Why pakhi positivity is not accepted?

I honestly want to know the answer for it.

When people can accept virat crimes then why can't they accept pakhi crimes.

If virat's actions like starving sai, ousting her at midnight, manhandling her, locking her in room, calling her orphan, snatching her kid, putting her in jail can be forgotten then why can't pakhi crimes be forgetten?

If virat beating an innocent man is seen as jealousy then why pakhi harming sai is seen as evil act.

Pakhi trying to physically harm sai is unforgivable. But virat planning to make sai suffer in jail is forgivable?

Post leap pakhi treated sai better than virat & his family.

Still she is not positive but Virat is ml?

If virat's all crimes are accepted just because he is ml. Then why can't the same for pakhi who is fl (Both channel & makers made it obvious many times). If she isn't fl, she won't get sad songs for her.

Pakhi showing irritation towards savi is vamp signs

But virat getting attracted by the woman who said she hates his kid is what signs? Ml signs?

I honestly don't care whether pakhi is positive, negative or anything.

Just wanna know how one character is getting justified for all his crimes while other character gets bashed for same type of actions.

At the end ml, fl status is all matters not the character actions?. A character can do whatever he wants as long as he has ml status👌🏽.

I honestly want to know the answer for it.

When people can accept virat crimes then why can't they accept pakhi crimes.

If virat's actions like starving sai, ousting her at midnight, manhandling her, locking her in room, calling her orphan, snatching her kid, putting her in jail can be forgotten then why can't pakhi crimes be forgetten?

If virat beating an innocent man is seen as jealousy then why pakhi harming sai is seen as evil act.

Pakhi trying to physically harm sai is unforgivable. But virat planning to make sai suffer in jail is forgivable?

Post leap pakhi treated sai better than virat & his family.

Still she is not positive but Virat is ml?

If virat's all crimes are accepted just because he is ml. Then why can't the same for pakhi who is fl (Both channel & makers made it obvious many times). If she isn't fl, she won't get sad songs for her.

Pakhi showing irritation towards savi is vamp signs

But virat getting attracted by the woman who said she hates his kid is what signs? Ml signs?

I honestly don't care whether pakhi is positive, negative or anything.

Just wanna know how one character is getting justified for all his crimes while other character gets bashed for same type of actions.

At the end ml, fl status is all matters not the character actions?. A character can do whatever he wants as long as he has ml status👌🏽.

Pakhi is negative and selfish from day 1. She’s just behaving in a diplomatic way, her sugar coated words are always venomous. Also I’ve never appreciated Viraat ill treating Sai.
]

Well u can see many of them accusing birat’s Character also and not even ready to accept Sairat again

Well there r Virat’s stans they r glorifying his deeds of abusing sai as his love for her😡😡😡😡

Papi’s positivity will never be accepted by d audience. And one more thing without redemption and regret why all d family r calling her mahaan as she is a saint. And this is completely unacceptable to me and even d audience

I dont think people are justifying V when they are calling out P. Both are equally hated by many people. But P is currently getting hailed as a mahaan, bechaari and thats why shes getting more attention. Only the people who want "Sairat" despite the toxicity find ways to justify V.

Originally posted by: Colors2012

When you think pakhi is negative for her sugar coated words then how virat is ml who manipulates everyone, beats an innocent guy, ousts two woman at midnight, send a woman to jail on false charges, snatches a kid from a mother, gets smitten by the woman who admitted her hate for his kid😊? Are these ml actions 🤔. Didn't virat use sugar coated words to get his work done? How he is different from pakhi?

One difference between Virat and Pakhi is that both have done wrong but Virat has not done anything intentionally wrong to harm anyone but pakhi had intentionally done wrong with Sai to gain Virat

Originally posted by: Nja91

I dont think people are justifying V when they are calling out P. Both are equally hated by many people. But P is currently getting hailed as a mahaan, bechaari and thats why shes getting more attention. Only the people who want "Sairat" despite the toxicity find ways to justify V.

When virat is still shipped with sai without even any redemption, that itself means giving clean chit to him.

Personally I don't have problem with sairat shipping. But it's surprising for me to see justifications for virat's actions when the same consideration can't be given to pakhi.

I totally agree with u in this

Virat’s stans and d remaining sairat shippers r justifying his crimes/sins or whatever crap he did to hurt humiliate sai

Virat and pakhi both r equally at fault

Infact since miscarriage scenes I wrote d same thing both virat and papi r toxic and both destroyed a woman’s life her happiness

Originally posted by: Sayanti94

One difference between Virat and Pakhi is that both have done wrong but Virat has not done anything intentionally wrong to harm anyone but pakhi had intentionally done wrong with Sai to gain Virat

Making a person get starved is not intentionally wrong?

Locking a person in room (which is domestic violence) is not intentionally wrong?

Bailing a criminal is not intentionally wrong?

Did anyone hypnotised virat to do the above actions?

Pakhi tried to harm sai physically to seperate her from virat.

Virat wanted to make sai suffer in jail by putting false charges on her to seperate her from her daughter.

How both are any different when both did those actions with an intention to harm sai?

i have a problem with Sairat Shipping itself because to me that opinion is essentially an endorsement of male chauvinism, toxicity being acceptable and everything problematic about our society - that men get a free pass no matter what. As things stand with the show, the only way to be a Sairat shipper is to villanise P but justify V. That I cannot do. To me, both are pathetic.

Comparing his reactions to both women shows me that-

1. He is selfish. He can't love ANYONE except himself not even his own kids, parents, siblings etc.

2. He has a soft corner for P and that hasn't changed when he was married to Sai and continues now when he's married to P too. She gets away with spewing hate on his child Savi also. He cant "love" her but she's got way more respect and consideration than she deserves from V and Chavans.