Rahul Vaidya or Rahul Saexena - Page 15

Originally posted by: shefali_123

Yes Amisha I will still say Rahul Vaidya and Arijit Singh cannot be compared because they are both different with different voices and styles. Though I love Arijit more than Rahul but I will still say that Arijit cannot sing some of the songs what Rahul can with elan.

Well acc to Arijit Rahul S was the best singer among those ten. Maybe if Amit Sana or Rahul Vaidya would have been there he might have said that they are the best. You never know.Even Rahul was considering Arijit as his only competition. In fact he had said this twice.

I liked Rahul V suraj hua madhyam and tumse milke yes his sur went here and there but Sonu Nigam tolfd him if you dance and sing the way Rahul was doing even I will go out of sur. Very few people can control thier sur and breath while dancing and singing at the same time. It is very very difficult.

We all know that Sonu when he first came into the music scene was compared to Mohd Rafi and was called a poor copy. But with time and experience he gained his own individuality. I am saying the same thing for Rahul V. He is just 18. He has a long way to go. With time he will develop his own style that is all I am saying.

And yes today Qazi is more successful and popular than any of these contestants put together. He was always a good performer but he does not sing bad now and has his own style and voice. He sings from the heart.And yes for his fans he is the best singer.They will put all arguments forward to prove it. 😊

shefali he wasnt dancing or performing tht much when he sang tujhse milke dil ka haal...

it was a difficult song thts why he cudn't sing it well ... he sang some of th e parts well.. he coudnt do justice to the part where he had to sing in a high pitched voice like a qawal

sonu didnt tell him anything like tht.. anu told him tht this is a very difficult song and tht they had auditioned several singers who cudnt get it right b4 they asked sonu to sing it.. sonu pretty much said the same thing

I have no more comments to make here. 😊

But I brought Arijit into the topic only because Amisha asked me that if it was a poll btn Arijit and Rahul V will you still say the same thing. I only replied to her post. She also asked me that Arijit admitted that Rahul Saxena was the best singer. What will you say to that?? So I only replied to her thats all.

Amisha said if you compare Rahul V to Qazi and Sana in terms of performances then also he lags behind. She asked me will you say Qazi is better than them. I only replied saying yes for his fans he is the best.

And yes Qazi was a threat to all fg contestants not only to Arijit because he had something which they did not have. It is as simple as that. 😊 😃

Originally posted by: shimmeryf

arey bhai the winners contract is different from the ones the runner ups have . do u agree?

u dont see the faces of runners up like u do see the winners all the time.
the channels like B4UMTV,radio channels dont show runner up unnecessarly until they get good ratings.

Oh! so u had experienced all kinds of contracts which Indian idol contestants have as u can easily compare the contracts..😳😳

Now tell me Amit Sana was first runner-up and Rahul V was 2nd..Then why was Rahul V given the original album and not Amit Sana??

I will tell u why.. all the commercial success and the contracts only depends upon the face value and nothing else....This doesnt make anyone gud or bad singer.. Gud singer is the one who has depth in voice, Great range, Versatality, Right emotions, and a UNIQUE STYLE.

Now tell me does RAHUL V has all th qualities for making really gud singer???? And also tell me 'is Rahul Vaidya better singer than Pandit Jasraj, as he is COMMERCIALLY more successful than him'???

RAHUL SAXENA IS THE BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST SINGER.
Abt Rahul vaidyaa i have no words....GIRLS GIRLS GIRLS
please give us a break...I know all are in love with RV for his looks.
Lets leave this decision on god.
What i can say mann....In India people&/girls appreciate looks more than anything ...thats why rahul vaidyaa can be adored,
qazi can win without voice and Rahul saxena lives in oblivion...Sorry to say but True guys this can happen only in India.....

But never say die rahul saxena... there are still people like us who adore true talent and charisma.....

---------------------------------------
I HATE GIRLS
Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder

Originally posted by: gamezone

Oh! so u had experienced all kinds of contracts which Indian idol contestants have as u can easily compare the contracts..😳😳

Now tell me Amit Sana was first runner-up and Rahul V was 2nd..Then why was Rahul V given the original album and not Amit Sana??

I will tell u why..all the commercial success and the contracts only depends upon the face value and nothing else....This doesnt make anyone gud or bad singer.. Gud singer is the one who has depth in voice, Great range, Versatality, Right emotions, and a UNIQUE STYLE.

Now tell me does RAHUL V has all th qualities for making really gud singer???? And also tell me 'is Rahul Vaidya better singer than Pandit Jasraj, as he is COMMERCIALLY more successful than him'???

gamezone this is onlyfor you as i dont want to start it all over again and only that i want to make my point clear for U otherwise you can continue with your rahul saxena is best i wont interrupt.

where did i say being commerically successful decides the best in singing ?go and check my posts ..if somebody is being commecercially successful then he/she is .if u claim to know the qualities of a good singer then u ust be knowing that every singer has a style and on that basis you can not just say that the other singer has nothing good ,he is just been pushed by media .
if you find weaknesses in one singer i can find weaknesses in your best singer too.to put your point across all supporters are only bringing facts that can be countered with equal weightages but i m not interested.

Come on guys RAHUL VAIDYA of course!!!