Have a break, have a Chit Chat - Page 29

These ' investors' want Indian ipr laws based on principles of West & not wto which Indian pharma complies..I haven't seen any Auto ( 5th largest exporter of Auto ),tech or global bankers crib about india's infra...this global pharma lobbies are actually not beneficial to any nation

Originally posted by: jadugar

These ' investors' want Indian ipr laws based on principles of West & not wto which Indian pharma complies..I haven't seen any Auto ( 5th largest exporter of Auto ),tech or global bankers crib about india's infra...this global pharma lobbies are actually not beneficial to any nation

and Jeff bezos may be the best businessman of our generation believes in India story so I have no reasons not to..

@Scorp- free mein suggestion main bhi deti hu. Blind faith on 1 leader never works. India has spend years doing that on a single party and see how that did it for us. My job covers India as a region in terms of economics, growth etc etc..online blogs and whatsapp messages are petty PR work. Sometimes it's useful to read Govt's own data or companies's annual reports to know about the major lay-offs.

I can't give out my identity but you can read this https://www.google.co.in/amp/www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets-business/big-bet-on-india-morgan-stanley-sees-nifty-hitting-mount-30000-in-next-5-years-2297739.html/amp..

Originally posted by: jadugar

I can't give out my identity but you can read this https://www.google.co.in/amp/www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/markets-business/big-bet-on-india-morgan-stanley-sees-nifty-hitting-mount-30000-in-next-5-years-2297739.html/amp..

The only pessimistic ambit capital had to give a written apology to it's clients http://m.economictimes.com/markets/stocks/news/demonetisation-impact-overestimated-ambit/articleshow/59555070.cms

Achha have I told here that I work in one of those big bad banks

Random thoughts on being politically correct. Was at a conference where the detective in charge of the Rotherham abuse case was giving a talk. She quit her job over the lack of action taken to bring the perpetrators to justice. She struggled to outright say this, but she was suggesting that the reason so little was done, that despite the officers knowing very well who was responsible for the abuse, they hesitated on taking the case any further due to the nationality of these men, all being predominantly Pakistani men. Probably worried about maintaining the 'peace' in a multi-cultural society, where there are probably existing problems/tensions. I think what hurt for me to hear is that one of those girls contacted her recently asking for advice as someone had leaked her address and contact details online. When the ex-detective informed the police, they still seemed just as hesitant to do anything about it.

Post Rotheram, there's a new case of 18 men convicted in Newcastle, again predominantly Pakistani men involved in the abuse of young white girls. So it makes me wonder the price Britain continue to pay under the pretext being politically correct and protecting its image of not being 'racist'. Le sigh..

I will never understand such PC behaviour...it breeds more contempt and anger.

What a week for SC. Good judgement on instant triple talaq but landmark moment with their judgement on Right to privacy . Tight slap on the GOI who argued that citizens don't have a right on their body.Nice.

Now that the Doklam issue is over, what's your take CG? Who won and who lost? Or is it a draw?