Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-
hahaha, you should check out her twitter. Poor girl, got in so much trouble just for claiming some of the most lamest things on national TV 😆😆
I saw her twitter brawl after you mentioned about it. Hehe! She has lost it. But! one thing is clear, all along she wanted favors to be done to her in the show.
And surprisingly, she wanted VETO to be used on her. Does she even understand the meaning of Veto? VETO is used to save a person who is consistent in the show and whose elimination will be nothing but the loss of talent. Veto is used to save a contestant if Janta's votes fail to save the most deserving contestant in the show. Bharti needs to understand the technicalities and purpose of Veto. Period!
I have seen her claiming all over that Jhalak is a show for non-dancers. So, to be fair enough, if anything she should have raised her voice in the first place against the channel is, why are there real dancers as contestants to compete with non-dancers? If it is dancers vs. non-dancers then obviously, dancers will shine if and only if non-dancers don't show any growth. Past season Chang emerged to be a dancer from non-dancer and ultimately won the show. That's called growth and competition. Now, many say Sushant deserved to win last season, which is true, but Judges can't use VETO to alter that finale decision. But, they ofcourse can use VETO to save an eliminated contestant who deserves to be in finale. Thats the rule of every game.
Last but not the least, one line to Bharti, VETO should be used on right person at the right time. PEACE!!!😊