New promo:Draupadi's marriage with 5 pandavas is adharam - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

73

Views

14.4k

Users

24

Likes

184

Frequent Posters

Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: spatel23

Maybe he was talking about having a relationship with more than one person ie. guy having multiple girlfriends at once and girls having multiple boyfriends at once?


He could be actually, about the 5 girlfriends, 6 boyfriends, ghar waali bahar waali, L.A. waali, bihar waali, delhi waali and village waali situation ๐Ÿ˜†

But isn't it really kind of situational, because for pandavas and draupadi, it was there dharma or as pointed out by some, even vyas and krishna call it their dharma but in today, see if someone marries 5 men and at that men who are siblings or a man who marries five sisters because of some dire situation they are forced in and get away with it by calling it their dharma.

And perhaps it was their dharma in that situation but the society wont accept it, moreover it will actually be called adharma by the society in today, anyways, it will be blown up all over the news channels and new papers, probably on the first page of times india, twitter trending topic and youth, religious fanatics ranting about it on ever social outlet. People can barely accept live-in couples in india, they tend to get all offended and uncomfortable about it.you cant even imagine a group in polyandrous or polygamous relationship( where the husbands are brothers or the wives are sisters) living next door to you or in the same colony or society and not make it the gossip of the ages, the group will be prone to slurs and bashing, moreover in some parts of india, they wont be even allowed to live in the area and it can end up in violence too.As for the interpretation of epic, it is actually interpreted differently not just in different times, but by different individuals too, the events, situations, the characters and their doings, all tend to be 'interpreted' differently, e.g. this forum.๐Ÿ˜†

Actually, i was going in the right direction with this, Ved vyas said that for the pandavas, they will be doing this for the establishment of dharma, but the same thing if done when not in the situation the pandavas are in, will be 'ghor paap" or something.
Say, men in those time had more than three wives or more, vichitravirya married two sisters, had to marry three sisters, do you think the society will accept it today or not condone it? the feminists will lose it for sure. Most women would love to have their husband beaten up by her "miekay waalas" for ever bringing a saut or already having a wife and making her the saut, let alone, have three sauts or be one of the many herself.



Edited by medha00 - 11 years ago
Intrepida thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: medha00

Agreed. you cant expect to watch mytho shows on indian television and learn it exactly how it is.


And you know, the excuse of Apaat Dharma that they are using can be used by anyone these days to get away with polyandry or polygamy, and so they should have stuck to the original story which is that Shivji gave her a boon; People are more god-fearing than the makers of the MB actually think they are!!! Because this is turning out to be a train wreck!!!!
surdr thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#43
this show on star plus is making Mahabharat a comedy cum mythological show ,some scenes are so hilarious...
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: Intrepida


And you know, the excuse of Apaat Dharma that they are using can be used by anyone these days to get away with polyandry or polygamy, and so they should have stuck to the original story which is that Shivji gave her a boon; People are more god-fearing than the makers of the MB actually think they are!!! Because this is turning out to be a train wreck!!!!

Bang on, man.
Perhaps they thought that then they will have to shoot a scene between Shiva and Draupadi in her previous life ... but the actor who plays shiva cant give the dates, he is quite busy so they though this s much easier.๐Ÿ˜†
Reminds me of flicks where character are smoking so they have to give warnings " tobacco/cig is harmful for you"
Perhaps they could have followed the text how it is and when draupadi is getting married to the pandavas, they can shot a warning note below: " polyandry is not practiced openly. be polyandrous at your own risk" or something like that.
Intrepida thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: medha00

Bang on, man.
Perhaps they thought that then they will have to shoot a scene between Shiva and Draupadi in her previous life ... but the actor who plays shiva cant give the dates, he is quite busy so they though this s much easier.๐Ÿ˜†
Reminds me of flicks where character are smoking so they have to give warnings " tobacco/cig is harmful for you"
Perhaps they could have followed the text how it is and when draupadi is getting married to the pandavas, they can shot a warning note below: " polyandry is not practiced openly. be polyandrous at your own risk" or something like that.

yea Mohit probably said Sati aa rahi hain, mei busy hu!! ๐Ÿ˜†
I mean I think people understand it if you put in the God factor
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#46
Yes, he would not leave sati just to help draupadi with her dilemma.
You know hoe youngsters today are becoming more 'spiritual' than 'religious'. the whole 'God is one, We are One, God is the higher Self" belief, i guess we tend to question the religious deities and their deeds a lot now.
Guess the makers thought that turning the whole uncomfortable thing into a social issue of today would be a better idea( they do that a lot) since we are more passionate about our society, apparently.๐Ÿ˜›
Novels on novels are released, trying to humanize the gods, trying to making more sense of bizarre things that are beyond our understanding and realm, giving it a more believable angle, giving it all a more practical logic since the mysticism of it all tends to make us queasy and uncomfortable in these times.
RosChel.Lobster thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#47
More than the cvs the tailor of SP ooopsie I mean the editor needs to b bashed coz his unnecessary cutting n editing ๐Ÿ˜† what is Star Plus upto? They release a promo that the marriage is adharm whilst on the other hand Shaheer is being asked to do live chat wid a #SanctityOfMarriage ๐Ÿ˜† is definition of sanctity changed? ๐Ÿ˜›
Intrepida thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#48

Originally posted by: medha00

Yes, he would not leave sati just to help draupadi with her dilemma.

You know hoe youngsters today are becoming more 'spiritual' than 'religious'. the whole 'God is one, We are One, God is the higher Self" belief, i guess we tend to question the religious deities and their deeds a lot now.
Guess the makers thought that turning the whole uncomfortable thing into a social issue of today would be a better idea( they do that a lot) since we are more passionate about our society, apparently.๐Ÿ˜›
Novels on novels are released, trying to humanize the gods, trying to making more sense of bizarre things that are beyond our understanding and realm, giving it a more believable angle, giving it all a more practical logic since the mysticism of it all tends to make us queasy and uncomfortable in these times.


lol, no he wouldnt, he is probably thinking Draupadi will figure it out sooner or later!

I also believe that there is one God (Hinduism is Monothesitic- believe in one God), but I believe that there many forms of God; I also believe that to be a different time and just because its not believable today doesnt mean it couldnt have happened then; its like how tv didnt exist 200 yrs ago, if you said such a thing exists or will exist then you were labeled mad!

I hate how people see our great epics as myths, because they are not, just because there are no videos from the actual mahabharat era doesnt mean it didnt happen, people say greeks existed but have a hard time believing that MB happened!! But the funny thing is that people who are non-hindu, non-indian refer to the Mahabharat as a history
Edited by Intrepida - 11 years ago
--Royal-- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: Rushika

More than the cvs the tailor of SP ooopsie I mean the editor needs to b bashed coz his unnecessary cutting n editing ๐Ÿ˜† what is Star Plus upto? They release a promo that the marriage is adharm whilst on the other hand Shaheer is being asked to do live chat wid a #SanctityOfMarriage ๐Ÿ˜† is definition of sanctity changed? ๐Ÿ˜›


Ha shaheer live chat how can i forget ๐Ÿ˜› Stupid SP only 1h phale batya tha ๐Ÿ˜ก maine ek bhi queation nhi pucha tha ๐Ÿ˜ญ
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: Rushika

More than the cvs the tailor of SP ooopsie I mean the editor needs to b bashed coz his unnecessary cutting n editing ๐Ÿ˜† what is Star Plus upto? They release a promo that the marriage is adharm whilst on the other hand Shaheer is being asked to do live chat wid a #SanctityOfMarriage ๐Ÿ˜† is definition of sanctity changed? ๐Ÿ˜›


๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".