Comparing Madhuri to Alia I m LMAO - Page 13

Originally posted by: pathaka

Agreed

In his first 4 year, He had worked with jp dutta after border (biggest hit of that time) Sooraj bharjatiya, dharmesh darshan, yash raj films , ram gopal varma (naach, sarkaar) , mani ratnam who were the biggest names in the early 2000s…
He did a cameo in k3g too 😂

I dont wanna be rude ( I really never cared but I have a kid now ) but I wish people did research before they posted.

A quick internet check will tell you Karan’s company literally only started producing multiple films in same year from 2008 on. Before that he mainly produced one film every few years ( some which he directed and mostly all had Srk in them)

So the question doesn’t arise even that Dharma might hire Abhishek. By all accounts Dharma in 2000 was what one could say is niche studio

But in Abhisheks early years he worked w many big people without a track record probably cause his dad said connections and mostly they all failed. So I have no problem saying he got similar chances to Alia. If Alia goes into year 22 and is still working even w 7 hit movies total I’d say she had a better career than Abhishek 😂

Sorry I am confused at 15 page discussions on this. Alia of course is better actor than Madhuri ever was IMO. So what are we discussing ? 😳

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

I think it’s safer option to sign Alia for big movie than Big B at this point. She’d bring in more box office efficiently

So Brahmastra is a hit? It has both

Ya phir Ranbir hai balance out karne ke liye😆

Originally posted by: Kyahikahoon

So Brahmastra is a hit? It has both

Ya phir Ranbir hai balance out karne ke liye😆

That started filming 2 American presidents ago 🥺🤣

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

That started filming 2 American presidents ago 🥺🤣

Hope it releases before the President changes again

Originally posted by: pathaka

If we talk abt female superstars, sridevi blows madhuri out of the water …in terms of stardom

She’s had more “performances” to her credit , had more range…got paid as much as amitabh at one point during late 80s and early 90s (khuda gawah time) , she was a pan india superstar with notable work in Tamil, Telugu and Hindi…working with top directors and actors in each language …did more “female centric” films …

Madhuris peak was tezaab to dtph…(half a decade)

Sridevis peak was himmatwala to khuda gawah (a whole decade and a bit, not counting that she was a huge star down south from the 70s itself)

If we look for female equivalents of amitabh, it is sridevi not madhuri…

Again diasagree…Madhuri has always been a bigger star than Sridevi… there have been movies made on “Main Madhuri Dixit baba chahti hoon” there are painters painting their entire collection on her… there have been talks on movies which shld have been named after her.. like people called beta shld have been called beti, and raja shld hv been named rani… her biggest hit hum aapke hain kon broke all box office records, so Madhuri is easily the biggest femal superstar of this country… No doubt Sridevi comes second next…

This ....I could easily imagine Tripti Dimri playing Gangubai (maybe even better than Alia). She is a decent actor but def not as good as being hyped up here.

Alia is a better actress than Madhuri... any day...

😆 seems like a frivolous comparison.

Madhuri Dixit is far ahead in terms of acting, dancing, expressions and sex appeal. And she actioned this all on her own and not crafted by some BW Papa.

Alia is good in certain roles which are scripted to suit her acting skills+ personality. Out of her comfort zone she miserably fails to deliver even a decent performance.

Madhuri is one of the most overrated actresses in bollywood. Is Alia better? Probably yes. She is on that track to easily surpass Madhuri based on the sheer versatility of roles she has done and she has more often than not nailed them too