Waah Archu-waah - Page 5

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

totally agree with niki . She has shown guts and refused to get engaged to Satish in front of ALL

Originally posted by: Arien_03

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

These same decent folk had not cared for society and taken Archu back home on two occasions(and both times it was in case of Manav, a mechanic, who was never wanted as Son-in-law)- first when they found that they had been tricked during ArMan marriage, and later when they found that Manav was characterless. They might have done a lot of mistakes, but one thing is for sure- they can never let their daughter marry a bad man who doesn't have right intentions towards her, -

They would not have cared about society and would have called off the marriage if they were told the truths about Jay by Satish(and what if Dharmesh falisified Satish's claim telling that he always had problems with Jaywant and he always favored Manav over Jaywant. Who would Karanjkars believe if they'd to choose between Dharmesh and Satish? What if Satish bringing out truth about Jaywant created problems between Satish and Dharmesh.)- Karanjkars trust Satish so much.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

If she ran away there would be badnaami, if she stayed back and marriage was called off there would be badnaami, if she stayed back and got married to Jaywant and got dumped by him after 1 yr there would be even more badnaami. There was no escape from badnaami.
Completely disagree. If had stayed and marriage was called off by Karanjkars, then the badnaami would have been of Jay, not Archu- that he was a sinister guy who intended to ruin the girl's voice. People would have gossiped about the Rane family, not the Karanjkars, like they were doing today. They wouldn't have been raising questions about Archu or Sulochana's sanskars. They would in fact have been synpathising with her. She wouldn't have been blamed AT ALL.

Originally posted by: Arien_03

When a marriage is called of, whatever maybe the reason, whichever party is at fault, both party face badnaami and then they sling mud at each other. They are not going to take Satish and his proof everywhere to stop people from gossiping. Even if girl is not at fault, she'll hv more problem in getting married again than a boy, thats Indian society.

I doubt Karanjkars would go to the extent of explaining the guests the reason behind calling off marriage to avoid all tamasha that would follow. And if they believe in giving explaination they can give when Satish decides to reveal them the truth. I think Satish is at fault for keeping the truth from Karanjkars.

Originally posted by: Arien_03

I doubt Karanjkars would go to the extent of explaining the guests the reason behind calling off marriage to avoid all tamasha that would follow. And if they believe in giving explaination they can give when Satish decides to reveal them the truth. I think Satish is at fault for keeping the truth from Karanjkars.Why can't they explain? It takes one line to say the truth- they need not give a speech. Today in one line Jay's father said there will be no wedding cos bride ran away. In the same way, Karanjkars could also have declared that there will be no wedding cos it has been found out that the boy is cheating our family and our daughter.

All I'm saying that Archana didn't think rationally, she just acted upon Saitsh conviction. Satish is such a balanced guy, if he is asking Archana to take such extreme step then there must be a reason behind it.That is what I have been saying all this while 😊 that Archu behaved rashly. She should have been a bit more rational about the whole scenario, cos running away from home is a very big decision. Of course, Satish is to be blamed too for making things so messy.