OSO v Saawariya! - Page 10

Originally posted by: Iron78Iron

😕 so on which one should we waste our time and money.. 😕 😆

OSO - paisa vasool. If you have followed Bollywood over the years, you will love it 😆

Originally posted by: mermaid_QT

I simply loved OSO verrrry much!! will watch again..

You too. So far we have 100% for OSO. How was Deepika? I am asking this because in Bollywood section many of them wrote that since she is stunning she is going to be emotionless and plastic. But there are many who gave positive response to her acting. I find her extremely pretty and very impressed with her politeness and to-the-point interviews.

I am yet to watch both. But definitely OSO is first on my list.

Originally posted by: Maya_M

You too. So far we have 100% for OSO. How was Deepika? I am asking this because in Bollywood section many of them wrote that since she is stunning she is going to be emotionless and plastic. But there are many who gave positive response to her acting. I find her extremely pretty and very impressed with her politeness and to-the-point interviews.

I am yet to watch both. But definitely OSO is first on my list.

Maya, Deepika is really good considering it's her first film and she's had no acting experience. I was comparing her to Ash and even Sush in their first movies respectively, since they were both models too before becoming actors. She's way better than both.

Originally posted by: joie de vivre

Not necessarily...Take Kajol for instance...She is the only contemporary actress who managed NOT to come across as cheesy in aYRF/K Jo film .Kajol didn't have to shed make up to get appreciation,nor did Aishwarya...HDDCS and Devdas are considered to be Ash's best performances,and in the both the films,she was decked in finery,baroque jewellery and make up....Kareena was applauded in Jab We Met,and she didn't go for the non-glam look in the film....Female stars do not necessarily need to eschew make-up and commercial cinema to get critical acclaim....An actress can shine even in a film like Legallyblonde if she can act the part of the valley girl to perfection😃..

But you forgot all those films Kajol did outside YRF. It was YRF which brought her the fame and people started calling her an actor. Dushman was one of the best films she did but people hardly remember that. As for in KKHK and K3G again look at the characters she played. In one film she was this girl whom her best friend ignored to go with the glamourous and beautiful Tina and in another one she is this lower middle classi, loud mouth Chandni Chowk type. So people find her extraordinary in both. But since Rani played the glamourous one, hardly finds mention. Rani was fabulous in KANK too but she was panned because people took the infidelity for real😕. It is news to me that people appreciated Ash' acting in HDDCS. As far as I know people gave entire credit to SLB then for making a non-actor work. Actually it was Provoked when people actually said that Ash was brilliant. Kareena was brilliant in Refugee and we know what kind of role she played. Thereafter people panned her everytime she did a 'Poo' and over-the-top roles till Dev happened.

Obviously the point I am making is people connect with ordinary female actors very easily than the pretty ones like Aishwarya, Kareena and Deepika. When Konkana Sen does a prostitute's role she wins accolades but if Kareena Kapoor plays the same role then you will see mixed response. It is very difficult for people to take pretty ones serious. You think Legallyblonde was a good film of Reese's but she got the similar response as a dumb blond would. Even her then husband Ryan asked her why she does the same kind of dumb films again and again and that he would act with her if she does a serious cinema.

Originally posted by: SholaJoBhadkey

Maya, Deepika is really good considering it's her first film and she's had no acting experience. I was comparing her to Ash and even Sush in their first movies respectively, since they were both models too before becoming actors. She's way better than both.

Is she? That's good. Even before the release of film she was criticized like anything just because she looks stunning and spoke very less. Actually other than the star kids only other female actors we have in the industry are all models like Priyanka, Lara, Bipasha, Vidya.

Originally posted by: Maya_M

Is she? That's good. Even before the release of film she was criticized like anything just because she looks stunning and spoke very less. Actually other than the star kids only other female actors we have in the industry are all models like Priyanka, Lara, Bipasha, Vidya.

She reminded me a lot of Deepa Parab (who plays Sneha in TKTG) 😛

Priyanka was good in her first movie, and so was Lara. Don't remember Bipasha's first one 😳 . Vidya had the added experience of having worked on TV before she did Parineeta, so I would not add her to this list.

