Chandra Nandini 101-105: Dhai rang prem ke

First Previous

Page

132

Next Last

Frequent Posters

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1271

Chetan did a mixture of Malay and adham boy had me laughing so hard can he do anything else besides this comedy

Wish that mughal song was in ja on rajat Akbar

Quote

shreya roy

@munni_rajatfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#1272

Originally posted by: amina1
Aunty you could have said rotten potatoes hobeste I curse my self yesterday for watching pura din bidad gaya
Aunty amen to that hope he gets a better project maybe other pH and not this

Wish that hair style was given when he was in takshila it would look OK but not on a samrat

It's not known exactly which samrat has wht look. Hair isn't the prob. Infact it made him look younger. Only a shave is reqd thts it.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1273

Munni I said if this hair style would suit a shishya and not samrat of course he looks handsome in any style I guess you mid understand what I said

Quote

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#1274

I think the beard suits right now I don't see anything wrong in it

Quote

shreya roy

@munni_rajatfan

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#1275

Originally posted by: amina1
Munni I said if this hair style would suit a shishya and not samrat of course he looks handsome in any style I guess you mid understand what I said

Well thts wht I said. Many samrat had small hairs as well.

Quote

sashashyam

@sashashyam

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#1276

The question is not of which samrat had which kind of hair. In most cases, we have only the coins to go by. In general, maharajas had long hair, as can be seen even from Raja Ravi Varma's 19th century paintings. But that is not the point.

The point, for me at least, is that Rajat had beautiful flowing locks, which made him look exactly llike a Greek statue. They framed his face and made the elegant planes of his facial bones stand out. Now, this looks like a modern haircut,and it has ruined the beauty of his hair, and diminished his overall looks.

If he was not so strikingly handsome per se, he would look ordinary because of this haircut. There was a shot of the old Chandra during the flashback to Durdhara's death scene, and the contrast was stark.

You young people can accept and admire this new thatch if you like. I do NOT like it, nor could I see any reason for it. Do they think the TRPs are gong to shoot up because of this? It only shows that the director had no idea what to do, so they thrashed about and came up with this.

On the other hand, I liked Chandra's new costume, like that of a Roman consul, without that 9 yard bedsheet.😉 If only they could have left the hair intact, it would have looked wonderful.

Anyhow, as I have dropped out of watching the show, it does not matter to me. Let them muddle along any way they like, and push my poor boy into more weird new looks!

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: munni_rajatfan

Well thts wht I said. Many samrat had small hairs as well.

Edited by sashashyam - 8 years ago

Quote

Joyee Banerjee

@Animal.Lover

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#1277

Originally posted by: sashashyam
The question is not of which samrat had which kind of hair. In most cases, we have only the coins to go by. In general, maharajas had long hair, as can be seen even from Raja Ravi Varma's 19th century paintings. But that is not the point.

The point, for me at least, is that Rajat had beautiful flowing locks, which made him look exactly llike a Greek statue. They framed his face and made the elegant planes of his facial bones stand out. Now, this looks like a modern haircut,and it has ruined the beauty of his hair, and diminished his overall looks.

See, you did it again. How do you always manage to put across the exact case, with the most accurate selection of words 👏 The statements in bold flawlessly echo my POV, thrice more fluidly than I ever would have been able to!

And yes:

"There was a shot of the old Chandra during the flashback to Durdhara's death scene, and the contrast was stark."

These:

Vs, these:

The answer is evident. And I think even his mukut has changed, it seems too big for his head! Now since Tokas is an integrally good looking man, the difference is probably a 70-30 instead of a 90-10. However, short hair also looks good on him, only perhaps in a different get up.

One last point, in the initial runs of Jodha Akbar, Rajat still had comparatively shorter hair, much like the Chandra now, but it somehow suited him better then - probably because of the size of the head gear vis-a-vis his hair and face. These things matter a lot in presentation.