~| Whatever you want to argue about - 2 |~ - Page 25

Created

Last reply

Replies

611

Views

25.3k

Users

11

Likes

366

Frequent Posters

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


Magadh & chedi supported Pandavas right as Vijaya & karenumati were from there

That was during the war. I was saying at the time of Draupadi Swayamwar

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Draupadi's marriage to Krishna would mean for Drupad


1) Marriage to someone who isn't a king or crown prince. Their land has no king but a chief so no near possibility of becoming one soon

2) Alliance with a treacherous man, coward and murderer of a king

3) Enimity to Jarasangh the most powerful king of his time

4) Anger of multiple states including Chedi, Vidarbha, and Salwa. Kuru were already enemy. So it's like getting surrounded by enemies


Only positive outcome possibility of regaining Uttar Panchal and killing Drona, that too wasn't a must because Uttar Panchal was a Hastinapur protectorate and they had good terms with Jarasangh n his vassals, and hence no assurance that they would be successful. Aside I doubt Krishna himself would have been in mood to gain additional enemies at this stage


Why on the earth would Drupad accept this alliance

I agree. Someone said that if krishna married drapaudi then she wouldn't have been queen. I was explaining that if the marriage somehow did happen then for all the political reasons drapaudi would have been the queen since if drapaud is going to support krishna s claim for the imperial throne he will want for his daughter. That s all. Rest i agree krishna s reputation wouldn't have permitted the alliance

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

Jarasandh was the powerful right ?? He was krishna s biggest enemy right ?? Krishna needed alliance to tackle him right ?? The rivalry having something do with kansa s death who was jarasandh s SIL. Right??

So if krishna marries drapaud s daughter. And drapaud pitches in his army to support krishna s claim to the imperial throne and against jarasandh he would want his daughter to be queen right ??


Here reason for enimity with jarasandh is mentioned -

Some time after when king Kansa was slain by Vasudeva, an enmity arose between him and Krishna. Then, O Bharata, the mighty king of Magadha from his city of Girivraja, whirling a mace ninety-nine times, hurled it towards Mathura. At that time Krishna of wonderful deeds was residing at Mathura. The handsome mace hurled by Jarasandha fell near Mathura at a distance of ninety-nine yojanas from Gririvraja The citizens beholding the circumstance well, went unto Krishna and informed him of the fall of the mace. The place where the mace fell is adjacent to Mathura and is called Gadavasan. Jarasandha had two supporters called Hansa and Dimvaka, both of whom were incapable of being slain by weapons. Well-conversant with the science of politics and morality, in counsel they were the foremost of all intelligent men. I have already told thee everything about that mighty pair. They two and Jarasandha, I believe, are more than a match for three worlds. O brave king, it was for this reason that the powerful Kukkura, Andhaka and Vrishni tribes, acting from motives of policy, did not deem it proper to fight with him.'"

But why would Drupad want this to happen? If he was actually capable of imperial campaign, wouldn't he try on his own? He wasn't that capable to fight Jarasangh

Agni_Jytsona thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

But why would Drupad want this to happen? If he was actually capable of imperial campaign, wouldn't he try on his own? He wasn't that capable to fight Jarasangh

Read my about post. Someone talked who would have been the queen if krishna married panchali. Ofcourse panchali since drapaud had the most power among all krishna s in laws


About why drapaud didn't tried for imperial campaign. Because he would have definitely faced resistance from kuru another powerful kingdom. I don't think drapaud wanted them merging the kingdom together was a better option which is what they did.

Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

But why would Drupad want this to happen? If he was actually capable of imperial campaign, wouldn't he try on his own? He wasn't that capable to fight Jarasangh


Krishna ki problem internal bhi thi from balram & kritvarma & other Yadavs , as chiilii said he was all alone .


He both problems internal & external both

Edited by deepikagupta9 - 5 years ago
NoraSM thumbnail
Sparkler Thumbnail 6th Anniversary Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago

I don't understand how Krishna with Panchal army would have defeated Jarasandh when -


1 Pandavas defeated Panchal and it was divided in half, The reason Drupad adopted Dristatumya and Draupadi


2 Jarasandh was killed by Bhima, What did Panchal or Draupadi's marriage to them had to do with this? It was Krishna's plan

NoraSM thumbnail
Sparkler Thumbnail 6th Anniversary Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago


As it is stated that Pandu might have died long before birth of Yudi, We know Pandavas are not Pandu’s sons, The divine birth theory makes sense when one believes in divinity, It would have been easier for Everyone if Pandu had returned to his kingdom with his son, why didn’t he? He was the King

why wouldn’t people believe that Pandavas are his sons? They couldn’t perform a paternity test

Edited by NoraSM - 5 years ago
Fruitcustard_9 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: NoraSM

I don't understand how Krishna with Panchal army would have defeated Jarasandh when -


1 Pandavas defeated Panchal and it was divided in half, The reason Drupad adopted Dristatumya and Draupadi


2 Jarasandh was killed by Bhima, What did Panchal or Draupadi's marriage to them had to do with this? It was Krishna's plan


Krishna already defeated jarasandh 18 times but he wanted permanent solution that's with his plan bheem killed jarasandh.

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

Read my about post. Someone talked who would have been the queen if krishna married panchali. Ofcourse panchali since drapaud had the most power among all krishna s in laws


About why drapaud didn't tried for imperial campaign. Because he would have definitely faced resistance from kuru another powerful kingdom. I don't think drapaud wanted them merging the kingdom together was a better option which is what they did.

Yes got your Point now


About the second part that's exactly what I said, they weren't capable by then

Edited by FlauntPessimism - 5 years ago
FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Screen Detective Participant Thumbnail ICC T20 CWC 2024 Match Winner Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9


Krishna ki problem internal bhi thi from balram & kritvarma & other Yadavs , as chiilii said he was all alone .


He both problems internal & external both

.

I know about Yadav problem, the he in my original comment meant Drupad and not Krishna

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".