Why Mahabharat continues to fascinate - Page 9

Originally posted by: JustMySelf

dont beat me up 4 saying all these 😆 bt what fascinates me most is that there is a strong possibility that d actual facts of mahabharat cd hv been erased from real history n fabricated storys cd hv been made to record down so that d future generations can not question the legality of yudhisthir inheriting d throne.

n b4 any of u jump on me i pray u question urselves..y wd famous ppl like karna bheeshma vidhur remain silent if draupadi was really disrobed?y do d versions vary at places or lack in consistency when talking abt d VH?sum places say d dress slipped sum say pulled sum says disrobed if krishna was realy a real char nt a figment of imagination then y in d 1st place wd he nt cum at that very instant when dushshasan even gt hold of draupadi?if krishna provided cloths to draupadi really so d ppl saw miracle infront their eyes..wdnt they hv understood its divine doing?hw cd even then drona bheesma vidhur nt speak out or reanounce thr services to d royal court?who gv yudhisthir right to bet on his bros n d common wife as if they were his property to gamble away?if 4 d sake of winning d war a supposedly truthful yudhisthir cd lie that ashathama is dead then cdnt he hv lied at other times too?a lie told willingly n knowing d facts is more sinful than a lie told at d blurt of d moment isnt it?so if a man to serve his purpose disarm a man by his well planned lie then cnt we ask hw much wd u really bliv in yudhisthir in real life?also d fact that pandavas were never pandus son..bt gods blessings..so hw can their right to d throne arise?even technically pandu ws given d throne as dhriti was blind bt d moment dhriti had son sdnt d legacy of d throne b returned to his blood line?sdnt duri b d legal n only automatic successor to d throne?evn if my pt is over ruled here then duri dnt gt d throne bt neither sd hv yudi as karna was d eldest son..what if kunti didnt remain a silent mute bt revealed all that karna ws d eldest n say karna inherited d throne then what?what if karna handed over d kingship to duri of his own will wd yudi still cd hv gt d throne?isnt their a possibility that arjun being married to subhodra gave an advantage to d pandavas as krishna bcums relative to arjun n 2 protect his sister's interest he being clever n hving foresightednes made better efficient war strategies ?plz cast aside d divine angle n think it as a battle of strategies n then u might b able to get what i mean to say..if kauravas were wiped out..pandavas won..cdnt they hv told historians to rewrite stories glorifying thr tales n struggles?we know when new ministers come they write down their own glorifying achievements so cdnt yudhisthir on bcuming d king ordered that d real records of kauravas b destroyed n manipulate a new story justifying their own actions alone..that they were d righteous one n d kauravas wrong doers?

ya d question may arise then y wd they glorify bheesma karna etc if they were rewriting fabricated facts..bt may b bcoz they had to show that they won against epic soldiers of d stature of karna bheesma drona so that they cd say look we defeated d gr8 warriors so they sang few praises for them too?also d fact that not one writer wrote down mahabharat bt there were many proves that they were building a myth nt recording down facts..

mahabharat fascinates me bcoz like a coin u can see 4m either side of d coin as head or tail..hw u c it is upto u to decide..whether u continue to bliv it like our elders bliv blindly or whether u question d conflicts n scrutinize d details n delve into d logic is upto d individual..all i bliv is a war against adharma cannot make u follow adharma too..then hw do u differentiate ?if kauravas were adharmis n they used tricks to win means krishna n pandavas wd follow d same?an eye 4 an eye policy?that itself is adharma..no evil can b won by equal plotting n cunningnes..i am nt convinced..i see thru mahabharat greedy weak ppl who tries to justify thr actions..tell me some thing if u dont bliv in god n dont pray bt u never sinned or wronged can god punish u?n what wd b ur crime?that u didnt bow down to god?bt arents gods above fury jealousy love lust etc?who is a god?one who dont show any human like qualitys of weakness...bt krishna showed partiality he gave gyan to all y didnt he just walk to kunti n give her d gyan to speak d truth b4 karnas death?y didnt he go n tell kunti to confess yudi ws d=nt d heir to d throne bt karna is n sd b if kauravas r 2 b denied then making karna king might hv solved d issue?duri loved karna..may b he wdnt hv resisted karna as much as he wd hv resisted yudi?so many innocent lives of common men cd hv been saved then..isnt it?also tell me y draupadi rejected karna ?can krishna if he was god advice draupadi to reject karna on basis of caste?can god indulge in casteism?all r equal for him isnt it?n arjun too kept talking of cast..bt duri is d only person who showed he didnt bliv in casteism by making karna a king of a small place..y?sum may say bcoz enemys enemy is frnd..bt even then duri showed he dnt bliv in caste system bt abilitys..much that i hate n condemn duri 4 VH bt still i respect him 4 showing that he honoured quality of a person above caste..

now u can pounce on me 😆..bt i hv no intentions to hurt any1 i just wish nt to gulp down a story handed down thru generations..i want to reanalyze n hunt tit bit facts n understand human reactions..this post is nt with intentions to maligh or hurt any1 bt to enlighten myself as a person..😊