Originally posted by: charminggenie
@Birdie- Like your optimism, do let me know when Govt. screw people with black money with data and all that jazz that this failed policy which has reduced our GDP by 2% . Killed about 100 people. Fractured the banking system win .
16,000 Core retrieved while 21,000 were lost.I don't even need to analyze, hyperbole here, go through statements of FM/PM then and to now. You will know what policy failure looks like,The RBI has now finally released data to show that 99% of the notes that were demonetised last November are back with banks. This means that whoever had black money has successfully pushed their money back in the system. This is clearly a colossal failure of the policy.Jaitley in Nov,2016 mentioned that about 15-20% of the demonetised currency, roughly Rs 3 lakh crore, was likely to get extinguished and would not return to the system. Thus it would be confiscated and become RBI property, to be eventually handed over to government for the welfare of the poor. The then attorney general Mukul Rohatgi stated this before the Supreme Court. So how can Jaitley now say the confiscation of black money was never the objective? The cash that does not return to the system stands automatically confiscated. It is like money taxed at 100%.Also, RBI data shows that digital transactions fell 27% in April this year compared to the previous month. Major online retailers like Flipkart and others are experiencing cash transactions similar to pre-demonetisation levels when 60% of all buying was cash based.Your point about Govt. going after the big Corporates who have put the money back in the system. Hmm, how will they do so when according to Democratic Reforms shows how 80% of all corporate money has gone to BJP in recent years. Corporates who have successfully pushed their black money into the system will now contribute 80% of it to the BJP. And as per the new law brought by the government, this need not even be made public.To think with this fractured and reeling economy we wanted conflicts with Pak, China. Might do with some rationalism.