The parents are the ones who did it, the servants could not have carried such a perfect murder that too when drunk.
Also if they were guilty, they would have fled or confessed which they didn't , narco tests were inconclusive, also aarushis body was covered up and crime scene altered , the book she was reading didn't have any blood spatters , her things were kept there later on
@bold- why this benefit of doubt only for servants? Why not for parents? Servents, who had no relation with girl would have confessed if they were guilty, but parents wouldn't confess after killing their own blood and flesh? Why?
How nacro test results were inconclusive? Parents didnt show any involvement in murders and servants described the entire process. Nacro tests are not conducted to reach on any conclusion, nacro tests are just for direction of investigation.
Even if crime scene was altered then who said that only parents can alter? Things were kept there later, they were not kept on proper place. Anyone could do that. Keeping things is just 5 mins job, not 5 hours. Why would parents put blanket on girl after killing if they wanted to prove that an outsider killed their daughter?
If book had no blood mark then there was no blood mark on cloths of parents too. It was confirmed by photos clicked by Aarushi before going to bed, parents were in same cloths in photos, even driver confirmed that he last saw them in same cloth in which they were found in morning. Big question is not how did they save the book from blood? Big question is they killed 2 people and not even single drop of blood was not there on clothes. How?All of the servants had alibis,
And, who decided that their alibis were right? Do you expect them to say yes, we killed them, please hang us? And, what about khukri and pillow cover with blood mark found in room of servent? From where did it come?
Don't go by the movie, it's fiction, read the full report and the evidence presented, it clearly points to the parents, it's impossible for them to not wake up when 2 people are murdered in ur house, one just a few feet away and one dragged upstairs.
If they had dared to make fictional movie in the name of real event, indian judicial system would have filled many cases on producer and director for presenting entire judicial system in bad light. Its not cake walk to make a fiction movie calling it a movie based on real incident. Its confirmed by First CBI office Arun kumar that movie was very much based on fact. Sound tests was conducted by them and he saif that when he cannot hear anything when he was awake, it is very much possible that paarents didnt hear coz they were sleeping.
Which evidence? Didnt they file closer report just becoz there was no evidence? If they had evidence, they would hanged both people. There is no evidence. Yes, there are evidence with CBI like bottles, glasses, part of palm print they found on terrace but they refusing to do any kind of finger print test or send them to some lab for further investigation.
There are 2 different reports. One made by first CBI team and another made by second CBI team. According to first CBI team servants are murderer and according to second CBI team Parents are murderers. I would go with first team, they started investigation when case was fresh and secon team joined when nothing was left.
And, how could anyone drag a dead body on terrace without leaving any blood mark or DNA? He was killed on terrace.
Think about it
What to think? According to report of CBI, father killed them, and mother helped her husband. If this was the case then why would Rajesh Talwar spare his wife who was an eye witness? There was no guarantee that Nupur Talwar would keep quiet at morning? If he can kill 2 people then why not third one?
eDIT- Author Avirook sen has attained all trial and he has said that trials were not fair. Or even his book was based on fiction?
Arjun
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Current Affairs
