GHKPM daily episode discussion thread #78 - Page 89

Originally posted by: kuchnaakahoo

But it was useless. Since Virat did not reflect on it still. This character is uni dimensional. As if he works on only one emotion at a time. If he is angry, he wouldnt look past anything, not even his own actions. Bas he will keep raging like a mad bull. People are rejoicing about Patralekha 's downfall. But to be honest , this character is more reasonable than Virat.

Patralekha fir bhi samjh main aati hai.

But Virat is a tone deaf character. Honestly Sairat is done for good.

Ek episode mein toh sab nehi dikhayenge. He's currently in same zone he was in post Shruti phase or later part before he cooled down.

His character has always been like that post anniversary was the biggest example.

Originally posted by: mysticriver

Ek episode mein toh sab nehi dikhayenge. He's currently in same zone he was in post Shruti phase or later part before he cooled down.

His character has always been like that post anniversary was the biggest example.

Yeah he was super mad for hiding his daughter. Anyone would be. He will cool down. He listened to sais advice. 🫤

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

That's why I always say we should criticise their toxic writing instead of justifying it or finding excuses for it, if they think audience doesn't buy their whitewashing techniques, they have to show what audience want atleast to some extent. They do stalk twitter and forums so constant constructive feedback is important.

Constructive feedback is necessary. But in terms of storyline and characters. The moment in your feedback, if people add words like jackass, nalla, doormat, the "construction" stops there. Vanku himself has admitted that viewers have sometimes pointed out their mistakes and they try to recify it.

Constructive feedback without vile comments are always appreciated anywhere

The episode was good but no one mentioned Usha maushi and how she flipped on damad jee 😂😂

Originally posted by: kashiffai1970

The episode was good but no one mentioned Usha maushi and how she flipped on damad jee 😂😂

I was coming to that Usha Maushism of the day. How can I miss the humour angle of the episode 🤣

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Constructive feedback is necessary. But in terms of storyline and characters. The moment in your feedback, if people add words like jackass, nalla, doormat, the "construction" stops there. Vanku himself has admitted that viewers have sometimes pointed out their mistakes and they try to recify it.

Constructive feedback without vile comments are always appreciated anywhere

I don't believe anything works nutty. I have given many feedbacks to Vankar - mine are always on characters & storyline - written in decent language.

Ultimately, they do what they want to. Vankar said he doesn't change anything significantly due to fans & that's the hard truth.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Constructive feedback is necessary. But in terms of storyline and characters. The moment in your feedback, if people add words like jackass, nalla, doormat, the "construction" stops there. Vanku himself has admitted that viewers have sometimes pointed out their mistakes and they try to recify it.

Constructive feedback without vile comments are always appreciated anywhere

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Santra kaka should claim Patralekha and his business back. Even Mohit can stick to the character of going against Omi.

Yes this s the right time for Omi to take his business back as P s attention s diverted towards V s actions.

I don't believe Vankar and any of the core group members stalk the forum. It is an urban myth. I don't think they have that kind of time or that kind of inclination

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

Personally don't think any problem with those words because that's how they show their characters. Even pakhi character got called many names. As long as it is characters not real people, don't think it is problem.

They don't want to show their character as doormat or nalla or let's say names for Pakhi. That's not their intention. It is us the audience who have termed it as is. If any criticism, even in real life is filled with hatred, no individual takes it as "constructive criticism." It is natural.

For example: Tum gaali deke bol rahe ho ki main kuch achcha bata raha hu, why will they take cognisance? For them or anyone, gaali dene wala is a troll.

P.S: Tum matlab... an example haa. Not tum tum per say