Sonarika Bhadhoria as Parvati-Discuss Here ONLY - Page 18

Created

Last reply

Replies

452

Views

52.3k

Users

82

Likes

841

Frequent Posters

246851 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
they have posted sonarika's picture as parvati in the life ok facebook page, i think that is sort of official confirmation
617251 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
Hi!

I just have a few questions that I really would love an answer to 😊



1) Why was mata sati "ayogya" (sorry if I misspelled that) for Shivji?

2) Why did mata sati not remember/know of her being Adi-Shakti, while Parvati maa did? (why was Parvati "yogya" for shivji)

3) What was the purpose of Shiv-Sati's marriage/ Sati's birth?

4) How could/ did Sati become "yogya" for Shiv?/ How would she realize her powers?

5) Why does Shiv marry Sati even though she is not" yogya?"


Thanks in advance!
NandiniRaizadaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: shruti.nil

ha ha-when i read that topic i found it so funny that i will 100% sure im going to say something very mean and nasty-thats why no comments over there..like seriously?...that is THE most ridiculous theory ive ever heard!Just because you like a certain jodi does that mean you change a matter of fact to accommodate it!...Mahadev and Parvati are the most Ideal couple in Hindu Culture,and just because Mouni roy isnt playing Parvati you say he doesnt love parvati at all...im very amused!PS-wonder what the asli Mahadev would have said if he ever read this! or infact what would Devi Maa think...


lol even i felt like writing something mean but didnt as i didnt want to get a warning for participating in fight D
NandiniRaizadaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: Gods_child

It was really ridiculous i was like ppl cant demarcate reel and real world and here it seems like sati and parvati were different ..they were'nt..this show is not limited to sati and shiv story its journey of mahadev and his adishakti that wasnt popular in hindi serial...the tittle says devo ke dev mahadev not mohit mouni chemistry.I agree pair created magic..but i am more interested in shiv adishakti rather than actors playing the characters..and definitely its their hardwork that make all mythos lively but that doesnt mean that the central concept can be altered for sake of onscreen chemistery


@god_child i felt the same on reading this rediculous thing.
-Nymphadora- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
i really hope people stop rooting for Mouni as Parvati-and its high time they realize this isnt a run of the mill romance that a Jodi matters over content...its a mythological its GOD you are talking about here...
As per the scriptures Parvati and Sati were alike by soul but different by bodies...yes Parvati and Sati were shown to be played by the same actor in serials like Maa Shakti-but that was to present the fact that they were the same by soul,and as the show was about Devi Shakti hence the face was kept the same...One of the greatest serials ever made on Shiva "Om Namah Shivah" too had different actors for Sati and Parvati!They have to stick to the scriptures regarding the material facts of the show!
People are saying that TRPs will fall,but im sure that people will accept a new Parvati,as long at it is executed properly-DKDM has performed brilliantly only when they showed good content like during the Mahashivratri episode and the Veer Bhadra sequence,and not during fictional romantic sequences!(although i really like them)
DKDM may be a little dramatized,but at the end of the day its a Mythological!-they have to show correct content over everything else-its thier responsibility as the makers of the show-which is exactly what Sohana Sinha had said-they had to get a new Parvati because the story demands it and its mentioned in the scriptures!
Regarding the thing of Mouni being "replaced",Mouni's character of Sati completed its journey,so you cant call it replacement...but when the character stays on but the actor changes like in Ridhima for DMG,Dr Ashutosh for KTLK...THAT is what you call a replacement!

I watch this show for content over everything else-and that is what makes a show like DKDM sell...and as long as the content and story telling is good ill watch the show!
whatthewhat thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago



Fingers crossed we've seen last of the wack-jobs ...I am trying to be patient, but I'll be *this* close to losing it if I see another post about the of "Parvatiness" (😕) or lack thereof of *any* actress... 😆
Edited by narangi_77 - 13 years ago
NandiniRaizadaa thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 13 years ago

I am losing my patience now
617251 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: shruti.nil

i really hope people stop rooting for Mouni as Parvati-and its high time they realize this isnt a run of the mill romance that a Jodi matters over content...its a mythological its GOD you are talking about here...

As per the scriptures Parvati and Sati were alike by soul but different by bodies...yes Parvati and Sati were shown to be played by the same actor in serials like Maa Shakti-but that was to present the fact that they were the same by soul,and as the show was about Devi Shakti hence the face was kept the same...One of the greatest serials ever made on Shiva "Om Namah Shivah" too had different actors for Sati and Parvati!They have to stick to the scriptures regarding the material facts of the show!
People are saying that TRPs will fall,but im sure that people will accept a new Parvati,as long at it is executed properly-DKDM has performed brilliantly only when they showed good content like during the Mahashivratri episode and the Veer Bhadra sequence,and not during fictional romantic sequences!(although i really like them)
DKDM may be a little dramatized,but at the end of the day its a Mythological!-they have to show correct content over everything else-its thier responsibility as the makers of the show-which is exactly what Sohana Sinha had said-they had to get a new Parvati because the story demands it and its mentioned in the scriptures!
Regarding the thing of Mouni being "replaced",Mouni's character of Sati completed its journey,so you cant call it replacement...but when the character stays on but the actor changes like in Ridhima for DMG,Dr Ashutosh for KTLK...THAT is what you call a replacement!

