Tomiris - Page 2

Originally posted by: truekrpkabian

And Tomiris was not an Indian Queen!!Cyrus the Great never reached India.Look below

Tomyris (/tomrs/; from Eastern Iranian: Tahm-Rayi),^[1] also called Thomyris, Tomris, Tomiride, or Queen Tomiri, was a Massagetean ruler who reigned over the Massagetae, an Iranian people from Scythian pastoral-nomadic confederation of Central Asia east of the Caspian Sea, in parts of modern-day Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, western Uzbekistan, and southern Kazakhstan.^[2][3][4][5] Tomyris led her armies to defend against an attack by Cyrus the Great of the Achaemenid Empire, and defeated and killed him in 530 BC

You are insulting our great king Puru by referring him to as a descendant of Queen Tomyris .He was a true Indian and you can ignore the theory of us Indians being Aryans originally from Europe as taught in our history books.Because our history was written by Westerners who want to falsely glorify themselves and make us Indians look inferior to them.The Aryan theory is rubbish!!!

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Nor is it necessarily true that there was nothing written concerning the history and the rulers and kingdoms of what was then Bharat. There must certainly have been a very large number of manuscripts dealing, inter alia, with these subjects, quite apart from the folk traditions.

What do you suppose that the history departments of the very famous universities like Nalanda and Takshashila did? They all had huge libraries, and it is only logical to assume that they must have had substantial sections dealing with the history of Bharat.

Unfortunately, the library at Takshashila was destroyed during the barbarian invasions from Central Asia in the 10th to the 12th centuries, and Nalanda by Bakhtiar Khilji in the 14th century. The great library at Nalanda reportedly burned for 3 months.

It is thus not surprising that no contemporary or somewhat later accounts of the period survived. But they surely existed.

Finally, I have never heard of the territory that constitutes the Indian subcontinent being considered part of the Persian empire.

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: luckySnow

poras wasn't playing for Akhand bharat 😳 as shown here...have you read history of Punjab...poras was punjabi ..Paurva rashtra was punjab region..and first read history of Punjab...Archamedians attacked Punjab several times..ok ...chill down... Wikipedia articles are not everthing...and how is it an insult to porus Tomiris is considered as the greatest woman of ancient times...Read the history of dhaiya. history of jatts ...Queen Tomiris had her state upto Indus...read horodtus...😛

Originally posted by: truekrpkabian

King Puru was a punjabi!!Hahahaha😆 good joke.I wonder why I never read or heard about "Bhangra" being a dance form of ancient India.You amuse me.There was no Punjab in ancient India.Punjabis came into existence when Sikhism took birth as a religion.And you never know or will never get to know that whether King Puru was passionate about Akhand Bharat,he may not have the vision of Akhand Bharat,but he did believe in Bharat.He didn't betrayed and surrendered to Alexander as that bloody traitor Ambiraj did.He stopped the further advance of Alexander into our country.He broke the morale of Alexanders' army ultimately breaking the aspiration of Alexander.The region later became Punjab.Queen Tomyris was a brave commander and I admire and respect her for that.But you related King Puru to her thereby questioning his ethnicity and nationality.

Originally posted by: luckySnow

You are a insolent person...yes he was Punjabi..Punjab is not a latest word...

Now I don't want to argue with one who reads only Wikipedia articles and has Eroded knowledge about history 😆