Kunti - Like or Dislike - Page 3

I don't believe one's mistakes make one bad. How can we be so sure that Kunti did not repent her actions all her life? Aren't guilt and remorse the feelings that teach a person the lesson he/she needs to be taught? Kunti did do one mistake, she had her reasons and I'm not here to justify them. But one mistake of hers cannot define her as a person. One mistake of hers does not tarnish her character. She had virtues too. I think it is basic human nature to overlook a person's virtues and hold onto the mistakes they have committed and thus, an opinion about that person is formed. Negativity spreads like wildfire, and positivity takes time because it comes with a cause. I don't believe I can judge Kunti because she did one mistake.

Originally posted by: Crazypheonix008

Alright so maybe abandoning him was not a crime. I agree she was young and scared. Also she could not reveal his identity as her son even in the rang-bhoomi as that would have only increased his problems and also her 5 other sons would have been humiliated. BUT there was absolutely no need to reveal his identity when they were at the verge of a war. She did not do it out of her love towards Karna. She only did it to morally weaken him. After all he was the only one on the Kaurava side who was a big threat for Pandavas. That undoubtedly makes her selfish. She may have been a good mother to the pandavas but she was never a mother to Karna and she had no right to demand or even request anything from him.

Nah.. Kunti was not selfish.. She was doing it from desperation..she did not want brothers to fight.. But it was too late..and she did not reveal the truth because of same reason..she was scared.. And no dear..she did not do it to weaken him..no mother would do that..and weakening him it would do only good to him. So not a mistake.

Originally posted by: Brishti_Sarkar

Nah.. Kunti was not selfish.. She was doing it from desperation..she did not want brothers to fight.. But it was too late..and she did not reveal the truth because of same reason..she was scared.. And no dear..she did not do it to weaken him..no mother would do that..and weakening him it would do only good to him. So not a mistake.

@bunnylovessunny completely agree... 😊 Your justification is very good. Btw ur name? 😊

Originally posted by: Brishti_Sarkar

@bunnylovessunny completely agree... 😊 Your justification is very good. Btw ur name? 😊

Originally posted by: bunnylovessunny

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Nidhi :)</font>

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Yours?</font>

Brishti 😊

brishti please subtract one vote from "yes" option. because I voted it by mistake, if there is any way to change it tell me. I donot consider her bad, may b not complete lly white but definitely she was a gr8 mother in my eyes.she took those decisions which secured her children future. many may not like it but she thought practically, she always looked for bigger picture rather than putting her sentiments and emotions in a governing position to decide anything. she maynot have been right mother for karna but in my pov pandavas could have gotten no better mother than her. I donot think she lived for herself as many might think, she lived to make her sons strong.

Hello,

actually i dont know what to vote in this

she is a terrible mother to karna but a good mother to pandavas

can you also please keep another option in between neither very good nor very bad