Prashant: Should he accept that? - Page 18

Created

Last reply

Replies

172

Views

8.3k

Users

25

Frequent Posters

SolidSnake thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

http://www.indianexpress.com/story/223749.html

Indian diaspora faces racism allegations

Press Trust Of India

Posted online: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 at 0000 hrs Print Email

durban, October 2: The overwhelming support of the Indian diaspora for Team India during the Twenty20 World Cup has triggered a raging debate on racism. The debate has been sparked by a local black journalist, Philani Magwaba, who in an article in the Sunday Tribune criticised the Indian community's support for the Indian team in the quarter finals against South Africa.

India knocked out South Africa and went on to beat Australia and Pakistan to win the inaugural championship.

Magwaba not only attacked the Indian community for failing to support the hosts but also questioned their patriotism when South Africa plays other countries in football. He also questioned the race relations between the Indian community and the African majority. Since the article was published, members of the Indian-origin community have responded by writing letters to the newspapers and telephoning radio stations to reject accusations of racism. Several people wrote to back to the newspaper that "Indians" were being singled out when they were merely exercising their democratic right to support any team of their choice. One writer, Logan Iyaloo, summed up the feelings of most people when he asked in his letter why should he be told who should he support when 14 years after democracy he was still classified as an "Indian". "I am a fifth generation South African, but only in South Africa am I referred to as an Indian," he wrote. He added: "During the struggle, people of colour referred to each other as black brothers and sisters. Now, out of convenience we are called 'Indians and coloureds'. By whose convenience are we still divided?" Another writer, Aslam Ismail, questioned the motive behind those attacking "Indians" for supporting India. "It is, indeed, a fact that we have not laid to rest much of our past conditioning and prejudices, but we are nation in transition and are optimistic that the following generations will successfully dispense with the baggage we carry," he wrote. A number of other letter writers stated that South Africa should start to select more "Indian origin" players and this might see a change of attitude. "Indians in South Africa had been playing cricket for more than 100 years and nobody could claim that "we cannot produce our own Chanderpauls and Monty Panesars," they said.

A local political analyst, Dr Kiru Naidoo, also entered the debate by writing a leader page article in the Sunday Tribune. Naidoo analysed that 'Indian-origin' people were only exercising their democratic right and people should not use this to promote racial animosity.

~~~~~~~~~

This story is pretty similar to how Nepalis (of Nepal) reacted when Prashant won...ofcourse they know that Prashant is an Indian but obviously they feel proud of his achievements.

orchid10 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: SolidSnake

http://www.indianexpress.com/story/223749.html

Indian diaspora faces racism allegations

Press Trust Of India

Posted online: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 at 0000 hrs Print Email

durban, October 2: The overwhelming support of the Indian diaspora for Team India during the Twenty20 World Cup has triggered a raging debate on racism. The debate has been sparked by a local black journalist, Philani Magwaba, who in an article in the Sunday Tribune criticised the Indian community's support for the Indian team in the quarter finals against South Africa.

India knocked out South Africa and went on to beat Australia and Pakistan to win the inaugural championship.

Magwaba not only attacked the Indian community for failing to support the hosts but also questioned their patriotism when South Africa plays other countries in football. He also questioned the race relations between the Indian community and the African majority.

Since the article was published, members of the Indian-origin community have responded by writing letters to the newspapers and telephoning radio stations to reject accusations of racism.

Several people wrote to back to the newspaper that "Indians" were being singled out when they were merely exercising their democratic right to support any team of their choice. One writer, Logan Iyaloo, summed up the feelings of most people when he asked in his letter why should he be told who should he support when 14 years after democracy he was still classified as an "Indian".

"I am a fifth generation South African, but only in South Africa am I referred to as an Indian," he wrote. He added: "During the struggle, people of colour referred to each other as black brothers and sisters. Now, out of convenience we are called 'Indians and coloureds'. By whose convenience are we still divided?"

Another writer, Aslam Ismail, questioned the motive behind those attacking "Indians" for supporting India. "It is, indeed, a fact that we have not laid to rest much of our past conditioning and prejudices, but we are nation in transition and are optimistic that the following generations will successfully dispense with the baggage we carry," he wrote.

A number of other letter writers stated that South Africa should start to select more "Indian origin" players and this might see a change of attitude. "Indians in South Africa had been playing cricket for more than 100 years and nobody could claim that "we cannot produce our own Chanderpauls and Monty Panesars," they said.

A local political analyst, Dr Kiru Naidoo, also entered the debate by writing a leader page article in the Sunday Tribune. Naidoo analysed that 'Indian-origin' people were only exercising their democratic right and people should not use this to promote racial animosity.

~~~~~~~~~

This story is pretty similar to how Nepalis (of Nepal) reacted when Prashant won...ofcourse they know that Prashant is an Indian but obviously they feel proud of his achievements.


Thanks for sharing this. It is the modern day reality, where people of different roots are spread all over the world, try to stay connected with their roots in little tiny ways. That does not and should not be used to question their loyalties towards the country of their nationality. It's not an unknown fact that most of the British Asian kids still support India or Pakistan etc when it comes to cricket. Are they all disloyal to the Britain? Ofcourse not.

When Michael Chang was still playing tennis, I remember most of the East Asians would root for him, even though he is an American. Even now, there were stories of Meiyang Chang's popularity in Singapore, all because of his Chinese roots. So I really can't make any head or tail of people calling Prashant and the people of Nepal all sorts of things just because they are happy at what this guy, who speaks the same language as them, looks like them and shares a common heritage has achieved and are trying to show an appreciation towards him by conferring an honorary title.
robaroo thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
To the posts above .... Personally I dont care but let ppl do it if it makes them happy , at least they are not doing any harm to the society

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".