Alauddin Khilji is not a villain, he is anti-hero

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Don't worry, be happy.

@Ranbirrocks

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 9 years ago

#111

Kitna bhi history discuss Karo, SLB will show what he wants to shown about Khilji 🤪

Quote

Charaiveti

@Charaiveti

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#112

Originally posted by: yamyam
Ya... Thing is those were different times, different ideologies, different priorities.. It is quite difficult for us to even wrap our head around what went through during the time

I read that when Mughal areas got captured, a daughter was married off to the winner to protect the main queen while the rest of the harem became the harem of the conqueror.. But this I read on the internet so can't say much about the authenticity

the main mughal harem was not threatened I guess Delhi Agra remained theirs only and the power shifted in between family only.in sultani era many families came. But mughals were from one family only all were descendants of babur

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

pallavi25

@pallavi25

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

#113

What nonsense! 😕

Khilji was an absolute villain! He was a tharki of the worst order! Inspite of having a harem full of wives he was always hankering for beautiful wives or daughters of any Rajput kings, he invaded their kingdoms, defeated the kings and enslaved their daughters or wives.

From childhood we have read stories abt his villainy and cruelty. Unless SLB drastically distorts history, this will be Ranveer's first true VILLAIN role.

A few examples of his cruelty and barbarity:

Mongols from central Asia tried to invade Delhi during the reign of Alauddin many times. Some of these Mongol people also settled near Delhi and accepted Islam. They were called "New Muslims". However, their financial condition was not good. Ala ud-din Khilji suspected them of being involved in a conspiracy against him and of being a threat to his power. He ordered to kill them all in a single day. In 1298, between 15,000 and 30,000 people near Delhi, who had recently converted to Islam, were slaughtered in a single day due to fears of an uprising. Their women and children were made slaves.^[20]^[21]

Political and administrative changes

Alauddin Khilji's administrative and political reforms were based on his conception of fear and control as the basis of good government as well as his military ambitions. The bulk of the measures were designed to centralise power in his hands and to support a large military

Edited by pallavi25 - 9 years ago

Quote

Erika

@roni_berna

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 9 years ago

#114

Yeah, we can't really know what were their circumstances but I guess those women had no say while getting married and were just made to follow rules and regulations set for them. I can't even imagine if they had become slaves of the conqueror what must their lives be then.

Quote

zehreeli.kheer

@zehreeli.kheer

Trailblazer

+ 7

Posted: 9 years ago

#115

Originally posted by: roni_berna
Yeah, we can't really know what were their circumstances but I guess those women had no say while getting married and were just made to follow rules and regulations set for them. I can't even imagine if they had become slaves of the conqueror what must their lives be then.

Actually women of those era dreamt about becoming a part of the harem.. For them, this was like an honor or something if the writings are to be believed.. becoming a slave was a different matter though

Quote

Charaiveti

@Charaiveti

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#116

Originally posted by: roni_berna
Yeah, we can't really know what were their circumstances but I guess those women had no say while getting married and were just made to follow rules and regulations set for them. I can't even imagine if they had become slaves of the conqueror what must their lives be then.

life of slave women even men were pathetic but that's common everywhere Greece Rome Egypt hindusthaan slave culture is always inhuman

Quote

440733

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#117

Originally posted by: Noteworthy

Yeah that's what I'm thinking. Without these lists, I feel like if you're walking around with 60 wives, any random female can be like "oh yeah you don't remember me? I'm wife number 36. Let's get going baby" or something like that😆

They would probably go 😆 These kings were such tharkis back then, I doubt they cared who they went along with as long as she/he was pretty.

Quote

440733

Hibernated

Posted: 9 years ago

#118

Originally posted by: Pemberleydreams
yeah how come he did'nt doult sultans were famous womanizers😕arey they kept list so that any raNDOM girl can't demand any share of money property.No anniversey celebrations😆

The only reason I can think is that he didn't want a full out war between their kingdoms.

Okay thats even worse 😆

Quote

zehreeli.kheer

@zehreeli.kheer

Trailblazer

+ 7

Posted: 9 years ago

#119

Ratan Singh was a little naive😆 Always willing to believe in the goodness of others and wanting to avoid wars as much as possible😆

Quote

fariak

@fariak

Inactive

Posted: 9 years ago

#120

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

I'm more interested in Ratan Singh than Khilji now, I want to know what kind of a ruler he was and a husband. I think Padmini was his second wife right?

😆 slb making khichadi again will he show ratan 1st wife lol or will he show romance btw 2or will he show khilji love 😆