Why the Difference???? - Page 11

I agree that the extent to which Aditya sir has been neglected from mainstream recognition is overwhelmingly disappointing, seriously. Though his is the worst case, I think there's been a close amount of misrepresentation for Daya sir and Satam sir as well – the "door-slayer" and phaansi dialogue/finger twirling labels are all equally infuriating piles of BS. For reasons best known to them, the execs have never done them justice in that particular way, always branding them with embarrassing stereotypes. Classic attempt to gain "modern" appeal. That's what much of the audience seems to want these days, and that's what they're dishing out. And it doesn't help that the actors never speak out about it. I'm just glad that Daya sir, Satam sir and especially Dinesh sir are getting some sort of recognition at all at the awards – that in and itself is as rare as gold dust these days. We can only raise our voice at every possible opportunity for what it's worth, I think.

Originally posted by: visrom

It really hurts...I must admit...Satam sir, Daya sir and Dinesh sir have been nominated but not Adi sir. It's sooo

Strato as it seems...I can feel the 'left out' feeling...and can imagine Adi sir saying 'theek hai sir...aap log jayiye...main yahin bureau mein rukta hoon'..(AKA 6)..and staying in the Kamadhenu building as Satam sir, Daya sir, Dinesh sir and B P Singh go to the awards ceremony...

Originally posted by: Chiinnu

There is no left out feeling, he is professional, not an upcoming star.

Originally posted by: visrom

He's a professional and that's why we feel he deserves something good. Not sidelined like this...is anyone in Sony even thinking on these terms????