Judge vs. Judge - Round 4 - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

66

Views

6.5k

Users

19

Frequent Posters

atria thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#61
So to sum up....

The issues we seem to have addressed are--

1. Are controversies real or engineered for TRPs.

They are mostly real but minor issues which are spiced up (often beyond recognition) by the channel.

2. Are controversies necessary for TRPs?

Because there is so much competition among the reality shows these days, controversies cannot be avoided altogether, since it is undeniable that a large number of people like controversies. However, too much controversies may result in people losing interest in the singing etc, so when the controversies become slightly less, peoples interest in the program may also die down, and that would affect the TRPs adversely. So a little bit of controversy, within limits, is okay, but not at the expense of the singing.

3. Are controversies just good entertainment or can they have negative consequences for the people participating in the show?

They do affect the chances of the candidates because people vote for personalities not just the singing capabilities. Non-controversial candidates are at a disadvantage in the beginning because they are relatively unknown than the others and may not get much support. On the other hand, controversial candidates have less chance in the final stages because then people may choose a non-controversial candidate over a controversial one. Since most controversies are very minor to begin with, it seems unfair that they should affect the contestants chances in this way.
Edited by atria - 18 years ago
*Ajju* thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#62


My response in purple color
atria thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#63
Uffff too many colours, I'm back to black. Not much argument in there, just reinforcing previous statements.😊

Originally posted by: *Ajju*



My response in purple color

atria thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#64
Okay, I have to leave now, it was great debating with all you people. May the best one win.👏
Edited by atria - 18 years ago
mango-frost thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#65
ill leave the debate open till 2moro morning my time...

meaning...another 12 hours from now...

becuz ajju made a late entry...isiliye to be fair 😊
*Ajju* thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#66

Originally posted by: atria

So to sum up....

The issues we seem to have addressed are--

1. Are controversies real or engineered for TRPs.

They are mostly real but minor issues which are spiced up (often beyond recognition) by the channel.

2. Are controversies necessary for TRPs?

Because there is so much competition among the reality shows these days, controversies cannot be avoided altogether, since it is undeniable that a large number of people like controversies. However, too much controversies may result in people losing interest in the singing etc, so when the controversies become slightly less, peoples interest in the program may also die down, and that would affect the TRPs adversely. So a little bit of controversy, within limits, is okay, but not at the expense of the singing.

3. Are controversies just good entertainment or can they have negative consequences for the people participating in the show?

They do affect the chances of the candidates because people vote for personalities not just the singing capabilities. Non-controversial candidates are at a disadvantage in the beginning because they are relatively unknown than the others and may not get much support. On the other hand, controversial candidates have less chance in the final stages because then people may choose a non-controversial candidate over a controversial one. Since most controversies are very minor to begin with, it seems unfair that they should affect the contestants chances in this way.



atria good points and just wanna add few more -

1.We all agreed controvarsaries are real in start infact they are not at all controvarsaries when they start but channel converts small issues into controvarsaries for TRP /for making show more dramatic and more intresting .But sometimes controvarsaries do have negative impact on show .

2.Are they neccessary ?yes and no I mean some people will say they all enjoy watching controvarsal stuff /fights on show while some will say they only care about singing but if you in show's creative team then you have to consider all kind of audiances.As I said before controvarsaries /conflicts/drama adds TRP as well as increases Votes too.

3.Controvarsaries do have good and bad impact on contestant.Sometimes people might misunderstand contestants because of the small clips channel is showing .Also some contestant might get really positive response and he/she may not be deserving for that .Finally its all about Destiny here too and luck plays important part .

4.Another point I wanna add is whethere these controvarsal stuff is fair to audiances and contestants ? For audiance point of view it might be fair as some people only care about drama and entertainment but on contestants I don't think its fair .I mean it might affect them very badly and channel might give really bad image to some contestant.If its positive image then fine but think about negative image ...I am sure there might few contestants from reality show for him the show turned out one ugly episode in their life.Channel's should not use contestants just for TRP I mean its not debating topic but just my view.

5.Last point is how much IF and people view match in reality shows ?Why I am writing this point because some might say they don't care about controvarsal stuff and they look only for good things but remember IF has mostly level headed people and I am not comparing people here but I wanna say IF is not about masses as such and as a channel they have to care about masses as well as classes( Its not generlized statement as such ) .I have seen so many times that IF's view and the voring results doesn't match and thats because IF represents one section of community ie internet community .So even lot of people will think its not required , we need to consider other sections of people in society.

As atria said May best win but one thing is sure I really had lot of fun while reading and writinge here ...Good job atria , Teardrops and xaphan👏👏

@Megha thanks for extending the deadline ...this might be my final post in debating ...so take care and have fun guys

asmauk thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#67

Originally posted by: *Ajju*


Asma how you doin buddy ? u looks busy now days ...haven't seen u online from last week
Thank you so much .....atleast someone is there to support and that makes a huge difference 😛 Here is one Udit Ji's song for you

Nahi Samze hai woh hame to kya jata hai
Hari Bazi ko Jeetna hume Aata hai
Niklenge maidan me jis din hum zoomke
Dharti bolegi ye kadam chumke
Yaha ke hum sikandar ..............

my pleaseure aajjjuuuuuuu......am busy with my wedding shopping.......am getting married in August😭😳

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".