P on a roll - Page 11

Originally posted by: Rosyme

P is so stupid. Her parents are her sachha rishta. She's holding on to Sai s son and claiming to be sachha rishta.

She never cared for Samrat also.

If someone else was n her place , they will leave the CN hell and run to their parents n London.

Will be so good.

Vinu should get suffocated with P and run away one day.

Even after Vinu opting to stay with P, he will surely be drawn towards his sister for sure.

A child can't stick to the mother always. They need company of kids of their age also.

Esp boys they go out and play. They need friends and siblings.

In one of the episode sai said same thing to P, when she asks v to be her nominee. Actually she never cares about her parents.

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

Leave pakhi, virat thinks she is alone and need vinu to live.

He knows pakhi has her loving parents, his whole family who blindly supports her.

He knows sai has no one in the world except savi. She is dying daily with guilt for vinu death. Still he wants her to give up her son.

According to virat

Pre leap pakhi has no husband so she should get vinu

Post leap pakhi can't conceive so she should get vinu.

In initial episodes there was a scene where pakhi wanted virat to be her nominee. Virat didn't deny it strongly. But sai said why she is putting virat above her own parents. Virat can never think about this point. Because attention from pakhi gives him boost. This is one of the main reasons why he always ties up pakhi to him.

He felt happy knowing pakhi knows many things about him during some game before her accident.

He thought she would put his birth of date as her password.

So he is noticing her attention on him and secretly enjoys it.

This kind of man is dangerous to girls in real life.

He's also a psycho so woh Pakhi psycho hi usko suit karti hai

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Patralekha's ek sachcha rishta

This just looks ..........creepy

Not at all mother son

I'm disgusted glad I didn't watch the scene

Originally posted by: Mikis

This just looks ..........creepy

Not at all mother son

I'm disgusted glad I didn't watch the scene

Yes it is creepy

Originally posted by: Mikis

This just looks ..........creepy

Not at all mother son

I'm disgusted glad I didn't watch the scene

Yaar I actually made a short story that involves creepy Pakhi as a predator with nice pics but then yaha pe I didn't feel like posting because there is no room for dark humour here 🤣

The problem is not the character but Aishwarya's body language.

Post on the other side!

We'll enjoy it lol 😆

Yea its definitely the actress, I've seen overly obsessive mother characters...its scary but theres still that motherly touch...

here shes almost overpowering him and im sorry but her smile her GENUINE smile creeps the hell out of me 😳

and I think shes not able to distinguish her obsessive behaviour towards V and Vinu

if you go back and see her reaction when in KK she arrived after V was shot her weirdly smoothing his hair and kissing him....shes the same with Vinu ...theres no difference

so it comes across creepy you are treating your "Love" obsession the same as your "child" obsession 🤢

Yes exactly in Kankavli also she behaved the same way....

Eeks...

Just read Kishori's interview on Tellychakkar. She gave a safe answer on who does Vinu belong to? She said he belongs to all the three. HOW?

Unless they show Pakhi is changed, how can we believe in her love for Vinayak?

Let us say she changed after jail visit which I believed too. A changed Pakhi will not agree to marry Virat. Ok she helped him in adoption by marrying him. She would have divorced him immediately. OK she remained in the marriage for family's sake, she should have adhered to the conditions. Be Vinu's mother ONLY. Not expect anything from Virat. Independent of whether Virat's feelings are changed for her or not, she as a changed person who wronged the man and his family should not stay in the marriage, just to show that her intentions are genuine. She has not done that. It almost appears that she loved Vinu to get into good books of Virat. We have seen how Vinu did not bond with her at all till his Aai told him the importance of his adopted parents. Then how does Vinu belong to her?

Now, coming to the main issue of surrogacy. She had him in her womb to get close to Virat. Showed hell to his real mother. Played with the pregnancy till the last minute. Then how can he claim Vinu? On moral grounds. She endangered Vinu from the beginning. In that way, she was not even a good incubator for Vinu. It is his parents' struggle that he was delivered and alive today. He belonged to his biological parents then and now as well.

She might have raised Vinu not knowing that he is the real one. But what are her intentions behind raising him. Is it a true relationship as she claims or is it a forged bond to get into the good books of Virat? Till that is resolved, even the Vinu she raised doesnt morally belong to her. He belongs to only Virat.

So please stop spreading this misconception that Vinu belongs to Pakhi, till that lady owns up her mistakes and feels sorry for what she did to Sai.

Vinu belonged to Sai then and now. The mother in her struggled to keep him alive and healthy then, and now. And the same mother might sacrifice him for his own happiness now. Not cage him to just have him for herself. Please dont compare Sai with Pakhi as mothers. They are poles apart. I hope Vankar doenst mess this up with his Devki and Yashoda theory. Both Devki and Yashoda are Sai.

Yes just posted the same thing. Horrible interview.

How can senior ppl spread this news about surrogacy. Esp the last question she answered as herself.

So stupid and insensitive interview.