Should Amrita Rao have been a bigger star?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

WickedSlayer

@TheSlayer

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 9 years ago

#31

Nope. No screen presence, no acting skills, and above all, poor dialog delivery, cadence, diction, etc... Priyanka, Deepika, etc. are a complete package. When they speak, they grab our attention.

Quote

_SJ_

@_SJ_

Voyager

Posted: 9 years ago

#32

she is very pretty...liked her a lot...but she lacked something...may be this is called fate..

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Larae

@Larae

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: Rangeelaa
eh, she was never an amazing actress, she was ok.
I always found her voice/tone a little annoying but she was beautiful.

Also didn't she have a bit of an attitude, I remember some controversy of her and Esha deol, like she was rude to someone and Esha slapped her.

Ditto. I couldn't sit through her movies because her high pitched voice got on my nerves.

Quote

Mallika-E-Bhais

@Mallika-E-Bhais

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

#34

Apparently she just didn't have luck on her side though she did all the things that starlets do to make it big in BW wink wink!!! But she had a very conservative approach to her on-screen image & rejected some very nice movies. She's beautiful, good dancer & acts very well! Hope her TV show does very very well.

Quote

.Sunrise.

@.Sunrise.

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#35

She does look young
She was supposed to do Krissh
She did a look test with Hrithik( there is a picture on net I guess)
Rakesh thought she looked really young and ironically the movie went to Priyanka who is a year younger than Amrita :D
In 2013 she did jolly llb and Satyagraha
Almost wasted on both movies
but there are few scenes on these movies which actually shows that Amrita is quite a natural actress