Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 2nd September 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 2, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
ABHEERA IN JAIL 2.9
UMAR KHAYID 1.9
What’s the upcoming track??
Bacha chor is such an incompetent lawyer🤦♀️
Mrunal Thakur Called Mean Girl
I wanted Abheera’s fate for Akshara
Janhvi Kapoor In Talks For Chaalbaaz Remake
In this gen Cliff wali legacy maut will not happen
Anupamaa 02 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Real Woman Power Farhana
Finally a beauty queen who is star material!!
Jee Le Zaraa Is Happening
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 03 Sep 2025 EDT
Originally posted by: myviewprem
Does that mean other than big religious leaders (5-10 people) all the remaining can do anything they want any illegal thing,corrupt, cheat, lie, destroy others etc? No wonder its called kalyug😆because we do not demand honesty and a certain standard from othersRegrding Hrithik-Kangana affair its implied, she talked about a silly ex(not Hrithik) and he sent legal notice for apology. Why would he do that if he was not her silly ex i mean Ex? its implied simple.
Originally posted by: munni_rajatfan
Nd u know aunty it's said I don't have guts to post in ur thread or fight the views in this thread but I don't think I really need guts to post in ur thread at least. 😆
Originally posted by: shailusri1983
Prem I am afraid you are apparently arguing at cross purposes which you seem to have developed into an admirable style. Did you even actually read my post? I doubt you did. Let me copy paste a few words again for your benefit. "Unless and until the others icons have done something irredeemable and irreversible, their personal life would and should be of no concern to the general public."
Please note the words in bold. That means corruption, bribery, lies which destroy other's lives (I never really pride myself that I am absolutely truthful or honest. I do lie sometimes but none of my lies ever destroyed anybody or hurt anybody. If they were, and I realized that, I have instantly apologized for them too) are beyond the pale of what I was exempting these other icons from. All I exempted them from was their personal lives. I think we should give them that space.If they have done something like bribery, corruption, lies which destroy lives as you cited in your arguments, they deserve to be punished by the police and judicial system. But really, you and I are nobody to sit over judgement on them or impeach them. I hope that was precise enough.Coming next to the other bone of contention, I was speaking about the RT affair with TK news report which was pure gossip as far as I can judge. Why do you think I meant the Hrithik-Kangana affair which was pretty far from both my thoughts and arguments? But here I wasn't even criticizing or supporting her. I just did not mean HER or HIM. I meant RT and RT alone and the news report about his linkup with his co-star which appears only like a rumor, gossip colomn or publicity stunt or gimmick to me.Just a request, next time please be precise when you cite somebody and do not twist the argument they have given to suit your own arguments.
PS: In English exam question papers in India, we have a section which we call explain with reference to the context. If you ever had such a section in any of the exams you wrote, you ought to thank your stars I wasn't correcting them. You would have scored terribly in that section in such an imaginary scenario.
Originally posted by: myviewprem
Does that mean other than big religious leaders (5-10 people) all the remaining can do anything they want any illegal thing,corrupt, cheat, lie, destroy others etc? No wonder its called kalyug😆because we do not demand honesty and a certain standard from others
Regrding Hrithik-Kangana affair its implied, she talked about a silly ex(not Hrithik) and he sent legal notice for apology. Why would he do that if he was not her silly ex i mean Ex? its implied simple.
Originally posted by: munni_rajatfan
Well aunty I heard few things about myself in this thread. Honestly I don't want to say anything to those people bcoz I know wht I suffered just bcoz I wanted to stick to the rules of AT. Yes it may sound protective but as sumone said AT is a AT nd it should be treated as one. Anyways if my point of views r said to be protectiveness I don't mind. Like I personally don't feel there is anything wrong in rajat's performance it's the character or rather the way the character is perceived right now is making him looked doomed. Yes chandra is looking doomed bcoz right now he is doomed. He is totally unaffected nd disinterested about everything. People may or may not like his portrayal but personally I can say he isn't disinterested. He is just trying to portray a lifeless chandra. About shweta I never said she is a bad actress or she cant be as good as rajat. obviously she is an national award winner she has so much experience nd obviously she is good but right at the same time her character right now is shinning the most. So obviously tht effect will be there. I'm not saying rajat is perfect, he also has his bad days but certainly many a times he has been good despite this dubious characterization. Nd one more thing there is nothing called fan war for me bcoz I know wht rajat is nd he had always proved people wrong nd will prove people wrong in future as well. As per comparisons goes shweta is a national award winner so it was actually expected from day 1 tht she will be good. So there is no comparisons for me. Honestly noone here or anywhere r gods. Yes maybe rajat is going through a bad phase nd certainly a bad characterization but personally he isn't less than anyone. Sumtimes this happens when judgement starts to come on the basis of portrayal or characterization. When we see a historical character like cgm obviously our expectations r different. Nd I will stick to wht I said even though I'm termed protective bcoz I know wht exactly it's happening.
P.S. about mugdha I will say she was completely a new comer tht time compared to other co stars of rajat.