BOI: why SRK's run is not as big as Salman or Rajesh khanna (N:Pg 54) - Page 2

Originally posted by: DB_reloaded

well his stardom lasted only a decade u have to score years after years

so 10 great years of Kevin peitersen is not equal to 25 years of Sachin

who's rajesh 😛

Originally posted by: HooLiGaN

who's rajesh 😛

Originally posted by: DB_reloaded

yes bigB has outscored all his predecessors and contemporaries

may be for u but in my opinoin its rajesh first then big b 😊 u can disagree all fine bro 👍🏼

Originally posted by: realitybites

In the end what matters is the whole career span and popularity.The goodwill in the industry is also important these days.[/DIV]</font>

You got it dude 😆 ⭐️

Originally posted by: fire_gun

mat dala kar aise article...bollywood forum is now anti-salman den ..kuch aisa daalega toh joote padenge...salman kabhi ek number nahi hoga yehi rule hai yaha..samjh le tu..

😆

Originally posted by: fire_gun

mat dala kar aise article...bollywood forum is now anti-salman den ..kuch aisa daalega toh joote padenge...salman kabhi ek number nahi hoga yehi rule hai yaha..samjh le tu..

baat to ek dum soo taka theek ha 😆

Originally posted by: blue-ice

You got it dude 😆 ⭐️

Originally posted by: HooLiGaN

may be for u but in my opinoin its rajesh first then big b 😊 u can disagree all fine bro 👍🏼

Originally posted by: DB_reloaded

Rajesh did ghanta job in the 80s same for dharam paji

similarly Salman went into hibernation in the 2000s

SRK might not have given huge blockbusters but he has been consistent ever since

every1 can have a phase but convert that into a lifetime is a different ball game