I watch this show for content over everything else-and that is what makes a show like DKDM sell...and as long as the content and story telling is good ill watch the show!


Im sure that everyone understands and agrees with what you are saying. However, I do not think it is wrong for people to want Mouni to be Parvati!

I think that many people, including me, will find the show more enchanting that way! Mouni and Mohit have made this show so divine... and I don't think it is about their "jodi", it is about the way they are able to make the audience fall in love with and respect the relationship of Adishakti and Shiv!

Nothing is impossible for god, and Sati/Parvati were basically the same person! Their soul was the same, so then why does face matter? All that matters is that they are forms of Adishakti who is the other half of Shiv and the mother of this world.

Mouni and Mohit have created the magic in this show... religiously! Mouni has already proved herself, so then why can't she play the role of Parvati?

If Mouni portrays Adishakti, and Adishakti has been given her face, then I don't think it's right to REPLACE Adishakti's character and have some other girl play it!
-Nymphadora- thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 13 years ago
@ tptwi-Mouni was shown as Adi Shakti only as long as Shakti resided in Satis body,once she leaves Satis body Adi Shakti is played by a diffrent woman-and similarly when she is born as Parvati she will look different!Adi Shakti never has a form,to marry Shiva she had to become Human,hence she can look diffrent each time she is born,depending upon who her parents were and what her lineage was!
The beauty of the Mahadev and Adi Shakti story lies in the fact that he loved her Atma and not the way she looked-she gave up her Satis body then how can she look the same?
the Puranas say they looks diffrent so the Cvs should stick to that!...yes they could have taken Mouni as Parvati too thats the other way of seeing it
but the entire objective of taking another face as Parvati is to make a clear distinction between the characters or Parvati and Shakti-who even though were similar by soul were not the same in character, behaviors, personality or upbringing!
Sati gave up her body so how can she be played by the same actor..the whole thing about a rebirth looking exactly like the previous birth thing has been created by Indian Movies and Rebirth as a concept doesn't happen like that..
PS-I didnt mean to say it was wrong to ask for Mouni,at one point of time i wanted that too,but once i understood why the Cvs are doing this i respect thier decision entirely...there is no use even making any request to the Cvs now,Mouni has moved on so have the Cvs and now they are getting a new Parvati!
Gods_child thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: tptwi

Hi!


I just have a few questions that I really would love an answer to 😊



1) Why was mata sati "ayogya" (sorry if I misspelled that) for Shivji?
She was ayoga as she surrounded by ego and wasnt aware of being adishakti..even if she was told by shiv ji the fact yet she never realised herself..
In such situation she was bound to attached to her human characterstics which hinder her role as mother goddess of world...shivji had known this thats why he initially avoided marriage with sati as he didnt wanted to see sati juggling between adishakti and her human form
2) Why did mata sati not remember/know of her being Adi-Shakti, while Parvati maa did? (why was Parvati "yogya" for shivji)
It was lesson from previous life that parvati remember if u go acc to hindu rites then body of sati was converted into shakti peeths no cremation took place niether did any haven...all the rituals of last rites in hinduism hold significance one of them is that soul forgets its previous birth...since no one should have shadows of previous life in new life..

As in sati case adishakti was aware of disasters that took place...she didnt repeat them in her incarnation as parvati
Parvati was soul conscious and sati was more human conscious
3) What was the purpose of Shiv-Sati's marriage/ Sati's birth?
its symbolism ...all the mytho have messages that can be delivered to manking through stories otherwise these messages are too philosphical to be deciphered by commom man

Shiv sati union symbolises union of human with its god..with altering our ego and leaving body consciousness we cant attain highest bliss that is ultimate and is not based on our faculty of sense organs ..its pure soul consciousness...so a failed union and the recarnation of adishakti is lesson to humanity..that one has to undergone self realisation and leave behind traits acquired because of our human incarnation..as like sati all of us are soul that is energy..

In context to story birth of sati and her death ended the pride of daksh thus he blessed with true wisdom..the establishment of shakti peeth saved ppl from asurs...and they seperated temporarily to be united for eternity

4) How could/ did Sati become "yogya" for Shiv?/ How would she realize her powers?
Shivji shed light on route of penance for her milan with her trueself..thats parvati remembering the wisdom that sati recieved from shivji performed penance that sati wasnt able to perform because daksh,s yag..she gave up food as food is requirement if body not soul..so her conscious was very strong..then she gave leaves and survived on water then she was called devi aparna..one who doesnt even consume a leaf...due her great yog she become divine...all this penan e is known as meditation in present times..where we try to decipher our true personanlity and attain absolute truth..
5) Why does Shiv marry Sati even though she is not" yogya?"
Shiv loved sati as they were soulmates..he couldnt let anyone else marry sati as she was adishakti and her tej would have destroyed a common human...so no one except shiv had the strengh let it on soul consciousness or on physical plane to be partner of sati...
He did mention about the ayogata of sati to sati herself but she never took much interest in it...even when after marriage shiv asked her to give an attempt to meditation she was more attracted to havan going At daksh,s place..
All these mistakes were taken as lessons by adishakti and shiv in times of parvati..so shiv didnt accept parvati untill she became yog for shiv through extreme penance and it took quite long for parvati to achieve that..




Thanks in advance!



I hope this will help..😊

Good day

Har har Mahadev
Edited by Gods_child - 13 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".