is Hrithik Roshan aging badly?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

707763

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#41

Hrithik looks 49 when he is only 41. I don't even wanna know how he will look like when he is THE Salman Khan's age.

Salman when he was 40-42

So yeah think twice before comparing SALMAN KHAN to some amateur noob.

Quote

galaxyfan

@galaxyfan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: Deathstroke
Salman when he was 40😆

This is from phir milenge right? Yes he looks really good for 40 here.

That stupid go bale bale song, he was 40 also i think.. He looked really good there.😳 With the black leather jacket.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

apple-core

@apple-core

Inactive

Posted: 10 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: en1gma
Oh god! So they found ONE BAD PIC of hrithik from a 48 hour shoot? Let the haters have fun, it's not very often they find something to celebrate and lol at the person comparing and saying salman is better looking than HR, funniest thing I heard all day! Height, hair, eyelashes, lips, jawline. Even his body His features are better than them all. Also don't forgrt he went throught a complex brain surgery and a divorce just last year. He needs some time to heal. Been working non stop. He looks better than All the khans at 40. Even if u compare him to to people his age gap he's mile ahead. Arjun rampal, abhishek bachan, saif Ali khan, John Abraham, ajay Devgan and many more in their 40s HR is ageing more gracefully, infact looking better.
Seriously, people found one bad pic of him and are having a party over it

Ditto. You read my mind!

Quote

707763

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#44

48 hours shoot or 2 hour shoot, doesn't matter. People can't say Hrithik looks better than Khans when he is 10 years younger than them. He is suppose to look better and if he doesn't then thats an issue.

Mocking Salman's eye bags, bloated look when he is 50-51 just to defend 41 year old Hrithik is stupid. But what can you expect from some members. They can't digest their food without talking about Salman.

Anyways, Salman now, Salman then, looks 10x better. Proof is here.

Quote

galaxyfan

@galaxyfan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#45

On topic..I used to love hrithik around the time he debuted. But yes he looks terrible now.Esp in that song (dil tu hi bataa)..

Yuck... 🤢

Quote

870349

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#46

His hair is too curly . Needs to straighten it

Quote

707763

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: galaxyfan
On topic..I used to love hrithik around the time he debuted. But yes he looks terrible now.Esp in that song (dil tu hi bataa)..
Yuck... 🤢

He should just move to Mars

Quote

galaxyfan

@galaxyfan

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#48

Originally posted by: MrsSalmanKhan

He should just move to Mars

Or wherever Jadoo is from.

And don't come back until you cut and dye your hair back to a normal hair colour.

Quote

707763

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#49

^^ No no ...guys you are misunderstanding, this is not 30 year old Salman.

This is nearly 42 year old Salman Khan during Baabul Music Launch.

hehe, I know , you can't believe your eyes and you don't know how to defend from this point onwards. It's okay.

Case dismissed.

Edited by MrsSalmanKhan - 10 years ago

Quote

IshqBulaava

@IshqBulaava

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

#50

Hrithik looks really bad in that Dheere Dheere video, maybe because he was clean shaved. I prefer stubble look. Nevertheless, he looks really bad now. Hrithik looked the best in KNPH, AMALL, Fiza and Kites.

Edited by IshqBulaava - 10 years ago

Quote

1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10

Hrithik Roshan

Roshan

is Hrithik Roshan aging badly? - Page 5

Related Topics

Explore Topics