Vaikunta, the Palace of Lord Vishnu - Page 9

There are some weird movies out there that show Shri and Bhu fighting when Shri finds Balaji married to Padmavathi, and meanwhile Balaji turns into stone due to their fights, and Padmavathi immediately feels guilty and turns into stone herself, and feeling guilty that both of them had turned into stone, Shri tries to commit suicide and jumps into the river. 🤢 And then she gets reborn as Bibi Nanchari.

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

It also doesn't make sense to me, but then who was Chandrasena?

It doesn't make sense for her to be one of the bharya, because they too were ansh of Mahalakshmi.

Was she one of the 16,100?

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

There are some weird movies out there that show Shri and Bhu fighting when Shri finds Balaji married to Padmavathi, and meanwhile Balaji turns into stone due to their fights, and Padmavathi immediately feels guilty and turns into stone herself, and feeling guilty that both of them had turned into stone, Shri tries to commit suicide and jumps into the river. 🤢 And then she gets reborn as Bibi Nanchari.

I don't really believe in this story because of the sheer absurdity of it.

Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa

She was none of them. I don't think she was in love with Raghunandan.

The junior Queens were all anshs of MahaLakshmi, while the Bharya were various forms of MahaLakshmi. Rukmini and Bhama are worshipped beside Him for they are Shri and Bhu, and both contain the qualities of all the various forms.

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

There are some weird movies out there that show Shri and Bhu fighting when Shri finds Balaji married to Padmavathi, and meanwhile Balaji turns into stone due to their fights, and Padmavathi immediately feels guilty and turns into stone herself, and feeling guilty that both of them had turned into stone, Shri tries to commit suicide and jumps into the river. 🤢 And then she gets reborn as Bibi Nanchari.

I don't really believe in this story because of the sheer absurdity of it.

Some versions say that, some say that the Bharya were ansh of MahaLakshmi. But the saints, sages, men and women thing is what I have heard a lot too 😆

My family considers Alamelumanga Devi as purna Mahalakshmi (so Shri-Bhu combined) and Lord Venkateswara/Balaji as purna Maha Vishnu, so that's why I posted the story of Vedavathi which indicates that Padmavathi is Shri-Bhu both.

Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa

Some versions say that, some say that the Bharya were ansh of MahaLakshmi. But the saints, sages, men and women thing is what I have heard a lot too 😆

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

My family considers Alamelumanga Devi as purna Mahalakshmi (so Shri-Bhu combined) and Lord Venkateswara/Balaji as purna Maha Vishnu, so that's why I posted the story of Vedavathi which indicates that Padmavathi is Shri-Bhu both.

Actually, there's a version out there that my family believes. When Maha Lakshmi left Vaikunta in anger and went to do tapasya, Brahma and Shiva and all the devtas pleaded with her to cool down her anger, by showing her how lost Maha Vishnu was without her. And thus, Maha Lakshmi ended her tapasya and got reborn as Padmavathi, thus uniting with Maha Vishnu as Srinivas - Padmavathi.

In this story, there is no separate Shri-Bhu. It is just Mahalakshmi as Padmavathi and Maha Vishnu as Srinivas.

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

I read that this is the reason the 16,100 were considered separate from the ashtabharya, because although Krishna married them, they were not his divine consorts. Only the ashtabharya were his divine consorts, because they were Maha Lakshmi, while the 16,100 junior wives were the reincarnations of men and women from Ram avatar who wanted to experience the bliss of wedding the Lord.