If GOD exists then... - Page 38

Created

Last reply

Replies

390

Views

20.3k

Users

29

Likes

75

Frequent Posters

karandel_2008 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
@Mass: Is it just "once" that all the energy got converted to mass? Or are there some instances in the universe where some energy still gets transformed into mass regularly?

If not then it appears that the big process of mass creation happened only once at the start.

@Something timeless: If something timeless created the universe then is it still among us or it just disintegrated into space, time, mass and energy and is no longer there?

Edited by karandel_2008 - 15 years ago
karandel_2008 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
"Those whom the gods love grow young." Oscar Wilde
:P
Edited by karandel_2008 - 15 years ago
413342 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

It is nothing new, but I was just trying to look at cause and effect using different words. Moreover, I was thinking that at fundamental level an electron can be very much analogous to a human body. Its just that human body is more complex, but some fundamental things should remain same. For example, if concepts like energy, input/senses, output/action, free will/randomness or quality can be applied to human body then they should as well be applicable to any particle like an electron and vice versa. Thus, if free will exists for humans then it should exist for an electron as well. However, free will itself may or may not exist.



Agree that at the fundamental level, things would have to remain the same; and most concepts such as energy transformations, communication between the fundamental particles, randomness etc. do apply even at the particle level.. After all, nature does seem to seamlessly collapse the quantum wave into the classical bodies without any visible transformations happening right in front of our naked eyes (at least faster than what our neurons could communicate).

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

On cause and effect, my point was that the cycle appears to be as follows: a signal or energy comes as input, a choice is made involving quality and then an action is done that releases energy to outside. Thus, it appears to me that energy comes in, some choices are made based on the current state and energy is re-cycled back to outside in another form. The current state of the "recycling machine" is also changed in the process.

From an electron's point of view: a photon is received, choice is made to absorb it or let it go. The quality factor , that leads to the decision, here could be whether the incoming photon was in harmony with the current state of the electron. From this harmony and quality sound analogous to me. Later, another photon with different form is released from the electron and the current state of electron may be altered.

If we talk about human body: We receive signals from outside. The choices are made based on something. That something is our current state, our memories, our DNA and our stored experiences. Again the quality factor could be the harmony with the current state of these things. After that it results into some action and energy is released into the environment. Moreover, again the current state of the body in forms of memories is altered in the process.



Makes a lot of sense. While the choices are not too obvious at the particle level, at the classical level, they become much more apparent.

Originally posted by: karandel_2008


What could be the motive behind all this endless recycling of energy? Some possible motives could be survival - if electron doesn't absorb a photon, it may crash into the nucleus or harmony - electron finds some actions that are a true match to its nature.

However, there should be some more grand motive that keeps things turning around. Some motive that has a direction, some motive that is timeless and, thus, has remained unchanged since this universe was born.



Motive as in purpose right? That's the elusive part of this whole puzzle. That's what we are all after. Question is how do we try to understand it at the a) particle level b) universal level, while being stuck at the classical level?

200467 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
Lagta hai kisi ko Oscar Wilde ka bukhaar chadha hua hai aaj kal 😛
karandel_2008 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

Lagta hai kisi ko Oscar Wilde ka bukhaar chadha hua hai aaj kal 😛



yeah actually I dont know what to do at some of his quotes - laugh, admire or something else. 😆
I decided that they are just to be taken as a piece of art 😛
Edited by karandel_2008 - 15 years ago
karandel_2008 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Mister.K.



Motive as in purpose right? That's the elusive part of this whole puzzle. That's what we are all after. Question is how do we try to understand it at the a) particle level b) universal level, while being stuck at the classical level?



It should be a some kind of pattern that repeats itself multi-million times. At classical level we see a very big picture that results from fundamental patterns.

Anyway, I hope that some ongoing new experiments from CERN, particle collider, shed some more light into the mystery.
Edited by karandel_2008 - 15 years ago
413342 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: karandel_2008

@Mass: Is it just "once" that all the energy got converted to mass? Or are there some instances in the universe where some energy still gets transformed into mass regularly?

If not then it appears that the big process of mass creation happened only once at the start.



It's a trick question; mass and energy are essentially the same. What we see as bodies are "pockets" of energy.

Originally posted by: karandel_2008


@Something timeless: If something timeless created the universe then is it still among us or it just disintegrated into space, time, mass and energy and is no longer there?



Any answer to that would be pure speculation at this point as it's not easy to define that something, which is presumably outside of time (and space), in terms of stuff that we understand, by being located within space-time.
Forever-KA thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Khatarnak

Na tha kuchh toh khuda tha, kuchh na hota toh khuda hota
duboya mujhko hone ne na hota main toh kya hota

Mirza Ghalib

oh this is simply superb. wonderful sheyr and very much appropriate for this topic.
413342 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: karandel_2008



It should be a some kind of pattern that repeats itself multi-million times. At classical level we see a very big picture that results from fundamental patterns.

Anyway, I hope that some ongoing new experiments from CERN, particle collider, shed some more light into the mystery.



Talking about CERN, this article was posted today: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1977062,00.html

Please do read it.

We talked about the God particle before.The question is how do particles get mass (or how did particles get mass). Hopefully we will find the answer soon.

Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: King-Anu-Lives

oh this is simply superb. wonderful sheyr and very much appropriate for this topic.

Love of God reduces the individual ego and it then sees all as One.
What gave rise to the individual ego? nothing much except a thought or a dream.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".