BOI: why SRK's run is not as big as Salman or Rajesh khanna (N:Pg 54)

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

643898

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#41

Originally posted by: DB_reloaded
I'm sure rajesh khanna films were mix of hits super hits and BB not only BB so SRK has been giving hits since 2006 so thats a run too😆 y dunt count those

cos SRK's hits werent as big as rajesh khanna's

This run is only bettered by a run by Rajesh Khanna which lasted 15 months from October 69 till February 71 which consisted of 9 consecutive major hits including six blockbuster/super hit films There have been other runs where male leads have given 5-6 consecutive hits but these two runs stand out in magnitude.

Quote

643898

Hibernated

Posted: 11 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: KARAN888
Rajesh Khanna's 15 run doesn't contain a single BB 😆 there are Hits and SuperHits.
While SRK's 11 run contains 3 back to back Blockbusters.

2 back to back BBs. CDI is now a superhit
http://www.boxofficeindia.com/Star_Cast/actor_detail/shahrukh_khan/actor

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

@DB_reloaded

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: blue-ice

Of course its a run...and it will stop only if HNY is a FLOP...

how can they compare rajesh khanan's hits to salman 5 BBs

why not take akshay kumar 5 back to back hits(Bhagham bhag namastey london Hey baby BB welcome) in space of 1 year? i think thats more credible

Edited by DB_reloaded - 11 years ago

Quote

901054

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#44

Of course SRK's streak is good but it does not compare to the feat of giving 1 ATBB and 4 consecutive BB's back to back. Honestly, it's not hard to comprehend.