Rahul Vaidya or Rahul Saexena - Page 12

Atleast u too know what i am trying to prove, but none of us seem to understand what are u guys trying to prove.Just a joke.
But there is one similarity we both are not experts in music to comment. i am just clarifying what someone started quoting Sonu told so and so to Rahul.S and Rahul.V respectively. I just wanted to correct that.bcuz they were giving all false quotations.
Otherwise no offences.

its just bcoz u dont want anybody Else to reply in this thread which could make the positiob of rahul Saxena doubtful as a Music God.
u only want rahul Saxena supporters to come here and let down rahul V.

and we all here are against it .They both are good in their own styles.
you ll only understand our posts if u lltry to and stop writing the samesonu comments again and again.

whatever we wrote all ofyou ll only come up in reply with rahul V is a sonu s copy and rahul S was supposed to be in top 3.

who can win with you when u can only think of the judges ?

that also shows that even u dont understand u got to reply bcoz its ur duty in favour of rahul saxena

Originally posted by: shefali_123

Dont be so mean to Rahul Vaidya guys. Rahul Saxena and Rahul Vaidya frankly cannot be compared at all because what one can sing the other cannot. They both have different voices and styles of singing.

Rahul Vaidya's voice is very soothing and with time he will get over his Sonu hangover too. His voice will get more depth as the years go by. He is just 18-19. A boy's voice does change till they are about 23-24. It gets deeper with time.

says who??

i can tell u first hand ... thts not true

Originally posted by: shimmeryf

gamezone when you just cant get the meaning of post then how could i ever get my message across you .
YOU have oly got one point what judges told to whom and on that basis you are ellaborating on everything.

to prove your point u first said sonu said this bcoz Rahul V is his copy.

if u qoute everything what judges told to rahul then plz try to remember the good things abt rahulV too.

if media is only sonu,farah and anu malik then why rahul is now more commercially successful and rahul S is not. 😊


ur understanding is so poor that when i said Sonu is
m ore succesful u hurriedly came up with a link of highest paid singer that shows how much u know of music.all ur supporter are only bringing on the qoutes of judges they dont have anything else to say .
😊

its not bcos rahul v is the better singer.. thts 4 sure.. rahul s was voted out earlier.. didn't get tht much publicity/media attention..

even qazi's album is out now.. does tht mean he's a btr singer thn rahul or arijit

we are talking of media here sid not who is best.nobody denies that rahul s is good but those who say rahul v is less thats is also not true bcoz they both have their styles.

Sid u need to read all the posts before replying .

Originally posted by: shimmeryf

we are talking of media here sid not who is best.nobody denies that rahul s is good but those who say rahul v is less thats is also not true bcoz they both have their styles.

Sid u need to read all the posts before replying .

and u need to read the post carefully b4 responding

i am talking about the media 2..

Originally posted by: sid_12354

and u need to read the post carefully b4 responding

i am talking about the media 2..

buddy you need to read the reviews on II finalists ,ratings etc.rahul is the most successful finalistamong all till to date.his album is doing the best, although he is not hte winner .He is voice of the month on fm ,also got some credit on B4U or MTV .btw rahul v is not as bad as qazi to be compared .

Originally posted by: shefali_123

Again I say Rahul Saxena is a very good singer no doubt but he has his own niche and so does Rahul Vaidya. They simply cannot sing the same songs and do justice to them. So you still cannot call Rahul Saxena as the best singer of II and fg lot. He is very good but so are all others barring a few in thier own niches.

RV is one of the most inconsistant contestants in II! his suraj hua maddham, chaiyan chaiyan, tumse milke dil ka hal (MHN)... was pretty bad! Rahul S's only one song not up to the mark... but it wasnt tht bad!!!

if u r talking abt own Niche then RS i agree he has his own niche.... but RV certainly doesnt have one!!! he is in lower level of Sonu's niche..... 😉

Originally posted by: shefali_123

Dont be so mean to Rahul Vaidya guys. Rahul Saxena and Rahul Vaidya frankly cannot be compared at all because what one can sing the other cannot. They both have different voices and styles of singing.

Rahul Vaidya's voice is very soothing and with time he will get over his Sonu hangover too. His voice will get more depth as the years go by. He is just 18-19. A boy's voice does change till they are about 23-24. It gets deeper with time.

yeah if u rite then RV should have come Indian Idol 2008.....😆

Originally posted by: shimmeryf

buddy you need to read the reviews on II finalists ,ratings etc.rahul is the most successful finalistamong all till to date.his album is doing the best, although he is not hte winner .He is voice of the month on fm ,also got some credit on B4U or MTV .btw rahul v is not as bad as qazi to be compared .

no hes not the most successful.. abhijeet is.. look at the album sales/no of shows they do/money per show/songs for films tht they hv sung... i can give u specifics if u want

btw i never called vaidya a bad singer or compared him to qazi... like i said earlier u need to read my post carefully...

i just commented on the medias role in the popularity of a singer.. nothing more nothing less.