~ Padmavati: what's real and what's not. ~ModNotepg28 - Page 4

Originally posted by: KabhiKabhi

Movies are meant to be from La La Land. They are figment of someone's imagination that translates in the big screen as per the director's vision.

Futile effort dear. One should always know one's audience before trying to impart wisdom 😆 .


@ OT - ⭐️ 👏 This helps a lot specially for those with little knowledge of history like me 😆 Will comment in sometime gotta go right now. 😊

Anyways, to TM what's the proof of the authenticity of your source & can you provide the link of it?

Originally posted by: StinsonIsHere

Trying to knock logic in there? Ain't gonna happen bro 😆
I just saw the poster post in another thread that it's great that Bhansali got slapped. When Violence starts getting appreciated that's when you know logic has already flown out of the window.

Originally posted by: Pehchaan.Kaun

Futile effort dear. One should always know one's audience before trying to impart wisdom 😆 .


@ OT - ⭐️ 👏 This helps a lot specially for those with little knowledge of history like me 😆 Will comment in sometime gotta go right now. 😊

Originally posted by: ---Betty---

I did see a pic online Queen and Khilji sitting closely and looking at each other lovingly

Nevertheless violence was wrong

For the local people she is sacred and as I said in my other post (in another Padmavati related thread) even if she is a fictional character, the practice of Jauhar among Rajput women when attacked by Muslim rulers (including mass suicide in Chittorgarh by Rajput women when attacked bu Khilji army) did happen, there is historical evidence...

So maybe people see her as a symbol of that sacrifice

Also, can you tell the gist of your post? I read one of your colored bold part which says she never existed?

I apologize if I seem to spam this thread.

Originally posted by: ---Betty---

I did see a pic online Queen and Khilji sitting closely and looking at each other lovingly

Nevertheless violence was wrong

For the local people she is sacred and as I said in my other post (in another Padmavati related thread) even if she is a fictional character, the practice of Jauhar among Rajput women when attacked by Muslim rulers (including mass suicide in Chittorgarh by Rajput women when attacked bu Khilji army) did happen, there is historical evidence...

So maybe people see her as a symbol of that sacrifice

Originally posted by: Parvati..

Seriously,she should be honoured by irfan habib himself for her efforts.

He's got a true follower in her.

While at it she shouldn't spare Maharana pratap, shivaji, laxmibai, prithviraj chauhan, ram, Krishna and many others like them ? Declare them as figment of imagination for us as we won't be able to prove on this board that they ever existed,lol

Also, why not just say moguls came here to civilize us and build Taj Mahal (you got proof there to support your argument ...go ahead ..what's stopping you?)😆😆

And that Aurangzeb came to save the planet from overpopulation...he and other Mughals didn't carry out genocide..the Indians themselves volunteered for the good cause😆

These irfan habib followers 😆😆

So you made an account just to single out one member and pick on them for their opinion.
The TM is not forcing her opinion down your throat. Why the f does it bother you so much?
It's pretty evident who's acting "desperate" here.

Bdw your writing style reminds me an awful lot of another pseudo-intellectual member on here who would pick on people to thrust abba dabba jabba facts on them.

Originally posted by: TheLastOutlaw

Anyways, to TM what's the proof of the authenticity of your source & can you provide the link of it?

TM pichle se pichle janam mein Rani Padmavati ki Saheli thi.
Khush? 😆

About your other post:
Ek Galat se Dusra Galat kat jata toh poori duniya na sahi ho jaati. An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind. Violence should always be avoided. No matter who is involved.