Prashant: Should he accept that? - Page 13

Originally posted by: siddh_v

That too as in ambassador for tourism is totally BS. Comeon anybody can see that Nepal government is trying to take advantage of Bharat ki Shaan and that should be offensive for any and all Indians dosent matter whether they are from India or Nepal.

Originally posted by: ManaliS

hmmm i agree with whatever maya said! 😛

prashant is an Indian hence we won II...now why shud he become the brand ambassdor of Nepal.. hez a nepalese by origin but hez 100% Indian...

Originally posted by: SolidSnake

tht bold part...

i dun get one thing why are you bringing PAKISTAN between all this???pakistan has got NOTHING to do with it???

Originally posted by: dahotmail

Replies to all: Dev Anand was also brand ambassador of Nepal. Second one was Sunil Gavaskar. Now it is Prashant Tamang. so whats wrong. If an Indian can be Brand Ambassador of Nepal why not a Indian with Nepali origin be one?

Originally posted by: siddh_v

😆😆😆
Not an educated logic....

First of all, Indian idol is not a title awarded by Indian government, is it?

Prashant is an Indian citizen, not an ordinary indian citizen but a proud member of Indian police veteran, who lost their family member for India. It is Indian government's responsibility to look after Prashant's family. But, instead of having good life at the cost of the main member of his family, Prashant's family faced severe financial crisis. That is how Indian government supported Prashant. Prashant got a complementary job position when he turned 18, and whatever he got from Indian govt is the return of his service.

I now knew, Nepalese people also serve for UK's army, French Army, Brunei Army, US Army etc. But India is the least rewarding for their veterans. I feel sad for loss of prashant's father at his 10 years of life.

Originally posted by: siddh_v

She is in India and meeting with all these political leaders and her visit is being covered by the media and once she is gone who is going to talk about her in India???

Nepal is abusing the fact that Prashant Tamang is from Nepal and he is Indian Idol. Why did they have to wait for him to be crowned Indian Idol??? Why couldnt they make him grand ambassador anyways. win or loose he was the first Nepali to participate and reach top 5 in Indian Idol, No they had to wait for him to win. Why didnt they just declare him grand ambassador like Amit Paul. No they wanted to benefit from it.

Originally posted by: siddh_v

Ok agreed India has the bestest of best relation with Nepal but why should Indian Idol be a brand ambassador of tourism in Nepal??? Why should Nepal benefit from Indian Idol before the people of India do??? Dosent Prashant owe first to Indians than Nepalis????

Originally posted by: siddh_v

OK dont be technical with me you know what i mean.

Anyways its 4 in the morning here so i need to sleep. We can argue all our lifes and not come to an agreement but I still stand by my POV.

Prashant is an Indian by nationality, destination and employment. Prashant is an employee of Indian police fraternity. Prashant is,was and always be an Indian.

Prashant won Indian idol only because of people of India, Indian police fraternity and sony India. Prashant owes only to these people. So prashant should always work for the betterment of Indian government, Indian police and people of India. So he shouldnt accept this tittle as grand ambassador of tourism for Nepal because he is Bharat Ki Shaan not Nepal ki Shaan or if he decides to accept that tittle then he should step down as Indian Idol.

Originally posted by: chanaa

So far I understood, the title is an honorary title. I don't know what is his responsibility. I am sure, if it comes with a huge responsibility, as u claim, then the government won't dare to do that because the government can not have luxury to decide anything. They must have a set rules, procedures, and minimum qualifications.

I seriously hope that you are not as naive as you make out, have you ever known any government to do anything without expecting something in return - it may be an honorary title, but it is something that they can fully exploit for their own gain. 😉 call me a cynic if you must, I can never see any Government being transparent about their politics.