Why pakhi positivity is not accepted? - Page 4

What is screened at prime time could be a soap with substance rather than the triangle story where tracks are rinse repeat .

Pluto maybe an offender but VC is no less. A law enforcer who himself is blameworthy of crimes, bigamy, domestic violence, cheating, fraud by aiding and abetting his Kaku and Pluto became an accomplice too

Anyone aiding and abetting criminal activities is also an offender more so when he is a DCP.

Originally posted by: ShipIsSailing

The audience will be okay as long as the story moves forward. Period.

Sai may be an audience favourite, but for most tv watchers this is just a form of getting entertainment and drama. Even if they kill off Sai or send her somewhere and make the story all about Virakhi, the audience will still watch it if they bring in some good drama.

This show is getting trp not because of any particular character, but rather because of the drama that the Sai-Virat-Pakhi angle is bringing. Everyone loves a good old teesri-aurat storyline. Ab vo inhe Pakhi se mile ya Sai se, it doesn't matter.

The Majority Indian audience doesn't take this as seriously or gravely as we do.

It's misconception that trp audience watch this show for a single character or ship, if that's the case they wouldn't have got trp for the weeks where most of the episodes are about virat pakhi intimate moments and their relationship conflicts.

Agree with your take. I think Virat is an asshole who ruined both the women's lives. I think it's the internalized misogyny why people criminalise pakhi while it's Virat who failed to maintain boundaries when he was with Sai. P was the third person she did what V allowed her to do.

Originally posted by: Mnr05

Agree with your take. I think Virat is an asshole who ruined both the women's lives. I think it's the internalized misogyny why people criminalise pakhi while it's Virat who failed to maintain boundaries when he was with Sai. P was the third person she did what V allowed her to do.

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

I honestly want to know the answer to it.

When people can accept virat crimes, then why can't they accept pakhi crimes?

If Virat's actions like starving sai, ousting her at midnight, manhandling her, locking her in the room, calling her an orphan, snatching her kid, and putting her in jail can be forgotten, then why can't pakhi's crimes be forgotten?

If virat beating an innocent man is jealous, why is pakhi harming sai seen as an evil act?

Pakhi trying to harm sai is unforgivable physically. But virat planning to make sai suffer in jail is forgivable?

Post leap pakhi treated sai better than virat & his family.

Still, she is not positive, but Virat is ml?

Suppose Virat's all crimes are accepted just because he is ml. Then why can't the same for pakhi, who is fl (Both channels & makers made it obvious many times)? If she isn't fl, she won't get sad songs for her.

Pakhi showing irritation towards savi is vamp signs

But virat getting attracted by the woman who said she hates his kid is what signs? Ml signs?

I honestly don't care whether pakhi is positive, negative, or anything.

I want to know how one character is getting justified for all his crimes while another character gets bashed for the same type of actions.

In the end, ml, fl status matters, not the character's actions. A character can do whatever he wants if he has ml status👌🏽.

I completely agree with you. Wrong is always wrong, regardless of whoever does it.

I can't support Sairat without Virat's redemption. However, I also don't support Virakhi or Vilekha, as Pakhi got Virat out of her obsession.

Virat's ill-treatment of Sai, like manhandling, turning her out of the house at midnight without her belongings, locking her in the room, snatching the child from her, and putting her behind bars on false allegations, cannot be justified in any way.

However, Pakhi's planning and plotting against Sai and an attempt to harm her cannot be justified.

I see that Virakhi's marriage is platonic. Virat only respects Pakhi, supports her, and trusts her, but did not give her the rights of a wife till now.

I get you, understand what u r trying to say..

But most of the times for the fans , for the show makers it's easy to put the blame of everything on the third person, the other woman in this case, mostly bcz the jodi is shipped.

Originally posted by: asmi_ekaa

I get you, understand what u r trying to say..

But most of the times for the fans , for the show makers it's easy to put the blame of everything on the third person, the other woman in this case, mostly bcz the jodi is shipped.

Sairat is already a shipped couple. But ghkpm makers are dragging it.

People are not accepting Pakhi's positivity as they feel that it is too good to be true.

Pakhi already began to hate Savi and wants her to go out of Virat's life as she feels that Virat is neglecting Vinu and her.

Originally posted by: kavitha_r

I completely agree with you. Wrong is always wrong, regardless of whoever does it.

I can't support Sairat without Virat's redemption. However, I also don't support Virakhi or Vilekha, as Pakhi got Virat out of her obsession.

Virat's ill-treatment of Sai, like manhandling, turning her out of the house at midnight without her belongings, locking her in the room, snatching the child from her, and putting her behind bars on false allegations, cannot be justified in any way.

However, Pakhi's planning and plotting against Sai and an attempt to harm her cannot be justified.

I see that Virakhi's marriage is platonic. Virat only respects Pakhi, supports her, and trusts her, but did not give her the rights of a wife till now.

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

@bold how it is platonic when he is giving her mesmerized looks, feeding her, allowing her to button his shirt like a typical wife do. Only bedding her means giving her wife rights? Claiming her as wife in society, doing anniversary celebrations with her, letting her come to his personal space, initiating advances towards her, now ready to share same bed with her. Won't these not come under wife rights?

Sadly even after what all u have mentioned ,ITV mei sex is the only relationship that can denote a relationship between husband and wife.

Usse pehle audience see it as Virat doing his zimmedaari .

However how we see it, they do have a better wife husband relationship than Sai Virat ever had, barring the sex

Originally posted by: asmi_ekaa

Sadly even after what all u have mentioned ,ITV mei sex is the only relationship that can denote a relationship between husband and wife.

Usse pehle audience see it as Virat doing his zimmedaari .

However how we see it, they do have a better wife husband relationship than Sai Virat ever had, barring the sex

Had they got married without sai, samrat in picture, they would have lead happy & peaceful married life.