Are the CV's messing with history??????

What are the Cv's upto? I have truly not heard of any tarkasur during sati's yug wasnt it d story of devi parvati if yes then how can they mix it. I hope d cv's have researched d content well bcoz since d past 40mins surfing thru d internet goin thru d pages of SHIV MAHAPURAN n many sources but could not find any clue to prove dat d precap was true so wats goin on? CAN ANY1 RESOLVE MY PROBLEM OR CONFUSION PLS IF SUM1 HAS ANY IDEA ABOUT WATS GOIN ON DEN PLS GUIDE ME N PLS LET IT B 4M SUM CONFIRMED SOURCE N NOT HEARD TALKS OR PRESUMPTIONS...

i hope not, they are doing a good job so far!

as Total suggest: cool it...

Originally posted by: shali

as Total suggest: cool it...

the cv's might intro the story just to give it an twist...Shiv in action saving Sati...then focus will be back on SS...with Taraksur in ruling and filling his jar with sin's...till Parbati appears..

if they just give an intro to the character,maybe show him getting the vardaan from Shiva etc fine..maybe a Shiva saving Sati scene..cool...as mentioned earlier,a Rakshas could live for a few Yugs...hence it could be possible!

Waiting to see but chill!! I don't think they will make some error in this!!

It's really Confusing...Even if Tarkasur is going to rule, but not for so many years...as per Shiv Puran tarkasur introduction is given only when PArvati is born & when she comes to womanhood Brahma & vishnu pursue Shivji to marry , but he still refuses & then Parvati does Tapasya. There's still long way to go...Let's hope that just to get some TRPS the DKDMD team doesn't bring total twist in the tale & Sati Just doesn't go into Swayambar like that. She too did tapasya & then married Shivji