Chandra Nandini 101-105: Dhai rang prem ke - Page 127

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

Prem I am afraid you are apparently arguing at cross purposes which you seem to have developed into an admirable style. Did you even actually read my post? I doubt you did. Let me copy paste a few words again for your benefit. "Unless and until the others icons have done something irredeemable and irreversible, their personal life would and should be of no concern to the general public."

Please note the words in bold. That means corruption, bribery, lies which destroy other's lives (I never really pride myself that I am absolutely truthful or honest. I do lie sometimes but none of my lies ever destroyed anybody or hurt anybody. If they were, and I realized that, I have instantly apologized for them too) are beyond the pale of what I was exempting these other icons from. All I exempted them from was their personal lives. I think we should give them that space.

If they have done something like bribery, corruption, lies which destroy lives as you cited in your arguments, they deserve to be punished by the police and judicial system. But really, you and I are nobody to sit over judgement on them or impeach them. I hope that was precise enough.

Coming next to the other bone of contention, I was speaking about the RT affair with TK news report which was pure gossip as far as I can judge. Why do you think I meant the Hrithik-Kangana affair which was pretty far from both my thoughts and arguments? But here I wasn't even criticizing or supporting her. I just did not mean HER or HIM. I meant RT and RT alone and the news report about his linkup with his co-star which appears only like a rumor, gossip colomn or publicity stunt or gimmick to me.

Just a request, next time please be precise when you cite somebody and do not twist the argument they have given to suit your own arguments.

PS: In English exam question papers in India, we have a section which we call explain with reference to the context. If you ever had such a section in any of the exams you wrote, you ought to thank your stars I wasn't correcting them. You would have scored terribly in that section in such an imaginary scenario.

Originally posted by: myviewprem

That statement was meant for our society in gen not to you, sorry if you felt i meant to you. We have become highly tolerant of things which were not tolerated like say in 1950s. It was meant for world in gen not to you.

Thanks for clarifying.

Aunty, I agree this beard look is making him look tired but I will still say it's the script nd characterization nd maybe the thought process behind showing a life less chandra is putting him down. I agree tht a rival show on sum other channel is definitely better but the script is playing a big part. As I said when we see a great historical character like cgm we don't expect a devdas or petty issues like typical serialish MUs. As far as the dress goes I liked it nd also there were many scenes even after leap where rajat showed wht he is. Yes the characterisation isn't helping him but as it's said form is temporary but class is permanent.

Originally posted by: munni_rajatfan

Aunty, I agree this beard look is making him look tired but I will still say it's the script nd characterization nd maybe the thought process behind showing a life less chandra is putting him down. I agree tht a rival show on sum other channel is definitely better but the script is playing a big part. As I said when we see a great historical character like cgm we don't expect a devdas or petty issues like typical serialish MUs. As far as the dress goes I liked it nd also there were many scenes even after leap where rajat showed wht he is. Yes the characterisation isn't helping him but as it's said form is temporary but class is permanent.

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

Munni though nobody is questioning Rajat's true class or potential in acting, this show and storyline is getting him nowhere. Where does he even get a possibility to excel or shine? I stopped hoping for better things from CN because the CVs have no story left to tell. As far as his look for CGM goes, I loved his earlier look. But this present look is also not very bad either because RT himself is so good looking.

Originally posted by: sashashyam

My dear Munni,

I do not think you need any more guts than you already have to post anything anywhere! 😉

On my threads, you are always welcome, the only rules being no violent language and no name calling, but arguing one's position civilly to try and persuade the other person. I have never seen the need to fight with others to gain one's point. You would surely not need to do that either. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion.

If people start fighting and misbehaving on my threads, I have only one remedy, since it is a free forum subject to the decision of the mods. I quit.

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Helena's coiffure, even without the corkscrew curls, looked way too large for the Mukhya Maharani's mukut, which was perched on top like an undersized small hat.😆Apama continues to look like a badly tied sack of potatoes.

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

because the CVs have no story left to tell.

Aunty you could have said rotten potatoes hobeste I curse my self yesterday for watching pura din bidad gaya

I like the new girl let's see who drink the vish Chandra ya nandani I think hell get kiss of death and that's how apama is going to come out as deshdrohi her kand is going to exposed