Why did Hrithik's contemporaries fail?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

bollykudi

@bollykudi

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

#31

Because Fardeen, Uday, Tushar, Aftab, Zayed Khan and Abhishek can't act well. And their looks were not enough to have enough of a female following. As for the rest:

Jimmy Shergill: really good actor but perhaps doesn't have the "looks" and luck isn't on his side to get signed for all the critical roles.

Arjun: He did have a rise in the middle but I don't think his acting has improved much.

John: He was known as the "hottest" male celeb for a while and gives hits every now and then so I wouldn't say he failed necessarily.

Madhavan: Great actor. Not conventionally attractive. ;/

Quote

Rangaaa

@Rangaaa

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#32

because they weren't talented like HR who is a good actor and a good dancer...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

AllBlacks1

@AllBlacks1

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: Fiery.Phoenix.

You mean rain of tears naa ? 😆
No worries, e-napkins for all those who cry cuz of our feiry comments...😆

I didnt know so many ppl here r fans other ex stars. 😆

Dheere dheere se ... mat jalna

Do it faster. Big bang theory ke terha. 😉

OT- Yeah, HR is the only one in his age group. There r khans n Akshay and Ajay and then there Varun to shahid.

Its a golden era for HR... but he is either 200% on or big 0. He can rule this decade if wants to. DEkhte hain. Hope he looks after his health.

Quote

@DB_reloaded

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 10 years ago

#34

coz they werent ugly as HR

Quote

1043801

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#35

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

I didnt know so many ppl here r fans other ex stars. 😆

Dheere dheere se ... mat jalna
Do it faster. Big bang theory ke terha. 😉

Hmmm, how old are you ?
Regardless, have a napkin. It'll help soak up the tears FASTER...

P.S: #PaPaRoshan #ToTheRescue #BigFan

Quote

AllBlacks1

@AllBlacks1

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#36

Originally posted by: Fiery.Phoenix.

Hmmm, how old are you ?
Regardless, have a napkin. It'll help soak up the tears FASTER...

P.S: #PaPaRoshan #ToTheRescue #BigFan

Oh Fiery my honey, u have to do much worse than that. 🤗

HR's best performance.. hmmm, Is it Agneepath, Dhoom2, JA, Lakshya, Guzarish????

Papa Roshan had nothing do with that. 😭

Im turning 35 in 2 days. But I m still achild at heart. 😃

Quote

swati82

@swati82

Dazzler

Posted: 10 years ago

#37

Always thought Fardeen was decent enough. He wasn't expectional but he could give an expression and deliver a dialogue and had the looks. Shame he never made it.

The late 90's early 2000's wasn't the greatest time to debut. Khan's were still looking young, they had the attraction of the youth. There wasn't a real demand for young stars then. Hrithik was the exception to the rule, he just had it all from day one. People say Shahid isn't lucky but if anything the guy is extremely lucky he was able to stay somewhat afloat in that time period.

Ranbir, Varun, Sid etc these new guys are lucky. They debuted at time where the Khan's may still be reiging, but there's a new generation of kids and teenagers who are looking for youthful idols and stars.

Edited by swati82 - 10 years ago

Quote

Resident_Evil

@Resident_Evil

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#38

Because 2000-2009 was a shitty era in Bollywood.

Quote

Zazzie

@.Bongsookie.

Sparkler

Posted: 10 years ago

#39

Jimmy Shergill isn't a failure. He's not. The guy took the opportunity when it came and became a big name up north.

All the star kids flopped, i'm so glad. 😆