i agree to an extent.
manav only believed shivu AFTER he saw all of the evidence. manav isnt psychic, how should he know that the evidence was intended to be against ajeet. this is business, and even though ajeet is family, manav had to look at the evidence of foul play and come to a conclusion that made sense.
it wasnt about believing shivu. it was about observing the evidence and coming to a conclusion.
though i agree, manav shouldnt have looked at past mistakes of ajeet to prove his point of ajeet being wrong.
i dont mean to offend you. but this is my opinon