And I do agree - you need to look plain to be accepted as an "actress", and if you aren't and decide to deglam, people will question your intentions 😆

Originally posted by: SholaJoBhadkey

She reminded me a lot of Deepa Parab (who plays Sneha in TKTG) 😛

😆😆 QT told me the same some 4 months back.

Originally posted by: sohn

🤣
I really cracked up bigtime reading that Connie! The sets were blue agreed, but not depressing, they were beautiful infact...cummon people 😆 😆

😆😆😆 - baawaria.!!!!.....that was funny....

Originally posted by: joie de vivre

Well mate,for're forgetting Parineeta...I defy anyone to say Vidya wasn't noticable in Parineeta or that she didn't leave an indelible mark..the film was a vanilla remake of a old classic..so neither the movie nor anyone was really noticeable...You cite one scene from Om Shanti Om...I can cite numerous scenes from Parineeta where Vidya showcased a wide spectrum of emotions,and emoted so bloody well with her eyes alone like? I just happen to read about her and she has no expressive face at all.. is mbbs she was hardly noticed... in a role which kulraj became so famous in Kareena kareena...she could get anything out of it...,every single frame of Parineeta packed a punch..yes it was a knockout punch the viewer must have give himself for wasting money on that movie...😆..I agree Deepika was alright as Shantipriya,nothing extraordinary,but admittedly not terrible..But Deepika was pretty ho-hum as Sandy,whilst Parineeta was almost entirely Vidya's show,with Saif and Sanjay pitching in with wonderful performances too....Bhool Bhulaiyaa was a rubbish film which was almost unanimously panned by critics,yet Vidya managed to emerge unscathed(well,almost).i know only akshay never thought vidya was there .. who is the heroine then?..Ditto with Salaam-E-Ishq where everyone barring Vidya and Govinda hammed like there's no tomorrow🤢..

That Deepika is more emotive than Vidya is totally ridiculous,maybe you personally aren't very much impressed with Vidya there are people much much better than viday like Revathi, madhu.. who couldnt make a mark...,but I'll say this much for her....I yet have to watch her act embarrasingly badly.i have to watch her act enough to be noticed.....I've watched some of the so-called bigger and more talented stars like Ash, Kareena,Urmila, Rani,Preity etc ham/act wooden like nobody's business,whereas I'm yet to watch a cringeworthy performance of Vidya...

1. If we're considering the "acting prowess",then Vidya has more than proved her talent repeatedly.where and when.. except parnita which is not really big...she is not noticed anywhere...If we're talking about star-power,then I must say NONE of the contemporary leading ladies have had huge blockbuster movies which they carried solely on their shoulders....The hits of Ash,Rani,Preity etc has been with stars like SRK ,Salman,Hrithik etc.....Only MAdhuri and Sridevi delivered solo-hits,but they are legends sreedevi was successful for the same reasons as srk.. she couldnt really act... ya. just about so so...,aren't they??...And I for one never said Vidya is a legend!!but you said she is a good actress... she has yet to prove herself with some good role... besides paranita... sorry i dont know what was that movie about...

Deepika on the other hand made a mark without me even knowing about her abilities... i didnt go to the movie for her.. i didnt even know much other than that she is prakash padukone's daughter..but the way she acted was terrific.. for a newcomer... she is raw.. with few years more she would really be amongst the toppers.. wait and watch.. as for your vidya.. she is a passing actress - like some of the other actresses i mentioned above she will make a passing impression thats about it.. you cant help it.. she must be related to some filmi guys or show-biz which is why she is even in the film industry...lucky to be there...even if she can act well sometimes..she lacks the x-factor.😊. But for your sake I wish her all the best... since you seem to be swooned by her ordinary acting abilities...😊 she should change her name to Vidya Banal....so that people dont get wrong impressions...😆

Originally posted by: Maya_M

Is she? That's good. Even before the release of film she was criticized like anything just because she looks stunning and spoke very less. Actually other than the star kids only other female actors we have in the industry are all models like Priyanka, Lara, Bipasha, Vidya.

what was she modelling for...Glycodin, xandu balm, pudin hara or sapat lotion...?😆😆😆