P on a roll - Page 12

Not as Bhavani, but as Kishori, who do you think Vinayak actually belongs to?

Vinayak actually belongs to all three of them, Virat, Sai and Pakhi. Pakhi Played the surrogate mother. Sai is the real biological mother and Virat is the father.

No. The surrogate has no right to the child. None. Ille. Nada. Nahi.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Not as Bhavani, but as Kishori, who do you think Vinayak actually belongs to?

Vinayak actually belongs to all three of them, Virat, Sai and Pakhi. Pakhi Played the surrogate mother. Sai is the real biological mother and Virat is the father.

No. The surrogate has no right to the child. None. Ille. Nada. Nahi.

Onscreen ok. But offscreen too making such statements. Highly irresponsible and provocative.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Not as Bhavani, but as Kishori, who do you think Vinayak actually belongs to?

Vinayak actually belongs to all three of them, Virat, Sai and Pakhi. Pakhi Played the surrogate mother. Sai is the real biological mother and Virat is the father.

No. The surrogate has no right to the child. None. Ille. Nada. Nahi.

Can’t they be careful while saying or quoting these things. How about mentioning as adoptive mother not the surrogate. Wasn’t that the reason they changed the narative and brought adoption in the picture.

A surrogate is a surrogate not a mother not even a surrogate mother.

Uss hisab se, if people take a bank locker to keep their valuables the bank should claim all the valuables as the locker is theirs. Kya logic hain ye.

Looks like all r scared of some ppl. Always supporting a few.

You answered your own question in the beginning I mentioned this in another post...this is just to calm down fans - whatever they showed recently was obviously very triggering especially V's dialogues so now of course IVs will come out to put a "positive spin" on things and actors will give their "personal" opinions which not surprisingly matches what the shows narrative is lol

Another thing I think audience will have to accept is that P will be considered vinus mumma that will never change....shes never going to change from mumma and downgrade to Aunty - so going forward the story will be that Vinu has 2 maas and it will have to be accepted....

If they are basing it that she gave birth to Vinu then thats definitely incorrect but basing it that after adoption he accepted her as mumma and raised him ( no matter what her intentions were he doesnt know that) then they will still continue that P is mumma - As a audience we may not believe it but narrative wise they showed P fasting for Vinu going bare foot ....doing over and above for him, going as far as bringing sai into their lives to cure him - through the story or shows narrative she did this all for VINU, for audience we saw she did it to get close to V - what the story was trying to show didn't get accepted by fans but they are still continuing with it ...

If I can play devils advocate again for p for a bit in regards to V- based on what they are trying to show not what audience sees

P was genuinely changed she accepted the deal marriage initially for Vs happiness and at first she was fine with it - they showed even she was uncomfortable with trip talks etc...basically she buried her obsession but it wasn't gone! but the family kept telling her its her right to move on with him...she has to push him blah blah...and V then gave her slight hopes with taking "friendly " trip etc so her obsession started to creep in then in KK V gets shot and her TRUE feelings come out where we see her obsessive behavior of kissing him and all that...and from there V started feeding this same obsession (unknowingly as he thought she changed) and she starts to get hope he gives her assurances and her obsession comes back fully and now we have this result lol

but going back to your original post

this was planned from the start which is why P was never Aai the 2 mummas was destined...I knew it when Sai herself after Vinus birth gave the 2 mummas dialogue...

so basically the actors are going to give an opinion that coincides with the narrative of the show

not surprising at all

I am trashing Kishori ka interview just like the makers trashed Patralekha’s kok

I hope they know the rules. Atleast could have been correct in interviews.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Not as Bhavani, but as Kishori, who do you think Vinayak actually belongs to?

Vinayak actually belongs to all three of them, Virat, Sai and Pakhi. Pakhi Played the surrogate mother. Sai is the real biological mother and Virat is the father.

No. The surrogate has no right to the child. None. Ille. Nada. Nahi.

Oh man do these people even understand the meaning of surrogacy?! I'm sure they're all eduacted people I don't wanna doubt their intelligence and common sense but they really compel me to do it. If their logic is applied in real life scenarios, then people like Priyanka Chopra and Mrs Khan have to share their kid with their respective surrogates because those people carried the kids in their wombs! Come on now

If I were a genuine Pakhi who loved this Vinu, I would approach court as legal adoptive mother and divorce Virat. He was never hers and now also his heart lies somewhere. So atleast i will fight for one true relationship, get partial custody and move on with life. Not suck life out of everyone.

What are her intentions? Does he want Virat or Vinu or both? Because it looks like Virat is not going to be hers. Jadugarni has already took him into her vash right?

See the intentions are not right. She is getting Vinu to herself because SHE cannot live. Not because she loves Vinu. There is lot of difference.

Sai loves Vinu so she will let him go! But will Pakhi do that? NEVER. For her, she comes first.