Bigg Boss 19-Daily Discussion Thread- 30th September, 2025
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 1st Oct '25
DADI AS BOOTH 1.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 1, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Swara Bhaskar..someone who dared to say it out loud #respect
Budget Single Digit : 7 cameo openings.
True Face of BIAS & NEPOTISM!
My Box Office Prediction for Sunny Ki....jo bhi hai.
HEY JINDAGI 2.10
Which faces u r fed up of watching
👻 The Manuscript Marauders 👻 BookTalk Reading Challenge October 2025
What are the professional achievements of gabhira
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 2, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Gen 5- Major Discussion Thread
Official Teaser - Tere Ishk Mein - Dhanush Kriti Sanon
Sonam Kapoor is in her family way ? (2nd baby)
Mihir extra marital affair
Deepika & Farah Khan; Some Serious Tension !!! 👀
The Wanderer Planet
Himesh - no more breaking news
Originally posted by: Heisenberg1
lol, you need to move on, a whole paragraph dedicated to my one small passing comment, sheesh. 😆
Wow! Manoj Tiwari is a regional star for crying out loud. Shahrukh is a global star. So again you are back to comparing apples and oranges. It's like saying a person who plays Ranji level cricket is as big a star as someone who plays for the national team. A regional star in any country out there would not be as big as someone who is more widely watched.
😆... thanks, you just proved my point. Even though Manoj Tiwari is a Bhojpuri superstar, we can still objectively say that SRK is a bigger star than him under every metric, but according to your logic, we cannot say who is the bigger star because they work in different industries, even though it is plain as obvious to anyone that SRK is objectively the bigger star.
Yes, that's a good analogy you used, it's all relative, Bhojpuri cinema is smaller than Bollywood, and Bollywood is smaller than Hollywood. So in comparison between Hollywood and Bollywood, Bollywood would be Rajni level cricket, whilst Hollywood would be national level, and as you've so succinctly put it below...
A regional star in any country out there would not be as big as someone who is more widely watched.
Exactly, Hollywood movies are more widely watched, Tom Cruise's movies are more widely released than SRK's.
As for India, SRK doesn't even hold the highest grossing film, nor the highest footfalls, so much for the biggest movie star in the world, the guy is struggling at no.3 in his home turf. 😆 As for international fans, most of his fans abroad are people of South Asian descent, yes he has foreign fans as well, but they make up a minority.
Also amusing is the fact that whilst Hollywood is attracting established actors from all over the world, they have never been interested in the "biggest movie star in the world". 😆
My arguments are just as monotonous as the counter arguments in here to begin with :)
Please go back and look who brought up TC here at the first place! A fan of Tom Cruise brought him up. As for which media I follow , I follow the media the same media that still goes crazy over Pitt and Clooney. I follow the same media that has talked about Pitt and Clooney in the same way it has talked about TC!
My opinion is I have no issue with you or anyone dragging TC into it. But to say stardom begins and ends with him is what I find preposterous. As for Pitt and Clooney , they have been brought up to show they bring out the same kind of hysteria that a TC does. Hope my opinion to you is now clear enough :)
I watch cinema coming out of both countries as well. I don't think you have followed my posts at all because if you did ,you would know I have stated numerous times as to how one can't compare bollywood and hollywood in the way it has been compared here. From comparing earnings , to budgets , to BO collection when it's darn clear that in all three Hollywood leads. America is a developed nation , we are still in the process of it so of course that'll reflect in the industry too.
It's not delusional at all considering you talked about hysteria about Hollywood stars and I said the same hysteria surrounds Bollywood stars. Hysteria is the kind of passion with which the fans and the media follows them. And the hysteria for Bollywood stars isn't just restricted to India. The kind of craze you see amongst the overseas fan is just as intense if not more. If a TC or anyone showing up at a premiere in London will have fans lining up for him then so would a Shahrukh.
As for Hollywood having more audience in other countries...duhhh! That's because their movies are released on a wider scale.
This is hilarious on pretty much every level. You are asking me why I'm comparing. Kindly, like I said before , go back and look who started the comparison. You think a TC is bigger in Pakistan than Shahrukh? Oh okay...wow! This notion that because TC is a big star , he'd be bigger in every corner of the world is preposterous. As for Shahrukh's legacy not being better than TC...ha! You are entitled to your opinion on that , I have mine :)
Originally posted by: --SH7_Sunny--
This is no Einstein question who is biggest star in he world its of course Tom Cruise without any doubt. Srk is no where close to it.
Originally posted by: kritz.anYa.vivu
its cool that you are strong at your argument, and it is sad that even after media hyping over Clooney, Pitt and Shah apart from you nobody in this thread thinks that they are as big stars as TC . A TC fan brought him up here, but i read her post, she stated some good and true facts , she did not demean Shah or his stardom in her post, you took her claim into an argument and then the long arguments but good ones .whoever has dragged TC in here has made a mistake because he surely does not need any approval from India forum for what he is , infact its silly to get all defensive but everybody has their personal choice to make right. when TM opened this thread, she did not highlight the main thesis of the article, the emphasis is more over Shah's bank account.see you are still beating around the bushes, i said that hysteria around HW stars is much bigger than hysteria around BW stars and i never said that indian stars enjoy stardom only in india, but to say that an indian star is the biggest celebrated star in every part of the world is so much of a stretch that even if i want to i cannot accept this.So you are arguing over TC vs Shah and all you mention is a country like Pakistan to defend your argument ? I will tell you that take Iceland, Greece, Russia, Japan, China, etc and do you think a Shah is more bigger than TC in these countries where English is not their mother language too whereas in Pakistan they speak urdu, which is 80% as similar as hindi and you make it sound that it is an big achievement to be known in this country 😆
Originally posted by: Heisenberg1
lmao, you make absolute no sense. I understand your dilemma, as a fan, you believe your star is more popular than he actually is, I get it, but one should look at the reality of the matter, instead regurgitating the same flawed reasoning again and again.
Let's put aside fantasy and look at the facts. Bollywood is a smaller industry, Bollywood does not have the same international reach or crossover appeal as Hollywood, simply because Bollywood primarily caters for a South Asian audience. By that admission alone, SRK is a smaller star, his appeal and reach is severely limited, as opposed to a star like Tom Cruise. Just go to any cinema in Europe, China, Japan. America when a major SRK film is released, you'll see an overwhelming audience of brown faces, maybe the token white face or two, now go to China, Japan and India when a major Tom Cruise movie is released, you will not see a white audience there.
That is the difference between a global star and a regional one. My point about international markets, is that it is mainly the South Asian population living in those countries who are watching these movies, not the natives of those lands. So it gives you the false impression that he is true international star, when he's not. Take Tom Cruise's MI5, it made $135million in China alone, and it wasn't because of white Americans. That is the difference. Bollywood films can't even make $135million gross worldwide.
Slumdog Millionaire was a low budget British film, not Hollywood, originally planned for straight to DVD release. 😆
What’s the plot behind all this? These two brothers don’t get along https://www.instagram.com/p/DNaCjQlB_NN/?igsh=MWE1bjNidGhtbm9zYg==
Salman wanted to do the remake of that Italian film on which Sitaare Zameen par had been made, he share this with Aamir. Instead of leaving it...
...
https://www.indiaforums.com/article/arbaaz-khan-and-sshura-khan-expecting-first-child-couples-visit-at-clinic-sparks-rumours_220788
Sajid Khan was engaged to Gauahar Khan https://www.instagram.com/p/Cjz4lchriwT/?igsh=eHg4Mnk0MThrcGdp
30