plotted but what he can do he can't say sumo that hello sumo I want to plan insult you in the party so come in time. Of course he will make sure sumo come to the party other wise. Well I am hoping that this show is different and don't justify sumo actions because she was young and ya she was typical daily soap heroine and what ever they do it all justifies. Suman was wrong period there is no justification. Suman young ya she didn't planned it doesn't matter end of the day her actions hurted another person and she have no right to do that. And I think shravan Aldi should not say that she is gold digger other wise it was OK the confrontation was much needed for both of them to understand to each other.

I really liked your povs in dym forum the earlier days. I hope you continue writing your pov in this forum too. It's good to have conservative criticism and good to read every one thoughts about the show